tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17315655186562849132024-03-13T20:26:28.269-07:00Carter's Second Term... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.comBlogger201125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-37434642225074971122023-03-16T11:45:00.011-07:002023-03-16T19:48:19.056-07:00Anti-ObamaNation Anthem Drops Hard On War Room: Trump Won & Everyone Knows It <p></p>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: verdana;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9VWIjc7Iihu9MZqfda4QxLO90iu1jhFv8kS9Xc_CfariBAOpIyRbKaVR6k9gG3OoJ_djaOldpxjnCb6j2dE7dk997Uhx_Z6RuObY2a-bpumQ3W-eOYEQApeoFAXv9yDvoGv97u9OJofKYRlro3k0nLouaAQBZZ9pU3cDdPCvUY7vsYcYs8DlbYStN/s864/warroom-battlegroundtumbnail_66fffp.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="864" data-original-width="864" height="514" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9VWIjc7Iihu9MZqfda4QxLO90iu1jhFv8kS9Xc_CfariBAOpIyRbKaVR6k9gG3OoJ_djaOldpxjnCb6j2dE7dk997Uhx_Z6RuObY2a-bpumQ3W-eOYEQApeoFAXv9yDvoGv97u9OJofKYRlro3k0nLouaAQBZZ9pU3cDdPCvUY7vsYcYs8DlbYStN/w514-h514/warroom-battlegroundtumbnail_66fffp.jpg" width="514" /></a>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: verdana;">
L<i><span style="font-size: x-small;">ogo for Stephen K. Bannon's Real America's Voice program WAR
ROOM. Since the beginning of the virus pandemic that started with
a leak of biologically modified "gain-of-function" research virus
from an American tax-money supported lab in Wuhan, China. Today,
March 16th, 2023, Bannon premiered the video "Trump Won"
by Natasha Owens. Image Credit: Real America's Voice
(2022).</span></i>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br /><span><b style="font-family: verdana;">Anti-ObamaNation Anthem Drops Hard On War Room: Trump Won & Everyone Knows It </b><br /><br /><span style="font-family: verdana;"> If one were watching <a href="https://akvavittheatre.org/2023/03/16/number-one-on-itunes-singer-natasha-owens-joins-steve-bannon-to-discuss-her-latest-hit-trump-won-and-you-know-it-video/" target="_blank">Stephen K. Bannon's WAR ROOM on Real America's Voice</a> this morning - 7:00am PT - one was treated to a song put together and sung by noted Christian & Country music singer Natasha Owens titled Trump Won.<br />
</span></span><div>
<span style="font-family: verdana;"><span><br /></span>
</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: verdana;"><span>Before hitting the Bannon broadcast portal, Trump Won, the single has over 1 million views on YouTube ... and it is yet to be labeled with a warning for viewers as of the publication of this blog notice.</span></span></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mkA2_nijiyE" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>
</div>
<br />
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: verdana;">Natasha has won awards in Christian music and has performed with superstars
from Michael W. Smith to Toby Keith. Her latest album is called “American
Patriot,” the first single is “Stand For Life,” and can be found at -
https://natashaowensmusic.com/ </span></div><div><span style="font-family: verdana;">and accessed on music platforms at
- </span></div><div><span style="font-family: verdana;">https://ffm.to/patriot</span>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: verdana;"><div>This excerpted and edited from Gateway Pundit - </div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<i><b>Christian Music Artist Natasha Owens Releases New Single, “Trump
Won” – Already Has Nearly One Million Views on Social Media – FBI
Perplexed On How to Retaliate</b></i>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>By: Jim Hoft - Mar. 15, 2023 4:45pm</i></span>
</div>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<i>Natasha Owens’ latest release highlights the popular belief that the
2020 election was stolen and Joe Biden is an imposter. Natasha
mixed her belief with a catchy tune. You will love it.</i>
</div>
<div>
<i><br /></i>
</div>
<div>
<i>It is not clear yet how the FBI and deep state will react to Natasha’s
forbidden speech. Surely they are holding meetings and paying
social media to clamp down on such heresy.</i>
</div>
<div>
<i><br /></i>
</div>
<div><i>Via Brian Mayes publicist:</i></div>
<div>
<i>Conservative powerhouse Natasha Owens is doubling down with her boldest
political anthem to date, “Trump Won.” Quietly released on Youtube and
Rumble with no announcement or fanfare, the video has received over
950,000 views within the first 2 weeks and continues to grow in view
counts each day.</i>
</div>
<div>
<i><br /></i>
</div>
<div>
<i>“Everyone I know was so excited to have 4 more years of President
Trump’s America First Agenda,” says Owens. “Thousands of people filled
stadiums for President Trump while no one was showing up for the Joe
Biden rallies. We all stayed up watching the election and we were so
hopeful. But we all woke up to unexplainable events that happened
overnight. In the months and years that followed there wasn’t much that
was investigated and wrongs were not righted. Every time the topic came
up people would say, ‘You know Trump won and ‘Everyone knows it’. When
the film <a href="https://carters2ndterm.blogspot.com/2022/05/two-thousand-mules.html" target="_blank"><b>‘2,000 Mules’ </b></a>debuted I went to watch it. There was so much
proof in that 2 hour documentary that Trump won. It just seemed that
people were afraid to say it publicly. So I decided, it’s time for
someone to sing about what is not talked about. Trump Won and You Know
It.”</i>
</div>
<div>
<i><br /></i>
</div>
<div>
<i>“Trump Won” comes on the heels of Owens’ most recent album, American
Patriot — a bold, proud, powerful concept collection that bridges an
unwavering love of country with the themes of faith and family that have
always played a significant part in her artistry. The album includes
notable tracks such as the powerful pro-life single, “Stand for Life,”
as well as “America First,” a subtle tip of the hat to America First
Policy Institute. The album also includes “Freedom Is The Song,” “Prayer
For America,” and the soaring ballad, “Broad Stripes, Bright Stars,” as
well as powerful new renditions of iconic standards: “God Bless
America,” “My Country, ‘Tis Of Thee,” “America The Beautiful,” “The
Star-Spangled Banner” and “God Bless The U.S.A.”</i>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">[<a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/christian-music-artist-natasha-owens-releases-new-single-trump-won-already-has-nearly-one-million-views-on-fbi-perplexed-on-how-to-retaliate-video/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]</span>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
This could become the soundtrack of choice for watching the recently
released revelatory J6 videos that have shattered regime lies about the
Capitol uprising as spotlighted on Tucker Carlson Tonight - their staff is viewing the over 14,000 of publicly owned video previously never released.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
At
<a href="https://carters2ndterm.blogspot.com/2023/03/anti-obamanation-anthem-drops-hard-on.html" target="_blank">Carter's Second Term</a>, we all know that elections have consequences - stolen elections have
catastrophic consequences! Trump won and we know it!
</div>
<div><b>ENDS</b></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b>
<i>Natasha Owens, Trump Won, WAR ROOM, Stephen K. Bannon, Gateway
Pundit, American Patriot, Spotify, Apple Music, iTunes, Carter's
Second Term</i></span>
</div></span>
</div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0Los Angeles, CA, USA34.0522342 -118.24368495.7420003638211554 -153.3999349 62.362468036178846 -83.0874349tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-57060817704172600782022-05-07T20:46:00.006-07:002022-05-10T18:25:25.820-07:00Two-Thousand #MULES<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2o9wTMSkpeOBQozNSon-pR_K1PkIxEcK5Dd78JpnnjLLSqinagdzk_9qz96Jbkc-Sbf1CFXdKgm9ghgvguHHfwfv3q_rOAlOw_gS717d5BSYNq5SRPJQ2j1Qqrl1Ue1sG7NRomM2BZtb78YkZOvjENYUhSvwonxfpEcjyzOqT9NICaa4Otg/s967/Democrat%20Mule.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="967" data-original-width="967" height="556" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2o9wTMSkpeOBQozNSon-pR_K1PkIxEcK5Dd78JpnnjLLSqinagdzk_9qz96Jbkc-Sbf1CFXdKgm9ghgvguHHfwfv3q_rOAlOw_gS717d5BSYNq5SRPJQ2j1Qqrl1Ue1sG7NRomM2BZtb78YkZOvjENYUhSvwonxfpEcjyzOqT9NICaa4Otg/w556-h556/Democrat%20Mule.jpg" width="556" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="font-size: x-small;">What's in a name of a crime that sets it apart from other crimes? How about crimes of Trafficking - what do they mean? Items moved, for and of, power and profit ... money! We have Human Trafficking that is being promoted by the Democrat Political Party in concert with the Mexican Crime Cartels. This same Democrat Political Party committed Ballot Trafficking in order to steal a national level election. Both involve crimes spelled out in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).</span></i>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<br /><b>Two-Thousand #MULES</b>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>
Elections Have Consequences - Stolen Elections Have Catastrophic
Consequences
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
2000 Mules proves that where the use of mail-in ballots and private sector
(not Government sector as required by law) provided drop boxes is a 100%
process for voter fraud.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
The analysis shown in 2000 Mules proves Ballot Trafficking occurred JUCING
the election through a felonious act and each and every ballot stuffed into
a box in this way is as if Lance Armstrong, who won the Tour de France 7
times through DOPING did so illegally - the remedy, Lance was stripped of
all titles.
</div>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">
Ballot Trafficking Mule -
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MULES?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MULES</a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MULES?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MULES</a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MULES?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MULES</a><br /><br />2000 MULES<br />LINK:<a href="https://t.co/J4czuiiZYs">https://t.co/J4czuiiZYs</a>
<a href="https://t.co/ej9Hx57MTx">pic.twitter.com/ej9Hx57MTx</a>
</p>
— GANTRY (@GANTRY68284846)
<a href="https://twitter.com/GANTRY68284846/status/1523115524095315969?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2022</a>
</blockquote>
<script async="" charset="utf-8" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>
</div>
<div><div>The only remedy is to decertify all of the Electoral delegates that were placed there for the Biden/Harris ticket and recertify for Trump/Pence before our country is placed into war with Russia.</div><div><br /></div><div><b>2000 MULES</b></div><div><i>LINK:</i></div><div>https://2000mules.com</div></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-86011635318442044702021-02-25T12:00:00.006-08:002021-02-26T11:02:26.550-08:00"THE MAN SAID SO" Is Democrat Political Party Evolution On Women's Rights Where Women Don't Matter<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj33GXQWwXhxQviS1r-qj-rhzzvGGnfKgrcpXkz3A3fKxOlM22fAGPYI-kcSpAYe649jf7UDiyyK_AuM9m362lAEmg16wXS3ei8M6w3E3Nit-GhKpDMwJoafj9jN9yE8CpJM2qQaCGSl28/s587/Capture+-+THE+MAN+SAID+SO.PNG" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="383" data-original-width="587" height="364" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj33GXQWwXhxQviS1r-qj-rhzzvGGnfKgrcpXkz3A3fKxOlM22fAGPYI-kcSpAYe649jf7UDiyyK_AuM9m362lAEmg16wXS3ei8M6w3E3Nit-GhKpDMwJoafj9jN9yE8CpJM2qQaCGSl28/w558-h364/Capture+-+THE+MAN+SAID+SO.PNG" width="558" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>Facebook Word Plate By Edmund Jenks</i></span>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<p></p>
<b>"THE MAN SAID SO" Is Democrat Political Party Evolution On Women's Rights
Where Women Don't Matter</b>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
This is what all of this Woke-ness amounts to for DNA Females in our Democrat
Political Party run America.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
If a man says he's a woman, you do not matter - your rights to compete on a
level playing field in sports, the workplace given Identity Politics, in being
picked for Federal or State Government Office - you do not matter if the man
says so.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<div>The PUSH For New "Equal Rights" Legislation</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Red Eye Radio - Last night explored this whole issue that has been the
Left-Wing agenda pushed too far so as to eliminate the 100+ years of the
pursuit of Equal Rights for the Gender/Sex that are known as biological
Women.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><b>Red Eye Radio 2/24/21 Part 1 - BEGIN @ 10:00 minutes in:</b><br /></div>
<div>
<iframe frameborder="0" height="180px" src="https://omny.fm/shows/red-eye-radio/red-eye-radio-2-25-21-part-1/embed?t=10m" width="100%"></iframe></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Transcribed With Phone App. (not perfect)</div>
<div>
Look who is marginalized in this whole thing it is Democrats - think about
it that is spoken out against us oh yeah and said we can't allow this to
continue.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
No, stand aside, it's gonna continue and Tiitle 9 is done, that's all.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
If you if you are the parent of a daughter, and your daughter wants to play
sports, your daughter won't have the same opportunity as before.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
I don't know, for the mainstream media probably wouldn't touch it because
they know that basically Americans would sit there and say "this is
absolutely insane" - but this is what Joe Biden believes this is what the
Democrat Leadership ... and remember they did this day one - and notice how
whether it was the incoming education secretary or Merrick Garland - none of
them will address the actual question - they ignore it because they know
they can't win it ... yet they continue to push it.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>They can't tell you the truth about what they're doing now.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
They won't be blunt and say, "No, we believe boys should play girls sports!"
... What will this mean to girls and Title 9 opportunities? ... "We don't
care whether women have opportunities, men believing their women supersedes
anything that a woman wants!"
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Men always lead, men are the ones that dictate to women, what can they do
when men can say we are women and can remove the opportunity for biological
women in sports.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
What a man thinks, matters - what women think doesn't matter and your
daughter just needs to get used to male genitalia! Your daughter needs to
get used to male genitalia! That's not what we are saying, that's the
Charlotte Observer and it's Editorial Board ... that's couple years ago!
[the Charlotte Observer opined] your daughter is a bigot your daughter is
evil for not accepting, and wanting, and embracing male genitalia in the
Locker Room ... she just needs to get used to it man!
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
I love this paper's "the world the Left has built" - don't you picture,
could you imagine, if that was actually our opinions [on Red Eye Radio] and
we promoted it on the show, could you imagine the feedback? Oh my God, if we
said that - just reverse it - we're in a Bizarro World, and you and I are on
the left, and be the Antimatter world - that we're in the Antimatter world.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Can you imagine of Trump said this at the start - if Trump went through 2016
promoting that but saying it exactly how it would play up?
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
I believe that men who say they are women have the right over your daughter
or a place over them on that thing ... because white men said What Men Say
Matters.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Women! When does it matter? ... and your daughters need to get used to male
genitalia.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/18/charlotte-observer-girls-must-try-overcoming-disco/
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>----</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<b>CONTINUES - Red Eye Radio 2/24/21 Part 2 - BEGIN @ 39:20 minutes in:</b><br />
</div>
<div> <iframe src="https://omny.fm/shows/red-eye-radio/red-eye-radio-2-26-21-part-2/embed?t=39m20s" width="100%" height="180px" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Transcribed With Phone App. (not perfect)</div>
<div>
What describes it really - I think really well - is that you must submit if
you're a woman to what the man says ... if the man says "I'm a woman" - you
have to submit and you have to submit your chance and opportunity, your
chance to compete fairly, your feelings don't matter.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
What? You have taken actions that are afforded you under Title 9 - will take
a back seat to the protections that are afforded the man and you can ask
yourself, well ... how did the man get these protections? Because he said
because he said so!
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>So, any answer to "Why is this is going on?"</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Because the man said so - and if you're the woman you must submit to the
will of the man even if the man says I am a woman and, therefore, I just
don't feel like a woman - feeling like a woman makes me a biological woman -
and therefore you must submit to what I believe - and if you don't, you're
the bigot - and if you don't become comfortable with my genitalia, you are
an intolerant, evil bigot!
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
This is the common sense legislation that is coming out from the Biden
Administration - this is what Joe Biden thinks, and if he didn't think it,
it wouldn't be happening.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
This is they call Joe Biden, a moderate Democrat, this is what today's
moderate Democrat believes - if The Man Said So, you, the woman must abide
by what the man says, even if it is not based in any science, or any type of
rational critical thinking.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
If the man says it, you, the woman, must submit your rights - and regardless
of how long the battle to achieve those rights [<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States" target="_blank">over 100 years</a>].
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
To understand ... here the news was celebrated by Connecticut Attorney
General William Tong, listen to what he said where told Associated Press "<b>transgender girls are girls</b>
and every woman and girl deserves protection against discrimination. He
lies, they're not girls ... and it doesn't protect against discrimination -
in fact this absolutely discriminates against women and their life - its
anti-women in it's massage.
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">[<b><i><a href="https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-school-athletics-high-school-sports-lawsuits-william-barr-0d7fa2922b5fa5686a2f5d79ce081481" target="_blank">Reference Here >>></a></i></b>]</span>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Honestly, it's not based in any type of science. It's based on the
philosophy if the what the man says matters what the woman thinks doesn't
matter.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong didn't include the entire sentence
we've been saying, Liberals never finish the sentence - if he had finished
the sentence, it would be it because you're asking "How do you know they're
girls?" ... because <b>The Man Said So</b> - right,<b>
the man gets to dictate the sexuality of a woman!</b>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
Wow! That's women's rights - this is what we talked on how insane they are.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
This is where they wish to go - the insanity continues on this issue to
complete and total insanity - not based in any logic - any type of critical
thinking any science - any time the Democrats [and Establishment
Republicans] tell you that they are the party of science, you can tell them
to go jump into the lake.
</div>
<div><b>ENDS</b></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
And so continues the Bizzaro World saga of the Left-Wing, Democrat,
Establishment Republican, DEEP STATE of our "Bureaucracy For Life" Federal
Governance here during the episode of the 2021
<a href="https://carters2ndterm.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-man-said-so-is-democrat-political.html" target="_blank">Carter's Second Term</a> known as the Joe Biden 46th Presidency.
</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b>
<i>Red Eye Radio, Gary McNamara, Eric Harley, #JRB46, Joe Biden,
Nancy Pelosi, Democrat Political Party, Leadership, Woke, Connecticut
Attorney General, William Tong, Bureaucracy For Life, Carter's Second
Term</i></span>
</div>
<div><br /></div>
</div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-86167269850785214822020-08-21T19:35:00.001-07:002020-08-21T19:37:36.421-07:00Problem-Reaction-Solution: Death Of A Free Society Through Healthcare Part Two<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEwC5P6r0J2J34ruDcIrGyPWV5rDzaWOljPZm7nT6mGnFOuj275P4JwP3CaUEXLEb4N2fllHdBJBbs4Nyor5n97eVCl6gaoLnbn9Nv1DKSDFeTtVwhdG6tDS-gLR24Bdg4O1KtePtD4XQ/s920/Capture+-Tom+Inglesby+-+Plandemic2+Plate.PNG" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="457" data-original-width="920" height="249" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEwC5P6r0J2J34ruDcIrGyPWV5rDzaWOljPZm7nT6mGnFOuj275P4JwP3CaUEXLEb4N2fllHdBJBbs4Nyor5n97eVCl6gaoLnbn9Nv1DKSDFeTtVwhdG6tDS-gLR24Bdg4O1KtePtD4XQ/w500-h249/Capture+-Tom+Inglesby+-+Plandemic2+Plate.PNG" width="500" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i>Major players, including Christopher Elias from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, attend the October 19, 2019 meeting in New York, New York, five months before the world wide pandemic, of "EVENT 201- A Global Pandemic Exercise." Image Credit: Plandemic Series (2020) </i></span><br /></td></tr></tbody></table><p><br />
<b>Problem-Reaction-Solution: Death Of A Free Society Through Healthcare Part Two</b><br />
<br />This process all began after a 3 hour interview with whistleblower & scientist, Judy Mikovits - Plandemic Part 1. Her testimony shines light on the depth of corruption behind key players in our global healthcare system, after this discussion, there was no turning back.<br /><br />Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic 2: INDOCTORNATION, tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic. Plandemic 2 connects the dots between all forms of media, the medical industry, politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts of interests with the decision makers that are currently managing this crisis.<br /><br />
</p><div style="text-align: center;"><iframe frameborder="0" height="326" scrolling="no" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/TiU593C7jwRV/" style="border: none;" width="580"></iframe><br /></div><p>
<br />
To be clear, Plandemic Part 2 INDOCTORNATION documentary style,
feature length presentation explores how Health pathogens (viruses),
Governments, International Health Organizations, Big Pharma &
Investors, and New Media communications portals/tools are being used to
control and make extreme profits from the over seven billion Human
beings living on Earth. Please enjoy and share widely this presentation
with anyone who wishes to maintain control over their own lives in
freedom. Information is power - use this power wisely.</p><p>The
reason for this posting here at Carter's Second Term is to assure that Plandemic 2: INDOCTORNATION movie gets published broadly on our interwebs. The original
YouTube posting of this video was taken down by YouTube for reasons
that will make themselves very clear once one has viewed this video
posting.<br /> </p><p style="text-align: left;"> <br />
<br /><span style="font-size: small;">
</span></p><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>TAGS:</b><span> </span><i>#plandemic, #covid19, #coronavirus, #indoctornation, #pandemic, #conspiracy, Mikki Willis, Dr. David E. Martin, Dr. Mikovits PhD, Vaccine, COVID-19, Human activity, mass control, extreme profit, Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO, CDC, Bill Gates, UN, Carter's Second Term, Plandemic, Summer 2020</i></span></div>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-78549049369414285932020-07-31T08:41:00.002-07:002020-07-31T10:45:40.460-07:00Barack H. Obama - The Perpetual Carter's Second Term - Politicizes Funeral <table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKah3FYRLxROtDRvlYB5O55zXGa4wus3HHd6qLk6G8kg3DvTS0GZpkbcFL5azQ0OYn7wzbJZ0LUXHL_Fn8I6fAYB1RBjqy6Uzs9kd7BGalkNyyQR-7YgD6Ji_fFVB_XTqsrb27N3n4agA/s1600/Obama+Logo+With+Eye+safe_image.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="248" data-original-width="476" height="207" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKah3FYRLxROtDRvlYB5O55zXGa4wus3HHd6qLk6G8kg3DvTS0GZpkbcFL5azQ0OYn7wzbJZ0LUXHL_Fn8I6fAYB1RBjqy6Uzs9kd7BGalkNyyQR-7YgD6Ji_fFVB_XTqsrb27N3n4agA/s400/Obama+Logo+With+Eye+safe_image.png" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">On July 30, 2020 in the run-up to the November 3rd, 2020 election for POTUS, former President Barack H. Obama delivers </span></i><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>eulogy </i></span><i style="font-size: 12.8px;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">remarks that paid tribute to Representative John Lewis at his funeral, and called on lawmakers to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via Screengrab (2020)</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b><br /></b>
<b>Barack H. Obama - The Perpetual Carter's Second Term - Politicizes Funeral </b><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allow="encrypted-media" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="725" scrolling="no" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FThe.EDJE%2Fposts%2F10157434014632897&width=500" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" width="500"></iframe></div>
<br />
This excerpted and edited from The New York Times -<br />
<br />
<i><b>Read the Full Transcript of Obama’s Eulogy for John Lewis</b></i><br />
<i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Mr. Obama praised Mr. Lewis, saying “he as much as anyone in our history brought this country a little bit closer to our highest ideals.”</span></i><br />
<i><span style="font-size: x-small;">By The New York Times - July 30, 2020</span></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Former President Barack Obama delivered the eulogy at John Lewis’s funeral in Atlanta on Thursday, calling Mr. Lewis an “American whose faith was tested again and again to produce a man of pure joy and unbreakable perseverance.”</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i><b>Here are Mr. Obama’s remarks in full:</b></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>James wrote to the believers, “Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance. Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, lacking nothing.”</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>It is a great honor to be back in Ebenezer Baptist Church, in the pulpit of its greatest pastor, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., to pay my respects to perhaps his finest disciple — an American whose faith was tested again and again to produce a man of pure joy and unbreakable perseverance — John Robert Lewis.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>To those who have spoken to Presidents Bush and Clinton, Madam Speaker, Reverend Warnock, Reverend King, John’s family, friends, his beloved staff, Mayor Bottoms — I’ve come here today because I, like so many Americans, owe a great debt to John Lewis and his forceful vision of freedom.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Now, this country is a constant work in progress. We were born with instructions: to form a more perfect union. Explicit in those words is the idea that we are imperfect; that what gives each new generation purpose is to take up the unfinished work of the last and carry it further than anyone might have thought possible.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<b>Eulogy Begins In Earnest</b><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>John Lewis — the first of the Freedom Riders, head of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, youngest speaker at the March on Washington, leader of the march from Selma to Montgomery, Member of Congress representing the people of this state and this district for 33 years, mentor to young people, including me at the time, until his final day on this Earth — he not only embraced that responsibility, but he made it his life’s work.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Which isn’t bad for a boy from Troy. John was born into modest means — that means he was poor — in the heart of the Jim Crow South to parents who picked somebody else’s cotton. Apparently, he didn’t take to farm work — on days when he was supposed to help his brothers and sisters with their labor, he’d hide under the porch and make a break for the school bus when it showed up. His mother, Willie Mae Lewis, nurtured that curiosity in this shy, serious child. “Once you learn something,” she told her son, “once you get something inside your head, no one can take it away from you.”</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>As a boy, John listened through the door after bedtime as his father’s friends complained about the Klan. One Sunday as a teenager, he heard Dr. King preach on the radio. As a college student in Tennessee, he signed up for Jim Lawson’s workshops on the tactic of nonviolent civil disobedience. John Lewis was getting something inside his head, an idea he couldn’t shake that took hold of him — that nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience were the means to change laws, but also change hearts, and change minds, and change nations, and change the world.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>So he helped organize the Nashville campaign in 1960. He and other young men and women sat at a segregated lunch counter, well-dressed, straight-backed, refusing to let a milkshake poured on their heads, or a cigarette extinguished on their backs, or a foot aimed at their ribs, refused to let that dent their dignity and their sense of purpose. And after a few months, the Nashville campaign achieved the first successful desegregation of public facilities in any major city in the South.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>John got a taste of jail for the first, second, third … well, several times. But he also got a taste of victory. And it consumed him with righteous purpose. And he took the battle deeper into the South.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>That same year, just weeks after the Supreme Court ruled that segregation of interstate bus facilities was unconstitutional, John and Bernard Lafayette bought two tickets, climbed aboard a Greyhound, sat up front, and refused to move. This was months before the first official Freedom Rides. He was doing a test. The trip was unsanctioned. Few knew what they were up to. And at every stop, through the night, apparently the angry driver stormed out of the bus and into the bus station. And John and Bernard had no idea what he might come back with or who he might come back with. Nobody was there to protect them. There were no camera crews to record events. You know, sometimes, we read about this and kind of take it for granted. Or at least we act as if it was inevitable. Imagine the courage of two people Malia’s age, younger than my oldest daughter, on their own, to challenge an entire infrastructure of oppression.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>John was only twenty years old. But he pushed all twenty of those years to the center of the table, betting everything, all of it, that his example could challenge centuries of convention, and generations of brutal violence, and countless daily indignities suffered by African Americans.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Like John the Baptist preparing the way, like those Old Testament prophets speaking truth to kings, John Lewis did not hesitate — he kept on getting on board buses and sitting at lunch counters, got his mug shot taken again and again, marched again and again on a mission to change America.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Spoke to a quarter million people at the March on Washington when he was just 23.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Helped organize the Freedom Summer in Mississippi when he was just 24.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>At the ripe old age of 25, John was asked to lead the march from Selma to Montgomery. He was warned that Governor Wallace had ordered troopers to use violence. But he and Hosea Williams and others led them across that bridge anyway. And we’ve all seen the film and the footage and the photographs, and President Clinton mentioned the trench coat, the knapsack, the book to read, the apple to eat, the toothbrush — apparently jails weren’t big on such creature comforts. And you look at those pictures and John looks so young and he’s small in stature. Looking every bit that shy, serious child that his mother had raised and yet, he is full of purpose. God’s put perseverance in him.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>And we know what happened to the marchers that day. Their bones were cracked by billy clubs, their eyes and lungs choked with tear gas. As they knelt to pray, which made their heads even easier targets, and John was struck in the skull. And he thought he was going to die, surrounded by the sight of young Americans gagging, and bleeding, and trampled, victims in their own country of state-sponsored violence.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>And the thing is, I imagine initially that day, the troopers thought that they had won the battle. You can imagine the conversations they had afterwards. You can imagine them saying, “Yeah, we showed them.” They figured they’d turned the protesters back over the bridge; that they’d kept, that they’d preserved a system that denied the basic humanity of their fellow citizens. Except this time, there were some cameras there. This time, the world saw what happened, bore witness to Black Americans who were asking for nothing more than to be treated like other Americans. Who were not asking for special treatment, just the equal treatment promised to them a century before, and almost another century before that.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>When John woke up, and checked himself out of the hospital, he would make sure the world saw a movement that was, in the words of Scripture, “hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed.” They returned to Brown Chapel, a battered prophet, bandages around his head, and he said more marchers will come now. And the people came. And the troopers parted. And the marchers reached Montgomery. And their words reached the White House — and Lyndon Johnson, son of the South, said “We shall overcome,” and the Voting Rights Act was signed into law.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The life of John Lewis was, in so many ways, exceptional. It vindicated the faith in our founding, redeemed that faith; that most American of ideas; that idea that any of us ordinary people without rank or wealth or title or fame can somehow point out the imperfections of this nation, and come together, and challenge the status quo, and decide that it is in our power to remake this country that we love until it more closely aligns with our highest ideals. What a radical ideal. What a revolutionary notion. This idea that any of us, ordinary people, a young kid from Troy can stand up to the powers and principalities and say no this isn’t right, this isn’t true, this isn’t just. We can do better. On the battlefield of justice, Americans like John, Americans like the Reverends Lowery and C.T. Vivian, two other patriots that we lost this year, liberated all of us that many Americans came to take for granted.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>America was built by people like them. America was built by John Lewises. He as much as anyone in our history brought this country a little bit closer to our highest ideals. And someday, when we do finish that long journey toward freedom; when we do form a more perfect union — whether it’s years from now, or decades, or even if it takes another two centuries — John Lewis will be a founding father of that fuller, fairer, better America.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>And yet, as exceptional as John was, here’s the thing: John never believed that what he did was more than any citizen of this country can do. I mentioned in the statement the day John passed, the thing about John was just how gentle and humble he was. And despite this storied, remarkable career, he treated everyone with kindness and respect because it was innate to him — this idea that any of us can do what he did if we are willing to persevere.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He believed that in all of us, there exists the capacity for great courage, that in all of us there is a longing to do what’s right, that in all of us there is a willingness to love all people, and to extend to them their God-given rights to dignity and respect. So many of us lose that sense. It’s taught out of us. We start feeling as if, in fact, that we can’t afford to extend kindness or decency to other people. That we’re better off if we are above other people and looking down on them, and so often that’s encouraged in our culture. But John always saw the best in us. And he never gave up, and never stopped speaking out because he saw the best in us. He believed in us even when we didn’t believe in ourselves. As a Congressman, he didn’t rest; he kept getting himself arrested. As an old man, he didn’t sit out any fight; he sat in, all night long, on the floor of the United States Capitol. I know his staff was stressed.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<b>Eulogy Ends - Political Campaigning Begins</b><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>But the testing of his faith produced perseverance. He knew that the march is not yet over, that the race is not yet won, that we have not yet reached that blessed destination where we are judged by the content of our character. He knew from his own life that progress is fragile; that we have to be vigilant against the darker currents of this country’s history, of our own history, with their whirlpools of violence and hatred and despair that can always rise again.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
[Democrat]<i> Bull Connor may be gone. But today we witness with our own eyes police officers kneeling on the necks of Black Americans </i>[in decades controlled Democrat Political Party cities]<i>. George Wallace may be gone. But we can witness our federal government sending agents to use tear gas and batons against </i>[riot fomenting]<i> peaceful demonstrators. We may no longer have to guess the number of jelly beans in a jar in order to cast a ballot </i>[in Democrat Political Party cities]<i>. But even as we sit here, there are those in power are doing their darnedest to discourage people from voting — by closing polling locations, and targeting minorities and students with restrictive ID laws, and attacking our voting rights with surgical precision, even undermining the Postal Service in the run-up to an election that is going to be dependent on mailed-in ballots so people don’t get sick.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Now, I know this is a celebration of John’s life. There are some who might say we shouldn’t dwell on such things. But that’s why I’m talking about it. John Lewis devoted his time on this Earth fighting the very attacks on democracy and what’s best in America that we are seeing circulate right now.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He knew that every single one of us has a God-given power. And that the fate of this democracy depends on how we use it; that democracy isn’t automatic, it has to be nurtured, it has to be tended to, we have to work at it, it’s hard. And so he knew it depends on whether we summon a measure, just a measure, of John’s moral courage to question what’s right and what’s wrong and call things as they are. He said that as long as he had breath in his body, he would do everything he could to preserve this democracy. That as long as we have breath in our bodies, we have to continue his cause. If we want our children to grow up in a democracy — not just with elections, but a true democracy, a representative democracy, a big-hearted, tolerant, vibrant, inclusive</i> [without any push-back from Constitutional Conservatives in the Republican Political Party]<i> America of perpetual self-creation — then we are going to have to be more like John. We don’t have to do all the things he had to do because he did them for us. But we have got to do something. As the Lord instructed Paul, “Do not be afraid, go on speaking; do not be silent, for I am with you, and no one will attack you to harm you, for I have many in this city who are my people.” Just everybody’s just got to come out and vote. We’ve got all those people in the city but we can’t do nothing.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Like John, we have got to keep getting into that good trouble. He knew that nonviolent protest is patriotic; a way to raise public awareness, put a spotlight on injustice, and make the powers that be uncomfortable.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Like John, we don’t have to choose between protest and politics, it is not an either-or situation, it is a both-and situation. We have to engage in </i>[peacefully, without riotous antics, as mentioned in the Constitution of the United States]<i> protests where that is effective but we also have to translate our passion and our causes into laws and institutional practices. That’s why John ran for Congress thirty-four years ago.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Like John, we have got to fight even harder for the most powerful tool we have, which is the right to vote. The Voting Rights Act is one of the crowning achievements of our democracy. It’s why John crossed that bridge. It’s why he spilled his blood. And by the way, it was the result of Democratic and Republican efforts. President Bush, who spoke here earlier, and his father, both signed its renewal when they were in office. President Clinton didn’t have to because it was the law when he arrived so instead he made a law that made it easier for people to register to vote.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>But once the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act, some state legislatures unleashed a flood of laws designed specifically to make voting harder, especially, by the way, state legislatures where there is a lot of minority turnout and population growth. That’s not necessarily a mystery or an accident. It was an attack on what John fought for. It was an attack on our democratic freedoms. And we should treat it as such.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>If politicians want to honor John, and I’m so grateful for the legacy of work of all the Congressional leaders who are here, but there’s a better way than a statement calling him a hero. You want to honor John? Let’s honor him by revitalizing the law that he was willing to die for. And by the way, naming it the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, that is a fine tribute. But John wouldn’t want us to stop there, trying to get back to where we already were. Once we pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, we should keep marching to make it even better.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>By making sure every American </i>[and illegal/undocumented alien through motor-voter picture ID]<i> is automatically registered to vote, including former inmates </i>[recently released from their full sentences due to COVID-19 fears]<i> who’ve earned their second chance.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>By adding polling places, and expanding early voting, and making Election Day a national holiday, so if you are someone who is working in a factory, or you are a single mom who has got to go to her job and doesn’t get time off, you can still cast your ballot.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>By guaranteeing that every American citizen has equal representation in our government, including the American citizens who live in Washington, D.C. and in Puerto Rico. They are Americans.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>By ending some of the partisan </i>[prevalent in decades controlled Democrat Political Party cities & states]<i> gerrymandering — so that all voters have the power to choose their politicians, not the other way around.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>And if all this takes eliminating the filibuster </i>[installed by a Democrat Political Party controlled Congress]<i> — another </i>[instilled Democrat Political Party] <i>Jim Crow relic — in order to secure the God-given rights of every American, then that’s what we should do.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>And yet, even if we do all this — even if every bogus voter suppression law was struck off the books today — we have got to be honest with ourselves that too many of us choose not to exercise the franchise; that too many of our citizens believe their vote won’t make a difference, or they buy into the cynicism that, by the way, is the central strategy of voter suppression, to make you discouraged, to stop believing in your own power.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>So we are also going to have to remember what John said: “If you don’t do everything you can to change things, then they will remain the same. You only pass this way once. You have to give it all you have.” As long as young people are protesting in the streets, hoping real change takes hold, I’m hopeful but we cannot casually abandon them at the ballot box. Not when few elections have been as urgent, on so many levels, as this one. We cannot treat voting as an errand to run if we have some time. We have to treat it as the most important action we can take on behalf of democracy.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Like John, we have to give it all we have.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>I was proud that John Lewis was a friend of mine. I met him when I was in law school. He came to speak and I went up and I said, “Mr. Lewis, you are one of my heroes. What inspired me more than anything as a young man was to see what you and Reverend Lawson and Bob Moses and Diane Nash and others did.” And he got that kind of — aw shucks, thank you very much.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The next time I saw him, I had been elected to the United States Senate. And I told him, “John, I am here because of you.” On Inauguration Day in 2008, 2009, he was one of the first people that I greeted and hugged on that stand. I told him, “This is your day too.”</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>He was a good and kind and gentle man. And he believed in us — even when we don’t believe in ourselves. It’s fitting that the last time John and I shared a public forum was on Zoom. I am pretty sure that neither he nor I set up the Zoom call because we didn’t know how to work it. It was a virtual town hall with a gathering of young activists who had been helping to lead this summer’s demonstrations </i>[and riots that burned buildings led by the Democrat Political Party's storm troops in the Marxist Black Lives Matter Movement and ANTIFA calling for the defunding of police departments across the nation] <i>in the wake of George Floyd’s death. And afterwards, I spoke to John privately, and he could not have been prouder to see this new generation of activists standing up for freedom and equality; a new generation that was intent on voting and protecting the right to vote; in some cases, a new generation running for political office.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>I told him, all those young people, John — of every race and every religion, from every background and gender and sexual orientation — John, those are your</i> [Communist ideals embracing] <i>children. They learned from your example, even if they didn’t always know it. They had understood, through him, what American citizenship</i> [or coddled non-citizenship]<i> requires, even if they had only heard about his courage through the history books </i>[many that now have been banned and replaced]<i>.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>“By the thousands, faceless, anonymous, relentless young people, Black and white … have taken our whole nation back to those great wells of </i>[representative - with Electoral College]<i> democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in the formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.”</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Dr. King said that in the 1960s. And it came true again this summer.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>We see it outside our windows, in big cities and rural towns, in men and women, young and old, straight Americans and LGBTQ Americans, Blacks who long for equal treatment and whites who can no longer accept freedom for themselves while witnessing the subjugation of their fellow Americans. We see it in everybody doing the hard work of overcoming complacency, of overcoming our own fears and our own prejudices, our own hatreds. You see it in people trying to be better, truer versions of ourselves.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>And that’s what John Lewis teaches us. That’s where real courage comes from. Not from turning on each other, but by turning towards one another </i>[in individual freedom and ideas acceptance]<i>. Not by sowing hatred and division, but by spreading love and truth. Not by avoiding our responsibilities to create a better America and a better world, but by embracing those responsibilities with joy and perseverance and discovering that in our beloved community, we do not walk alone.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>What a gift John Lewis was. We are all so lucky to have had him walk with us for a while, and show us the way.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>God bless you all. God bless America. God bless this gentle soul who pulled it closer to its promise.</i><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">[<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/us/obama-eulogy-john-lewis-full-transcript.html" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]</span><br />
<br />
... <a href="https://carters2ndterm.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Carter's Second Term</a>, as the <a href="https://news.yahoo.com/mark-levin-says-barack-obama-015956289.html" target="_blank">failed efforts at a best practices society</a> through multi-cultural tribalism model, by the Racist and Left-Wing Democrat Political Party, continues.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b> <i>Barack Obama, Representative John Lewis, #BHO44, Democrat Political Party, NYT, Ebenezer Baptist Church, eulogy, John Lewis Voting Rights Act, Carter's Second Term</i></span>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-17551839243004106782020-07-28T19:51:00.000-07:002020-07-30T17:45:14.112-07:00In This Age Of Virus Control: Healthcare Professionals Are Not Allowed To Break Through<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEird1MYDuP_6f2AD7PAE2RBma4fVfqBBPHOu8rfM-IIP3UeOddyo_K_ngiRLEhUhi1fAFUYLmnSDJvSUiYRAePUAuuiQVlXarziM-vfnWcj0nOjLSkj0QWCTavbFJjAOiq5kbiKgLhL8uQ/s1600/sscensor+-+coops+corner.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="456" data-original-width="474" height="382" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEird1MYDuP_6f2AD7PAE2RBma4fVfqBBPHOu8rfM-IIP3UeOddyo_K_ngiRLEhUhi1fAFUYLmnSDJvSUiYRAePUAuuiQVlXarziM-vfnWcj0nOjLSkj0QWCTavbFJjAOiq5kbiKgLhL8uQ/s400/sscensor+-+coops+corner.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Should arbitrary censorship be allowed for personal social media and interactive news sites? Image By: Coops Corner</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<b>In This Age Of Virus Control: <a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/" target="_blank">Healthcare Professionals</a> Are Not Allowed To Break Through</b><br />
<br />
There are many in our country who erroneously believe that an invisible virus attack to a Human population is something that can be controlled - a virus can not be controlled.<br />
<br />
What many in our society from healthcare & governmental Central Planners and their sycophants to Big Pharma operatives looking for profit are attempting to do, in the name of COVID-19 bending the curve and infection reduction, is control the sharing of communication through censorship.<br />
<br />
With these people, First Amendment free speech, without editing or censorship right,s only apply to those who speak or share from the narrowly defined intended direction or messaging that will deliver the controlled desired effect, on a population they wish to be controlled, for their own powerful purposes.<br />
<br />
Wither this control be for a direct slavery harnessing of a person's output of labor and intelligence, or for the controlled profit from a prescribed purchase upon which one may be healthy and/or just move about in relative freedom.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" height="315" id="lbry-iframe" src="https://lbry.tv/$/embed/318387587_Press-Conference---America's-Frontline-Doctors-Summit/a60a8f51b0e9037b1aa317521fa3d0e800a1a511?t=280" width="560"></iframe></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i><span style="font-size: x-small;">A video of healthcare workers and doctors in white coats, holding an open press conference from in front of the Supreme Court building, gave testimony on their direct experiences of using widely known and very inexpensive chemical protocols in treating COVID-19 pandemic.<a href="https://www.pulse.ng/news/local/nigerian-medical-directors-tackle-dr-stella-over-claim-that-hydroxychloroquine-cures/mcehkqs" target="_blank"> This video of the event has since caused a major censorship discussion on social media</a> since these very same social media portals that have unilaterally censored discussions about what actually effects our American First Amendment lives.
</span></i></div>
<br />
This excerpted and edited from SF NEWS -<br />
<br />
<b><i>Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Remove Video of 'Doctors' Who Were Denouncing Masks, Promoting Hydroxychloroquine</i></b><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>By: Jay C. Barmann, 28 JULY 2020 / SF NEWS - fiction writer, web editor who's lived in San Francisco for 19 years</i></span><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>A group calling themselves "<b><a href="https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/" target="_blank">America's Frontline Doctors</a></b>," which seems to have been formed two weeks ago and whose website has already disappeared, promoted the insane video via Breitbart News. And in it, these doctors — none of whom is apparently an epidemiologist — stage an official-seeming press conference in which they say things like "you don't need masks" to prevent spread of the coronavirus, and hydroxychloroquine actually works to treat severe cases — both positions that have been debunked by science and actual doctors.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>As CNN reports, President Trump had shared multiple versions of the video on Twitter Monday night before it was removed, and according to Breitbart, the video had racked up 17 million views on Facebook and tens of thousands more on YouTube.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>A lab-coated woman </i>[a trained and employed Doctor born in Africa and familiar with Malaria protocols]<i> in the video claims, "This virus has a cure, it's called hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax," and says that masks aren't necessary because this "cure" exists.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>Facebook didn't manage to remove the video before it racked up millions of views, but ultimately it did. "We've removed this video for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19," a Facebook spokesperson tells CNN, adding that they were alerting people who had commented on or shared the video that these claims have been debunked by the World Health Organization.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Twitter was working to remove multiple versions of the video on Monday night, and YouTube likewise removed the video saying it violated community guidelines.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjylVm_Yyjzly1h80rF-Pk1arGGGqPZ4_nxNN2_pitilRdulu6-Fi2PPKapnk2PtmYQGB5Tojeda9Qm2I89csw-HTMnZASIGWkm_lgkJKIZtL15EkPoCfS1ejmIKS4MXdjsx2AxSzKcve8/s1600/Coronavirus-Infection-Stages_04-07-20.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="735" data-original-width="1291" height="227" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjylVm_Yyjzly1h80rF-Pk1arGGGqPZ4_nxNN2_pitilRdulu6-Fi2PPKapnk2PtmYQGB5Tojeda9Qm2I89csw-HTMnZASIGWkm_lgkJKIZtL15EkPoCfS1ejmIKS4MXdjsx2AxSzKcve8/s400/Coronavirus-Infection-Stages_04-07-20.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Before politics and potentials of profit through a dictated and controlled vaccine path to a potential end of fear-mongering and tyranny in handling COVID-19, this graph shows clearly that a recommended therapeutic approach included what these America's Frontline Doctors were giving testimony on - hydroxychloroquine (over one-billion doses administered since it became an understood therapeutic in the mid 1950s), zinc, and Zithromax. Image Credit: <a href="https://pharma.elsevier.com/covid-19/hydroxychloroquine-and-the-coronavirus-connecting-the-dots-through-the-biology-knowledge-graph/" target="_blank">Elsevier (2020) </a></span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<i>Dr. Simone Gold, a Los Angeles-based emergency medicine specialist, is the supposed leader of "America's Frontline Doctors," and she has previously served as a talking head on Fox News saying that stay-at-home orders aren't necessary. She's also spouted the very Trumpian opinion that there is "no scientific basis that the average American should be concerned" about Covid-19, despite the fact that cases are surging nationwide, young people are dying, and we're about to cross the 150,000 mark of Americans who have died from it.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Another doctor featured in the video, African-born pediatrician</i> [not properly described above]<i> and religious minister Stella Immanuel, gets up and touts the benefits of hydroxychloroquine — claiming to have treated over 300 COVID patients </i>[350] <i>in Houston with the drug to great success</i> [zero deaths and full elimination of the virus]<i>. She is the one making the claim about the "cure" and saying masks and lockdowns aren't necessary. She also has a history of making insane claims about other medical issues, as The Daily Beast </i>[another Left-Wing Media Complex publisher]<i> points out, saying that endometriosis and uterine cysts are caused by people having sex with demons in their dreams. And she reportedly thinks the government is run by aliens.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Somehow, in the ignorant corners of America and Trump's mind, it's still important to make the pandemic into a political fight, while the entire world watches in amusement and horror at how badly this country has bungled the fight against the virus, which knows no political allegiance.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>So, thank you Trump, and thank you "America's Frontline Doctors" for giving voters yet another reason to see you for the venal and immoral people that you are. None of this makes sense except if you are a moron who believes that every other news organization in the world besides Fox and Breitbart is lying for some unfathomable reason, and down is up and the sky is green.</i><br />
[<a href="https://sfist.com/2020/07/28/facebook-twitter-and-youtube-remove-video-of-doctors/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
The national responses to this COVID-19/Wuhan Red Death pandemic from China in <a href="https://www.trialsitenews.com/large-french-real-world-observational-study-reveals-hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin-associated-with-reduction-in-hospitalization-death-for-covid-19-patients/" target="_blank"><b>France</b></a> and <a href="https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/pharma/why-icmr-continues-to-stand-firm-on-using-hydroxychloroquine-as-prophylaxis/76172274" target="_blank"><b>India</b></a> have experienced the similar positive results of shutting down the infectious effects of this highly contagious corona-virus through the use of hydroxychloroquine (over one-billion doses administered since it became an understood therapeutic in the mid 1950s), zinc, and Zithromax.<br />
<br />
Censorship will not allow an honest depiction of what these Doctors and Healthcare professionals had attempted to do by adding their testimony to this highly charged, Left-Wing controlled, communications atmosphere during an election year.<br />
<br />
Especially ... when decidedly slanted reviews and vindictive as posted here by SF NEWS isn't subjected to the same confining structure in communication.<br />
<br />
What can we expect in this age of virus control during the Democrat Political Party's continuing prosecution of post #BHO44 - Carter's Second Term.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b><i> hydroxychloroquine, zinc, Zithromax, COVID-19, therapeutic, treatment, First Amendment, free speech, Carter's Second Term, #BHO44</i></span>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-84474532391829793002020-06-30T18:29:00.001-07:002020-06-30T18:29:12.587-07:00COVID-911: A Wuhan Red Death Story<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" height="315" src="https://lbry.tv/$/embed/COVID-911----Conspiracy-Worth-Listening-To/231226a2d66bfd05727dac8e1c7be557e30217e6" width="560"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
<b>COVID-911: A Wuhan Red Death Story</b><br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Story line and landmark travels through the Novel Coronavirus, COVID-19, health event that has shaped the experiences endured by people living in these United States. Watch this video to gain an insight about why the world is in chaos right now.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
#DJT45 has been ten steps ahead of all the DEEP STATE players and their attempt to throw this world into a Cloward & Piven strategy of chaos and bring in their dream of a Globalist ideal of The New World Order. Some have termed this health event, turned political takeover ... COVID-1984. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Segoe UI, Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, Apple Color Emoji, Segoe UI Emoji, Segoe UI Symbol;">The CDC states COVID-19, the Wuhan Virus, if caught, has an overall survivable rate of 99.74% - or the converse of the morbidity (death) rate of 0.26% - less than 3/10ths of 1 percent. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
The Control Freaks can’t stop what’s coming.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS: </b><i>Novel Coronavirus, COVID-19, <span style="background-color: transparent;">Wuhan Red Death, China, CDC, World Health Organization, Left-Wing, </span>DEEP STATE, #DJT45, <span style="background-color: transparent;">Carter's Second Term</span></i></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: none; box-sizing: inherit; color: #111111; font-family: Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 16px; margin-top: var(--spacing-m); outline: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-8242266462889224992020-05-08T20:12:00.000-07:002020-05-08T22:06:06.861-07:00Former VP Joe Biden Channels 80's Cyber Character Max Headroom<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7fqryOqtV06GM7InRTnKR9s7ZY9HebmnASHFilhfpyaGcbuLyh2ZCmWLsOGVeQt_O_1NAZuniwnnSod6eiRUp8BwJ7R8WyEDHKvIQ127ZOh0T3Ec241qevVVa78Rg6rPx-jZqYQLzXKo/s1600/Capture+-+Joe+Biden+Virtual+Rally+-+Max+Headroom+-+1+-+570.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="292" data-original-width="570" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7fqryOqtV06GM7InRTnKR9s7ZY9HebmnASHFilhfpyaGcbuLyh2ZCmWLsOGVeQt_O_1NAZuniwnnSod6eiRUp8BwJ7R8WyEDHKvIQ127ZOh0T3Ec241qevVVa78Rg6rPx-jZqYQLzXKo/s1600/Capture+-+Joe+Biden+Virtual+Rally+-+Max+Headroom+-+1+-+570.png" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i style="font-size: 12.8px;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The figure of Joe Biden breaks up during a live presentation of a COVID-19 social distancing consciousness campaign rally. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via Snipping Tool (2020) </span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<b>Former VP Joe Biden Channels 80's Cyber Character Max Headroom</b><br />
<br />
So here we go - future elected head of the Democrat Political Party, Joe Biden, as its candidate to run against the sitting 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, held a COVID-19 virtual campaign rally on the interwebs from Tampa Bay, Florida.<br />
<br />
Many who must have planned this, said to themselves, what a great idea because we can get our nominee some face time with potential voters in an important swing state. The campaign contacted local station WTSP, virtual and VHF digital channel 10, a CBS-affiliated television station licensed to St. Petersburg, Florida, United States that also serves the community of Tampa Bay. <br />
<br />
This is what they had posted at their YouTube site:<br />
<br />
Joe Biden holds virtual rally for Tampa, Florida | 10 Tampa Bay<br />
71,933 views • Streamed live on May 7, 2020 - 10 Tampa Bay - 28.3K subscribers<br />
<br />
Social-distancing limitations are preventing candidates from holding crowded campaign rallies, so former Vice President Joe Biden is hosting a virtual rally for people in Tampa. Earlier today, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee held a virtual roundtable with community leaders in Jacksonville. <br />
<br />
►Subscribe: https://on.wtsp.com/youtube<br />
►Website: https://www.wtsp.com/<br />
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/10TampaBay<br />
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/10TampaBay<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nt56RMbpq_0" width="560"></iframe></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>No! This isn't the virtual rally, but Max Headroom, an '80's television comedy character actually ends up being more coherent in this over seven minute clip than everyone in the nearly forty-five minute Biden virtual campaign rally.</i></span></div>
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from FOX 13 News -</b><br />
<br />
<i>Biden's virtual rally for Tampa falters, plagued by technical issues</i><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>By Evan Axelbank - FOX 13 News</i></span><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The era of virtual campaigning did not start well for Joe Biden.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>A 45-minute rally targeted at a Tampa audience did not go as planned, as it was rife with poor audio quality, choppy video, and a candidate who wasn't even sure when he was on camera.</i><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ABEE2PEfbb8" width="560"></iframe></div>
<br />
<i>For just under 10 minutes</i> [starting at 37:00 minutes],<i> the former vice president spoke from a Florida-like setting at his home in Delaware.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Virtual rallies are a way for the presumptive Democratic nominee to target areas that will be crucial for his White House run, while still practicing social distancing.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>"In the thick of this crisis, Florida has the worst rate of fulfilling unemployment claims of any state in the country," Biden said. "It's no surprise, the unemployment system was allowed to be hollowed out by Gov. Scott in 2011."</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>His theme: President Trump isn't equipped to handle a pandemic.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>"This crisis is revealing so much about our society, including just how critical it is to have competence in government," Biden said.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpbH1GdTtUpkgdDBFPlZyBLmdPOzgJV-L-iKEy-rA5mCnF6naxrRektf7ZXxjR0Q-JbVd92F8kOLBm1HJx64pxfQDObD2tr5qZhi97i1IwOEvI1R6hvdus_t5IVY_hyBfQm3gSp6BGui4/s1600/Capture+-+Joe+Biden+Virtual+Rally+-+Max+Headroom+FB+POSTING.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="380" data-original-width="553" height="273" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpbH1GdTtUpkgdDBFPlZyBLmdPOzgJV-L-iKEy-rA5mCnF6naxrRektf7ZXxjR0Q-JbVd92F8kOLBm1HJx64pxfQDObD2tr5qZhi97i1IwOEvI1R6hvdus_t5IVY_hyBfQm3gSp6BGui4/s400/Capture+-+Joe+Biden+Virtual+Rally+-+Max+Headroom+FB+POSTING.PNG" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Facebook entry on a timeline that reflects this author's instant impression of what he had witnessed on a report showing the video internet NETCODE effected glitches of Joe Biden's virtual campaign rally. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via Snipping Tool 2020</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<i>At one point, about 2,600 were watching live on YouTube, though the number dropped to about 2,000 as the tech problems went on, which included a six-minute period of black screen during the warm-up speakers.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Before the rally, the Trump campaign held a conference call with reporters and one of their main points is that they consider their digital outreach efforts far ahead of the Biden campaign's.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>"We are absolutely crushing it here on the ground in Florida and we are not going to stop," said Florida GOP chair Joe Gruters.</i><br />
<br />
<i>After the rally, the Biden campaign declined to answer any further questions about the technical issues.</i><br />
[<a href="https://www.fox13news.com/news/bidens-virtual-rally-for-tampa-falters-plagued-by-technical-issues" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
One can only suspect that most of the folks on the Joe Biden 2020 campaign staff never saw Max Headroom, for it would have provided some instant levity, call it the riches of embarrassment, in a dismal display of political professionalism.<br />
<br />
This Democrat Political Party era will always be known here, and in the hearts and minds of embarrassed, yet well meaning Democrats, as Carter's Second Term.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b> <i>Joe Biden, Tampa Bay, 10 Tampa, WTSP, CBS, FOX 13, virtual, cyber, digital, NETCODE, political campaign, Democrat Political Party, Max Headroom, Carter's Second Term</i></span>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com111450 Gandy Blvd N, St. Petersburg, FL 33702, USA27.8710188 -82.61585382.3489843000000015 -123.9244478 53.393053300000005 -41.3072598tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-17888105488746970932020-05-06T15:32:00.002-07:002020-06-28T07:53:08.297-07:00Problem-Reaction-Solution: Death Of A Free Society Through Healthcare Part One<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEwARM_dsZf-z3w_3-lguuVo8WxLCmTNF7y0_P6lHtbnTTTvRkN0FVZyGwNG6FGZ0OGtJBQAVQUL6XtrOMTxdio7QTbwR-svkXfkgel-b-KlWVPfZ98cARIUnw9CZKHlBfWmGyxAfp190/s1600/Capture+-+Makovits+and+Willis+-+walking+-+565px.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="313" data-original-width="565" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEwARM_dsZf-z3w_3-lguuVo8WxLCmTNF7y0_P6lHtbnTTTvRkN0FVZyGwNG6FGZ0OGtJBQAVQUL6XtrOMTxdio7QTbwR-svkXfkgel-b-KlWVPfZ98cARIUnw9CZKHlBfWmGyxAfp190/s1600/Capture+-+Makovits+and+Willis+-+walking+-+565px.PNG" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Documentary subject Dr. Judy Mikowits PhD as she talks with interviewer/producer Mikki Willis as they explore the nature of vaccines and how a culture has come to lead to this COVID-19 pandemic event point in time occurance. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via PlandemicMovie.com (2020)</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<b>Problem-Reaction-Solution: Death Of A Free Society Through Healthcare Part One</b><br />
<br />
The reason for this posting here at Carter's Second Term is to assure that a version of the premade segments that are being used to promote an informational movie get published broadly on our interwebs. The original YouTube posting of this video was taken down by YouTube for reasons that will make themselves very clear once one has viewed the video posting.<br />
<br />
The doctor interviewed in this video, Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD began to have real problems communicating what she was discovering, to the world, in 2011 during the Barack H. Obama Administration - hence Carter's Second Term.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" height="315" src="https://lbry.tv/$/embed/Problem-Reaction-Solution----PLANDEMIC-(pt.-1-Judy-Mikovits)/c8d04b068e6f8ba8599e7fa5fdd2196d9e9618a3" width="560"></iframe></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br />
<i><b><a href="https://sbynews.blogspot.com/2020/05/charles-ortel-is-closing-in-silence-of.html?fbclid=IwAR0BOpTZDknCG274jsdRwbgLDoLfx1BCSsbm7I-sA0eRrL1V5dYSaGCst_o" target="_blank">ADDITIONALLY, WATCH NEW INTERVIEW VIDEO HERE</a></b></i></div>
<br />
Interviewed by Producer | Cinematographer | Director Mikki Willis, Dr. Mikovits delivers a very stirring personal account of the biggest trial in her medical professional life, how does one communicate about a culture that has created a structure to eliminate a pursuit of best practices over Human activity, mass control, and extreme profit?<br />
<br />
If this presentation is of interest to you, enough to be able to archive a copy of this video for sharing and additional viewing, please go to <a href="https://plandemicmovie.com/">Plandemic Movie dot com</a> and download a MP4 version for your files.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
[5/7/2020 UPDATE - most all video assets have been taken down]</div>
<br />
Since this 20 minute plus Part 1 featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD is the first of several promotional interest presentations, there will be more to come before the feature length Plandemic Movie is released in SUMMER 2020.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgb04jHyJY1ny8C3pEu2tt7bTg0H73cMNCNFEsydXamE7zj9z7HBy61j0EZJdnmGaQtzqsAadolJ7yXUsDk9pG7AMBMEiPMivT1xC9VmpbA1fK-qIxINi2ThC2O6eZBhuPMcKQ84oH07Iw/s1600/Capture+-+Plague+Of+Corruption.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="486" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgb04jHyJY1ny8C3pEu2tt7bTg0H73cMNCNFEsydXamE7zj9z7HBy61j0EZJdnmGaQtzqsAadolJ7yXUsDk9pG7AMBMEiPMivT1xC9VmpbA1fK-qIxINi2ThC2O6eZBhuPMcKQ84oH07Iw/s400/Capture+-+Plague+Of+Corruption.PNG" width="277" /></a></div>
<br />
<b><a href="http://plaguethebook.com/" target="_blank">Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science</a></b> - Book by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively - Released for sale on April 14, 2020<br />
<br />
<b>About the Authors:</b><br />
Kent Heckenlively, JD, is a former attorney, a founding editor of Age of Autism, and a science teacher. During college Heckenlively worked for US Senator Pete Wilson, and in law school he was a writer and an editor of the school’s law review and spent his summers working for the US Attorney’s Office in San Francisco. Kent and his wife Linda live in Northern California with their two children, Jacqueline and Ben.<br />
<br />
Judy Mikovits, PhD, spent twenty years at the National Cancer Institute, working with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founding fathers of human retrovirology, and has coauthored more than forty scientific papers. She co-founded and directed the first neuroimmune disease institute using a systems biology approach in 2006. Dr. Mikovits lives in Southern California with her husband, David.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Plague-Corruption-Restoring-Promise-Science/dp/1510752242" target="_blank">AVAILABLE Here</a> - Please Read Editorial Reviews >>><br />
<br />
Everyone knows, we have never left the control and corruption of ... Carter's Second Term!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b> <i>Mikki Willis, Dr. Mikovits PhD, Vaccine, COVID-19, Human activity, mass control, extreme profit, Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO, CDC, Bill Gates, UN, Carter's Second Term, Plandemic, Summer 2020</i></span>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-36496882156673817112019-02-19T07:31:00.002-08:002019-02-19T20:56:29.361-08:00Obama's DEEP STATE Unravels & Fails At Every Turn Says Historian Victor Davis Hanson<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjohM5_INYBESYLfbT74rsoECH2JF2WLzCbbScOEQ8vxJvsni3DuNxFCKCEW6rm_xoXNnlFyUNqSaSMQWVqi4teXmGduvNXm__8WSXixQHh3iFJi1H7XjLPWec85IW0a81YQCpMvISje5o/s1600/TRUMP+Surf%2527s+Red+Wave.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="960" data-original-width="929" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjohM5_INYBESYLfbT74rsoECH2JF2WLzCbbScOEQ8vxJvsni3DuNxFCKCEW6rm_xoXNnlFyUNqSaSMQWVqi4teXmGduvNXm__8WSXixQHh3iFJi1H7XjLPWec85IW0a81YQCpMvISje5o/s400/TRUMP+Surf%2527s+Red+Wave.jpg" width="386" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">#DJT45 riding the legacy of the Barack H. Obama Executive Branch tidal wave of political corruption. <br />Image Credit: Doug Giles via Facebook</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b><br /></b>
<b>Obama's DEEP STATE Unravels & Fails At Every Turn Says Historian Victor Davis Hanson</b><br />
<br />
We find ourselves two years and one month post the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama and its final overt vestiges are finally beginning to implode and end their effectiveness.<br />
<br />
Our country, which faced a choice of having a one-party political rule - Democrat Political Party with the strong support of Establishment Republican Political Party protecting the back door - elected blue-collar billionaire Donald J. Trump against all odds and federal government power with the forceful aid of the Left-Wing Media & Entertainment Complex.<br />
<br />
Recently, Andrew McCabe, who served as the Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from February 2016 to January 2018 and from May 9, 2017, to August 2, 2017, served as the Acting Director of the FBI following James Comey's dismissal by President Donald Trump, was interviewed by 60 Minutes with revelations about the conspiracy within the FBI that is now falling apart.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmHnDEB11xvTyhhU33hKRN9u68tqxKXoCN3ZUC7r-2zteyRlorAhTlD2MVJ-ErieyUtVgZXZ59Y-LL9V0DmCWOdwXkH6Lrb8VAC7jNBD5ITremzDu7Dgdx-P8sEGwuONs7OiGqpZThtkY/s1600/Obama+Portrait+With+P-Hat+-+1_Fotor.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="433" data-original-width="800" height="216" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmHnDEB11xvTyhhU33hKRN9u68tqxKXoCN3ZUC7r-2zteyRlorAhTlD2MVJ-ErieyUtVgZXZ59Y-LL9V0DmCWOdwXkH6Lrb8VAC7jNBD5ITremzDu7Dgdx-P8sEGwuONs7OiGqpZThtkY/s400/Obama+Portrait+With+P-Hat+-+1_Fotor.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">The attitude held by the Democrat Political Party today. Resistance and division continues to be pursued within the Federal Government and by the political leadership still headed by the former president Barack H. Obama.<br />Image Credit: Facebook Timeline</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
This has been a long process initiated by those at the very top of the leadership of the Democrat Political Party and these efforts began well before the election cycle of 2016, and continued in its effort to oust a duly elected opposition President through the following elements analyzed and diagnosed by <a href="https://amgreatness.com/author/victor-davis-hanson/" target="_blank">Victor Davis Hanson</a>:<br />
<br />
<b>Preparing the Battlefield - Weaponizing the Deep State - The Mueller Investigation - The Palace Coup</b><br />
<br />
This excerpted and edited from American Greatness by historian Victor Davis Hanson -<br />
<br />
<b><i>Autopsy of a Dead Coup</i></b><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>February 17th, 2019</i></span><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The illegal effort to destroy the 2016 Trump campaign by Hillary Clinton campaign’s use of funds to create, disseminate among court media, and then salt among high Obama administration officials, a fabricated, opposition smear dossier failed.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>So has the second special prosecutor phase of the coup to abort the Trump presidency failed. There are many elements to what in time likely will become recognized as the greatest scandal in American political history, marking the first occasion in which U.S. government bureaucrats sought to overturn an election and to remove a sitting U.S. president.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-UvC-8ABhsJaO32ArG6jCQQcYmwR60Lp2dA_n38khl_boZGqwQFGoLSW7vW3xNkJh2gId0xq0vexsUzGs_JtUC1SrX85kt-LznLFNqQEB8v81F4dntufYG3sz1cVHveQKthtBeBQ6HMM/s1600/Hillary%2527s+Incivility+Threat+-+2018+Midterms.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1076" data-original-width="1440" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-UvC-8ABhsJaO32ArG6jCQQcYmwR60Lp2dA_n38khl_boZGqwQFGoLSW7vW3xNkJh2gId0xq0vexsUzGs_JtUC1SrX85kt-LznLFNqQEB8v81F4dntufYG3sz1cVHveQKthtBeBQ6HMM/s400/Hillary%2527s+Incivility+Threat+-+2018+Midterms.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">A Hitch Cartoon. Image Credit: Facebook Timeline</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><br /></i>
<b><i>Preparing the Battlefield</i></b><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>No palace coup can take place without the perception of popular anger at a president.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The deep state is by nature cowardly. It does not move unless it feels it can disguise its subterranean efforts or that, if revealed, those efforts will be seen as popular and necessary—as expressed in tell-all book titles such as fired FBI Directors James Comey’s Higher Loyalty or in disgraced Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s psychodramatic The Threat.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>In candidate and President Trump’s case that prepping of the battlefield translated into a coordinated effort among the media, political progressives and celebrities to so demonize Trump that his imminent removal likely would appear a relief to the people. Anything was justified that led to that end.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>All through the 2016 campaign and during the first two years of the Trump presidency the media’s treatment, according to liberal adjudicators of press coverage, ran about 90 percent negative toward Trump—a landmark bias that continues today.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Journalists themselves consulted with the Clinton campaign to coordinate attacks. From the Wikileaks trove, journalistic grandees such as John Harwood, Mark Leibovich, Dana Milbank, and Glenn Thrush often communicated (and even post factum were unapologetic about doing so) with John Podesta’s staff to construct various anti-Trump themes and have the Clinton campaign review or even audit them in advance.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Some contract “journalists” apparently were paid directly by Fusion GPS—created by former reporters Glen Simpson of the Wall Street Journal and Susan Schmidt of the Washington Post—to spread lurid stories from the dossier. Others more refined like Christiane Amanpour and James Rutenberg had argued for a new journalistic ethos that partisan coverage was certainly justified in the age of Trump, given his assumed existential threat to The Truth. Or as Rutenberg put it in 2016: “If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, non-opinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable. But the question that everyone is grappling with is: Do normal standards apply? And if they don’t, what should take their place?”</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>I suppose Rutenberg never considered that half the country might have considered the Hillary Clinton presidency “potentially dangerous,” and yet did not expect the evening news, in 90 percent of its coverage, to reflect such suspicions.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The Democratic National Committee’s appendages often helped to massage CNN news coverage—such as Donna Brazile’s primary debate tip-off to the Clinton campaign or CNN’s consultation with the DNC about forming talking points for a scheduled Trump interview.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>So-called “bombshell,” “watershed,” “turning-point,” and “walls closing in” fake news aired in 24-hour news bulletin cycles. The media went from fabrications about Trump’s supposed removal of the bust of Martin Luther King, Jr. from the Oval Office, to the mythologies in the Steele dossier, to lies about the Trump Tower meeting, to assurances that Michael Cohen would testify to Trump’s suborning perjury, and on and on.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>CNN soon proved that it is no longer a news organization at all—as reporters like Gloria Borger, Chris Cuomo, Eric Lichtblau, Manu Raju, Brian Rokus, Jake Tapper, Jeff Zeleny, and teams such as Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein, and Marshall Cohen as well as Thomas Frank, and Lex Harris all trafficked in false rumors and unproven gossip detrimental to Trump, while hosts and guest hosts such as Reza Aslan, the late Anthony Bourdain, and Anderson Cooper stooped to obscenity and grossness to attack Trump.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Both politicos and celebrities tried to drive Trump’s numbers down to facilitate some sort of popular ratification for his removal. Hollywood and the coastal corridor punditry exhausted public expressions of assassinating or injuring the president, as the likes of Jim Carrey, Johnny Depp, Robert de Niro, Peter Fonda, Kathy Griffin, Madonna, Snoop Dogg, and a host of others vied rhetorically to slice apart, shoot, beat up, cage, behead, and blow up the president.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Left wing social media and mainstream journalism spread sensational lies about supposed maniacal Trump supporters in MAGA hats. They constructed fantasies that veritable white racists were now liberated to run amuck insulting and beating up people of color as they taunted the poor and victimized minorities with vicious Trump sloganeering—even as the Covington farce and now the even more embarrassing Jussie Smollett charade evaporated without apologies from the media and progressive merchants of such hate.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>At the same time, liberal attorneys, foundations, Democratic politicians, and progressive activists variously sued to overturn the election on false charges of rigged voting machines. They sought to subvert the Electoral College. They introduced articles of impeachment. They sued to remove Trump under the Emoluments Clause. They attempted to invoke the 25th Amendment. And they even resurrected the ossified Logan Act—before focusing on the appointment of a special counsel to discredit the Trump presidency. Waiting for the 2020 election was seen as too quaint.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhegamR9yhu_cxbraFsfTxQGRFko11Krvtns67i4fHS7l3gGolVktGedU69I8x6o5-Ye7g8P_-I2mmysdtFj5LG6mfnAuQK81bQvnu3cdGUaFNuFhS5vgGRyxzFyOlBz-jBmlQj5_ImREs/s1600/TRUMP+-+Circular+Proof+Of+DEEP+STATE+-+intelligence-laundry-4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="474" data-original-width="640" height="296" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhegamR9yhu_cxbraFsfTxQGRFko11Krvtns67i4fHS7l3gGolVktGedU69I8x6o5-Ye7g8P_-I2mmysdtFj5LG6mfnAuQK81bQvnu3cdGUaFNuFhS5vgGRyxzFyOlBz-jBmlQj5_ImREs/s400/TRUMP+-+Circular+Proof+Of+DEEP+STATE+-+intelligence-laundry-4.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Faked information used to create the illusion of actual muli-sourced verification of real information through leaks to a compliant 4th Estate in order to have permission to spy on a competitive political campaign via the Department Of Justice through the FISA Warrant process. Image Credit: Facebook Timeline</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><br /></i>
<b><i>Weaponizing the Deep State</i></b><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>During the 2016 election, the Obama Department of Justice warped the Clinton email scandal investigation, from Bill Clinton’s secret meeting on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, to unethical immunity given to the unveracious Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, to James Comey’s convoluted predetermined treatment of “likely winner” Clinton, and to DOJ’s Bruce Ohr’s flagrant conflict of interests in relation to Fusion GPS.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>About a dozen FBI and DOJ grandees have now resigned, retired, been fired, or reassigned for unethical and likely illegal behavior—and yet have not faced criminal indictments. The reputation of the FBI as venerable agency is all but wrecked. Its administrators variously have libeled the Trump voters, expressed hatred for Trump, talked of “insurance policies” in ending the Trump candidacy, and inserted informants into the Trump campaign.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The former Obama directors of the CIA and National Intelligence, with security clearances intact, hit the television airways as paid “consultants” and almost daily accused the sitting president of Russian collusion and treason—without cross-examination or notice that both previously had lied under oath to Congress (and did so without subsequent legal exposure), and both were likely knee-deep in the dissemination of the Steele dossier among Obama administration officials.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>John Brennan’s CIA likely helped to spread the Fusion GPS dossier among elected and administrative state officials. Some in the NSC in massive and unprecedented fashion requested the unmasking of surveilled names of Trump subordinates, and then illegally leaked them to the press.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The FISA courts, fairly or not, are now mostly discredited, given they either were willingly or naively hoodwinked by FBI and DOJ officials who submitted as chief evidence for surveillance on American citizens, an unverified dossier—without disclosure that the bought campaign hit-piece was paid for by Hillary Clinton, authored by a discredited has-been British agent, relied on murky purchased Russian sources, and used in circular fashion to seed news accounts of supposed Trump misbehavior.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAiuIe_isfS0FEwcs_Fqn6l9Xqca-xPSB5w4O6C2oYWxWQ_AkwpZLWzkZmN5mm0w9pRG7KFNSItAE2xxgsBhHZgm9JtHXucg5jn2s__aUGcslPON-jK5BzEnBjLJcE3sIy2JfwUho6l5I/s1600/TRUMP+-+The-Russia-Hoax_Fotor+-+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="517" data-original-width="800" height="257" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAiuIe_isfS0FEwcs_Fqn6l9Xqca-xPSB5w4O6C2oYWxWQ_AkwpZLWzkZmN5mm0w9pRG7KFNSItAE2xxgsBhHZgm9JtHXucg5jn2s__aUGcslPON-jK5BzEnBjLJcE3sIy2JfwUho6l5I/s400/TRUMP+-+The-Russia-Hoax_Fotor+-+1.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">DEEP STATE friends hire friends to take on the post election effort to oust a duly elected sitting POTUS. Much of the facts that led up to the appointment of a Special Counsel investigation without a crime are detailed in the book by Gregg Jarrett, The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump.<br />Image Credit: Barnes and Noble </span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><br /></i>
<b><i>The Mueller Investigation</i></b><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The Crown Jewel in the coup was the appointment of special counsel Robert Muller to discover supposed 2016 Trump-Russian election collusion. Never has any special investigation been so ill-starred from its conception.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Mueller’s appointment was a result of his own friend James Comey’s bitter stunt of releasing secret, confidential and even classified memos of presidential conversations. Acting DOJ Attorney Rod Rosenstein appointed a former colleague Mueller—although as a veteran himself of the Clinton email scandal investigations and the FISA fraudulent writ requests, Rosenstein was far more conflicted than was the recused Attorney General Jeff Sessions.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Mueller then packed his investigative team with lots of Clinton donors and partisans, some of whom had legally represented Clinton subordinates and even the Clinton Foundation or voiced support for anti-Trump movements.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Mueller himself and Andrew Weissmann have had a long record of investigatory and prosecutorial overreach that had on occasion resulted in government liability and court mandated federal restitution. In such polarized times, neither should have involved in such an investigation. Two subordinate FBI investigators were caught earlier on conducting an affair over their FBI-issued cell phones, and during the election cycle they slurred the object of their subsequent investigation, ridiculed Trump voters, and bragged that Trump would never be elected. Mueller later staggered, and then hid for weeks the reasons for, their respective firings.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The team soon discovered there was no Trump-Russian 2016 election collusion—and yet went ahead to leverage Trump campaign subordinates on process crimes in hopes of finding some culpability in Trump’s past 50-year business, legal, and tax records. The point was not to find who colluded with whom (if it had been, then Hillary Clinton would be now indicted for illegally hiring with campaign funds a foreign national to buy foreign fabrications to discredit her opponent), but to find the proper mechanism to destroy the presumed guilty Donald Trump.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The Mueller probe has now failed in that gambit of proving “collusion” (as even progressive investigative reporters and some FBI investigators had predicted), but succeeded brilliantly in two ways.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The “counterintelligence” investigation subverted two years of the Trump presidency by constant leaks that Trump soon would be indicted, jailed, disgraced, or impeached. As a result, Trump’s stellar economic and foreign policy record would never earn fifty percent of public support.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Second, Mueller’s preemptive attacks offered an effective offensive defense for the likely felonious behavior of John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok, and a host of others. While the Mueller lawyers threatened to destroy the lives of bit players like Jerome Corsi, George Papadopoulos, and Roger Stone, they de facto provided exemption to a host of the Washington hierarchy who had lied under oath, obstructed justice, illegally leaked to the press, unmasked and leaked names of surveilled Americans, and misled federal courts under the guise of a “higher loyalty” to the cause of destroying Donald J. Trump.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD-iJUCJx83X4CnznliaytJnqNzg9JJ7lwYr_v5ViJMDDubEkvbCgsZ0uhD7MJknEexaCKnh-7fG6C1lHc0Rbpg1pIl5vXSfDfAXYTKLI2rrM8CKE5Eg12_ncVP5Ye3WFFX-AHw0UhsV4/s1600/TRUMP+-+58+Democrats+That+Voted+For+Trump+Impeachment.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="441" data-original-width="319" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD-iJUCJx83X4CnznliaytJnqNzg9JJ7lwYr_v5ViJMDDubEkvbCgsZ0uhD7MJknEexaCKnh-7fG6C1lHc0Rbpg1pIl5vXSfDfAXYTKLI2rrM8CKE5Eg12_ncVP5Ye3WFFX-AHw0UhsV4/s400/TRUMP+-+58+Democrats+That+Voted+For+Trump+Impeachment.jpg" width="288" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">Listing of the 58 Democrat Political Party representatives in the House Of Congress that voted to oust the 45th President Of The United States, Donald J. Trump - a Nay vote equaled a yes vote to impeach.<br />Image Credit: Facebook Timeline</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><br /></i>
<b><i>The Palace Coup</i></b><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>All of the above came to a head with the firing of the chronic leaker FBI Director James Comey (who would lie to the president about his not being a target of an FBI investigation, lie to House investigatory committees by pleading amnesia and ignorance on 245 occasions, and repeatedly lie to his own FBI bureaucrats).</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>In May 2017, acting FBI director Andrew McCabe took over from the fired Comey. His candidate wife recently had been a recipient of huge Clinton-related campaign PAC donations shortly before he began investigating the Clinton email scandal. McCabe would soon be cited by the Inspector General for lying to federal investigators on numerous occasions—cynically stooping even to lie to his own New York FBI subordinates to invest scarce resources to hunt for their own nonexistent leaks as a mechanism for disguising his own quite real and illegal leaking.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The newly promoted McCabe apparently felt that it was his moment to become famous for taking out a now President Trump. Thus, he assembled a FBI and DOJ cadre to open a counterintelligence investigation of the sitting president on no other grounds but the fumes of an evaporating Clinton opposition dossier and perceived anger among the FBI that their director had just been fired. In addition, apparently now posing as Andrew McCabe, MD, he informally head counted how many of Trump’s own cabinet members could be convinced by McCabe’s own apparent medical expertise to help remove the president on grounds of physical and mental incapacity under the 25th Amendment. This was an attempted, albeit pathetic, coup against an elected president and the first really in the history of the United States.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>At one point, McCabe claims that the acting Attorney General of the United States Rod Rosenstein volunteered to wear a wire to entrap his boss President Trump—in the manner of Trump’s own attorney Michael Cohen’s entrapment of Trump, in the manner of James Comey taking entrapment notes on confidential Trump one-on-one meetings and leaking them to the press, and in the manner of the Department of Justice surveilling Trump subordinates through FISA and other court authorizations.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>McCabe was iconic of an utterly corrupt FBI Washington hierarchy, which we now know from the behavior of its disgraced and departed leadership. They posed as patriotic scouts, but in reality proved themselves arrogant, smug, and incompetent. They harbored such a sense of superiority that they were convinced they could act outside the law in reifying an “insurance policy” that would end the Trump presidency.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>The thinking of the conspirators initially had been predicated on three assumptions thematic during this three-year long government effort to destroy Trump:</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>One, during 2016, Hillary Clinton would certainly win the election and FBI and DOJ unethical and illegal behavior would be forgotten if not rewarded, given the Clintons’ own signature transgressions and proven indifference to the law;</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Two, Trump was so controversial and the fabricated dossier was so vile and salacious, that seeded rumors of Trump’s faked perversity gave them de facto exemptions to do whatever they damned pleased;</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Three, Trump’s low polls, his controversial reset of American policy, and the general contempt in which he was held by the bipartisan coastal elite, celebrities, and the deep state, meant that even illegal means to continue the campaign-era effort to destroy Trump and now abort his presidency were felt to be moral and heroic acts without legal consequences, and the media would see the conspirators as heroes.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>In sum, the Left and the administrative state, in concert with the media, after failing to stop the Trump campaign, regrouped. They ginned up a media-induced public hysteria, with the residue of the Hillary Clinton campaign’s illegal opposition research, and manipulated it to put in place a special counsel, stocked with partisans.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Then, not thugs in sunglasses and epaulettes, not oligarchs in private jets, not shaggy would-be Marxists, but sanctimonious arrogant bureaucrats in suits and ties used their government agencies to seek to overturn the 2016 election, abort a presidency, and subvert the U.S. Constitution. And they did all that and more on the premise that they were our moral superiors and had uniquely divine rights to destroy a presidency that they loathed.</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Shame on all these failed conspirators and their abettors, and may these immoral people finally earn a long deserved legal and moral reckoning.</i><br />
[<a href="https://amgreatness.com/2019/02/17/autopsy-of-a-dead-coup/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
We, at Carter's Second Term (the #BHO44 Administration which seems to never end), have this (these immoral people finally earn a long deserved legal and moral reckoning) as our over-riding hope, but know that the tentacles of those in Federal Government power will do everything to keep this power at all costs, even at the destruction of the founding documents of our grand experiment in human self-reliance and individual power over mob rule that allows the United States to remain that shining city on the hill.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b> <i>Victor Davis Hanson, VDH, Coup, DEEP STATE, FBI, DOJ, CIA, Barack Obama, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, John Brennan, John Podesta, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Donald J. Trump, Carter's Second Term</i></span>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com01600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, USA38.8976763 -77.03652979999998312.4902418 -118.34512079999999 65.3051108 -35.727938799999983tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-75622779892538504252018-06-18T18:31:00.001-07:002018-06-23T11:11:26.864-07:00Will The 44th Presidency's, Carter's Second Term, FBI Ever Be Trusted Again?<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizOc__z0m3-LOUowGBSdeo07g_L95HpytHPeqFC7VeiXzj8suzYnjI4o4TC_824-e2O-tmzZQgsTsyjKSmqviYwOsgBbo07sVCre8m_ZwGbNvExJ3-8Wj2NzMO4UKpUVOg5Zhk6MOSg_8/s1600/Capture+-+Tucker+Carlson+-+FBI+Trust+2_Fotor.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="431" data-original-width="800" height="215" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizOc__z0m3-LOUowGBSdeo07g_L95HpytHPeqFC7VeiXzj8suzYnjI4o4TC_824-e2O-tmzZQgsTsyjKSmqviYwOsgBbo07sVCre8m_ZwGbNvExJ3-8Wj2NzMO4UKpUVOg5Zhk6MOSg_8/s400/Capture+-+Tucker+Carlson+-+FBI+Trust+2_Fotor.png" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>Former FBI official: the Bureau has become corrupted by ideology and ego... and there's growing discontent among the rank and file (<a href="https://www.facebook.com/TuckerCarlsonTonight/videos/654599358208720/" target="_blank">VIDEO</a>). Image Credit: Tucker Carlson via FB (2018)</i></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<b>Will The 44th Presidency's, <a href="https://carters2ndterm.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Carter's Second Term</a>, FBI Ever Be Trusted Again?</b><br />
<br />
MAYBE ... never ...<br />
<br />
... include the whole of the Department Of Justice (DOJ) now that they just issued their Inspector General (IG) Report and it followed the exact template that then FBI Director presented nearly 2 years ago when he, Comey, went through the laundry list of law-breaking by Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) then ending with the conclusion that NO PROSECUTOR would take HRC to trial.<br />
<br />
The DOJ IG Report went through nearly 500 pages of descriptions of Political BIAS, over-reaches in power, deviance of FBI procedure, and unequal justice - then ending with the concluding ruling that NO Provable Political BIAS existed in the illegal HRC private email server investigation.<br />
<br />
These people distort process in order to pursue their collective progressive political ego and personality. Ego and emotion rules the day as these bureaucracies pile Bias upon Bias in order to undo the fair election of a 45th President that is anybody but Hillary Rodham Clinton.<br />
<br />
The FBI was rigging an election for President of the United States on behalf of one political party over the other.<br />
<br />
We, at Carter's Second Term, see Bias upon Bias along with Fix upon Fix "being placed in" to insure a Clinton Presidency using a two-tiered justice system where anybody but Hillary Clinton would be arrested for the countless felonies in the mishandling of classified information on her illegal private email server.<br />
<br />
If the FBI will ever be trusted again, the rank and file will have to step forward and become the face of - first, justice - then proper process over ideology and ego. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS: </b><i>DEEP STATE, James Clapper, John Brennan, Barack Obama, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, #BIAS, #corruption,#ego, #BHO44, MAXINE</i></span>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-12825431064796086162017-01-27T09:25:00.000-08:002017-01-27T09:25:09.364-08:00Congressional Review Act Can Effectively End The Obama Carter's Second Term<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhLx1pBMbE3R5YNDR9J0SH8KqNBsdr7svL1NBknnTSAl8VZk112b0s9k3j2wj4PgKK1bqWInDykRGby-RvG8eZ08axuDM__JFQMaRQnGXAhfNpWqOxpoUj2JT_zDwCXc-SkNByCW37Om4/s1600/Trump-Signs-Exec-Orders-Getty-640x480.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhLx1pBMbE3R5YNDR9J0SH8KqNBsdr7svL1NBknnTSAl8VZk112b0s9k3j2wj4PgKK1bqWInDykRGby-RvG8eZ08axuDM__JFQMaRQnGXAhfNpWqOxpoUj2JT_zDwCXc-SkNByCW37Om4/s400/Trump-Signs-Exec-Orders-Getty-640x480.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>Newly inaugurated 45th President of the United States signs his first executive order in the Oval Office of the White House. Image Credit: Getty Images (2017) </i></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<b>Congressional Review Act Can Effectively End The Obama Carter's Second Term</b><br />
<b><br />
</b> The Congressional Review Act (CRA) is an oversight tool that Congress may use to repeal or prevent a regulation issued by a federal agency from taking effect. The CRA was included in the “Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996” and allows Congress to review, and to cancel by majority rule, new federal regulations issued by federal agencies.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiALA6jIl-uxIAqOHfqZ8EgK3z67BlvrO4UlfNwYWLBQqFhklE635drIkxM8myipbP64JIEO1_melMLwDU8QM7msBLO4UjaUw5xRuYK9YbT2RlmaMlnQCIooF6PcZJFoW0UxtMZsmYrqaM/s1600/TRUMP+-+Bitter+Clingers.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="283" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiALA6jIl-uxIAqOHfqZ8EgK3z67BlvrO4UlfNwYWLBQqFhklE635drIkxM8myipbP64JIEO1_melMLwDU8QM7msBLO4UjaUw5xRuYK9YbT2RlmaMlnQCIooF6PcZJFoW0UxtMZsmYrqaM/s400/TRUMP+-+Bitter+Clingers.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>The Bitter Clingers - Cartoon by Ben Garrison</i></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from Bloomberg Government -</b><br />
<br />
<b><i>How to use the Congressional Review Act to undo regulatory actions</i></b><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>Arnold &amp; Porter Kaye Scholer LLP - Kevin O'Neill, Dana Weekes, Sara Garofalo Linder &amp; Roxana Boyd - January 26, 2017</i></span><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>With a Republican sweep of Congress and the executive branch, there will be a concerted effort this year to reform and restrain the current regulatory state. The Trump Administration and Republican Congress have a number of options to repeal regulations issued by the Obama Administration, with the Congressional Review Act (CRA) being one vehicle for affirmatively undoing some of the regulatory actions of the last six months.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>The CRA is an oversight tool that Congress may use to repeal or prevent a regulation issued by a federal agency from taking effect. The 1996 law grants Congress: (1) proper notification of new agency regulations; and (2) the authority to use a joint resolution of disapproval to overturn a rule that may not meet the congressional intent. Under the CRA, a joint resolution of disapproval can only repeal an interim final rule or final rule in its entirety, as it does not necessarily apply to draft regulations, and Congress cannot use it to reform parts of a rule.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Congress has only successfully overturned one rule under the CRA since its enactment in 1996, the final rule on ergonomics standards issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under the Clinton Administration.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>5 things you need to know about the CRA: </i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>1. As Congress has only repealed a rule under the CRA once before, more than 15 years ago, there are many unknown questions, including procedural questions and how a federal agency can engage on the issue following a repeal of the rule.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>2. For rules issued by the Obama Administration on or after January 3, 2017, Congress has 60 legislative days from when the agency publishes each rule in the Federal Register or when Congress receives the rule report, whichever date is later, to use the CRA to repeal the regulation.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>3. For a rule issued by the Obama Administration from June 13, 2016 (the parliamentarian in each chamber will set the actual date) through January 2, 2017, Congress has 60 legislative days starting from January 31 in the House and January 24 in the Senate to use the CRA to repeal the regulation.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>4. Any use of the CRA cannot be filibustered in the Senate, which disadvantages those Democrats looking to challenge Republican efforts to restrain the current regulatory state.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>5. Repealing a rule under the CRA likely foreclosures opportunities for a federal agency to reengage on the matter through a rulemaking for at least the next four years.</i><br />
[<a href="https://about.bgov.com/blog/restraining-current-regulatory-state-congressional-review-act/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
Interestingly, during President Obama's first two years in office, Congress did not use the CRA to repeal any Bush Administration final rules, despite the Democratic control of Congress.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLU3byNL6LgWNtUnqxBr7laKuOVhck7ZCknbfM-ypSn6oTJZ8-pETE4Xp6xyauLG3hmYNETCxENXDZzBX-YPNutcSvRqyFI7rUcNG4zBnQYZLkB4lFtJIOoVtM7qAHATTrCWKdavOz4A8/s1600/Trump+%2528Ryan+and+McConnell%2529+gives+his+inaugural+address+after+being+sworn+in+as+the+45th+president+of+the+United+States+-+Getty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="216" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLU3byNL6LgWNtUnqxBr7laKuOVhck7ZCknbfM-ypSn6oTJZ8-pETE4Xp6xyauLG3hmYNETCxENXDZzBX-YPNutcSvRqyFI7rUcNG4zBnQYZLkB4lFtJIOoVtM7qAHATTrCWKdavOz4A8/s400/Trump+%2528Ryan+and+McConnell%2529+gives+his+inaugural+address+after+being+sworn+in+as+the+45th+president+of+the+United+States+-+Getty.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>President Donald J. Trump give his inauguration address with House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell looking on. Image Credit Getty Images (2017)</i></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from Washington Examiner -</b><br />
<br />
<b><i>Obscure rule about to take center stage in regulation rollbacks</i></b><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>By SUSAN FERRECHIO (@SUSANFERRECHIO) - 1/23/17 12:01 AM</i></span><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Republicans this month will invoke the rarely used Congressional Review Act to extinguish some of the Obama administration's more recent regulations they believe will damage the economy.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>The GOP controls the majorities in both chambers and President Trump is eager to sign the legislation undoing the regulations, which affect the environment, education and jobs.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>"There is only a rare set of circumstances in which you can use it," Rutgers University professor Stuart Shapiro, a public policy expert, told the Washington Examiner.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Republicans have for years talked of undoing Obama administration regulations through legislation, but the CRA gives them an easier route in the Senate by allowing Republicans to avert the 60-vote filibuster. The CRA can be applied only to regulations issued within 60 legislative days.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>"We are going to do that very quickly," House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said of using the CRA during a recent interview on the Hugh Hewitt show.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>House Republicans announced that beginning on Jan. 30, they will move to reverse four recently announced regulations using the CRA and will target other regulations in the weeks ahead.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>At the top of the GOP's list is the Stream Protection Rule announced by the Obama administration in December. The rule is aimed at curbing environmental damage from coal mines. It boosts requirements for mining companies to monitor streams and more strictly defines "material damage" to waterways located beyond the mining footprint.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Critics, including Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said the rule constitutes regulatory overreach and will hurt the coal industry.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>"This costly regulation, along with others that are already having a devastating impact, are part of the administration's plan to demolish these coal communities right now and long after the president has left office," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>The House will also take on long-unpopular federal interference in education with a vote to eradicate a bevy of new federal rules that GOP lawmakers believe interfere and in some cases bypass the recently passed bipartisan law overhauling the unpopular No Child Left Behind Act.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Finally, the House will vote under the CRA to undo the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council's final rule, which critics call the "blacklisting order." The rule was finalized in August and establishes a long list of new record-keeping, reporting and compliance requirements that could be used to bar contractors from winning federal contracts. The rule was temporarily blocked in a Texas federal court.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>"You're going to see in February, the first two weeks, a lot of those regulations that were in the last 60 legislative days start moving to be repealed," Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said on the Hugh Hewitt show. "Because people don't quite realize, since the November election to Jan. 5, this administration, Obama's, has authored 145 new regulations, they've enacted more than $16 billion on us just since the election."</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obscure-rule-about-to-take-center-stage-in-regulation-rollbacks/article/2612351" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1fgD3vT_dbFov8Iwij9rtvGvAz442I4zkTys891M3BEjUHQpJu0OLdAeyPf7gU8R2nC7AN1hfwB1GXv1anTz5ZU2YRWu4j-g18bhi3HFikjRWA_Md9cFb6kRVtCayyV0g9ey-Y4Wkafc/s1600/Trump-Hillary-YOU-C+-+1024px.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1fgD3vT_dbFov8Iwij9rtvGvAz442I4zkTys891M3BEjUHQpJu0OLdAeyPf7gU8R2nC7AN1hfwB1GXv1anTz5ZU2YRWu4j-g18bhi3HFikjRWA_Md9cFb6kRVtCayyV0g9ey-Y4Wkafc/s400/Trump-Hillary-YOU-C+-+1024px.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>Then candidate Donald Trump in an info-graphic from Facebook posting in 2016 before the November 8th election.</i></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from Powerline -</b><br />
<br />
<b><i>REVIEW THIS</i></b><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>POSTED ON JANUARY 27, 2017 BY SCOTT JOHNSON</i></span><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Kim Strassel delivers today’s good news in her Wall Street Journal column “A GOP regulatory game changer” (accessible here via Google). She introduces the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Todd Gaziano to explain the mechanics of the rarely used (and almost always unsuccessful) Congressional Review Act of 1996 to undo executive agency regulations. (The text of the Congressional Review Act is accessible here.)</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>As a staffer to Rep&gt; David McIntosh at the time, Gaziano was “intimately involved” in drafting the law. According to Strassel, “No one knows the law better.” Here’s the beauty part:</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>The accepted wisdom in Washington is that the CRA can be used only against new regulations, those finalized in the past 60 legislative days. That gets Republicans back to June, teeing up 180 rules or so for override. Included are biggies like the Interior Department’s “streams” rule, the Labor Department’s overtime-pay rule, and the Environmental Protection Agency’s methane rule.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>But what Mr. Gaziano told Republicans on Wednesday was that the CRA grants them far greater powers, including the extraordinary ability to overrule regulations even back to the start of the Obama administration. The CRA also would allow the GOP to dismantle these regulations quickly, and to ensure those rules can’t come back, even under a future Democratic president. No kidding.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>How does it work? Kim alludes here to 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A) &amp; § 802(b)(2)(A) &amp; (B). With a little help from Gaziano, she explicates the text:</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>It turns out that the first line of the CRA requires any federal agency promulgating a rule to submit a “report” on it to the House and Senate. The 60-day clock starts either when the rule is published or when Congress receives the report—whichever comes later.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>“There was always intended to be consequences if agencies didn’t deliver these reports,” Mr. Gaziano tells me. “And while some Obama agencies may have been better at sending reports, others, through incompetence or spite, likely didn’t.” Bottom line: There are rules for which there are no reports. And if the Trump administration were now to submit those reports—for rules implemented long ago—Congress would be free to vote the regulations down.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Let me pause here to ask Steve Hayward to tune in:</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>There’s more. It turns out the CRA has a[n] expansive definition of what counts as a “rule”—and it isn’t limited to those published in the Federal Register. The CRA also applies to “guidance” that agencies issue. Think the Obama administration’s controversial guidance on transgender bathrooms in schools or on Title IX and campus sexual assault. It is highly unlikely agencies submitted reports to lawmakers on these actions.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>“If they haven’t reported it to Congress, it can now be challenged,” says Paul Larkin, a senior legal research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. Mr. Larkin, also at Wednesday’s meeting, told me challenges could be leveled against any rule or guidance back to 1996, when the CRA was passed.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>The best part? Once Congress overrides a rule, agencies cannot reissue it in “substantially the same form” unless specifically authorized by future legislation. The CRA can keep bad regs and guidance off the books even in future Democratic administrations—a far safer approach than if the Mr. Trump simply rescinded them.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>It sounds too good to be true. Nevertheless, to quote Lyndon Johnson as he undertook the vast expansion of the edifice of the administrative state: “Let us begin.” Roll away the administrative stone!</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/01/review-this.php" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
Key point on what can actually be placed on the chopping block of the Congressional Review Act ... ANY RULE/REGULATION that has not been reported to Congress within the prescribed 60 days can be challenged in this procedure going back to when the CRA was put in place ... 1996!<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>TAGS:</b> <i>Hugh Hewitt, Congressional Review Act, CRA, 1996, House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, </i></span><i style="font-size: small;">Kim Strassel, Wall Street Journal, Powerline, Washington Examiner, The Fourth Way, Donald J. Trump, Carter's Second Term</i><br />
<br />... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-3866656660509697882016-11-22T07:46:00.000-08:002016-11-22T07:46:47.932-08:00Threats To Freedom Left By Carter's Second & Third Terms ... The 44th Presidency<div style="text-align: center;">
<div class="infogram-embed" data-id="107adcfc-6176-4d4a-b219-1629da03547b" data-title="Top 10 federal register page counts" data-type="interactive">
</div>
<script>!function(e,t,n,s){var i="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName(t),d=o[0],a=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(s)&&(s=a+s),window[i]&&window[i].initialized)window[i].process&&window[i].process();else if(!e.getElementById(n)){var r=e.createElement(t);r.async=1,r.id=n,r.src=s,d.parentNode.insertBefore(r,d)}}(document,"script","infogram-async","//e.infogr.am/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js");</script><br /></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-2343058170303459202016-11-21T21:33:00.003-08:002016-11-21T21:33:36.899-08:00How Many Days Until Donald J Trump Inauguration Of The 45th Presidency?<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="true" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="315" scrolling="no" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FSeanHannity%2Fvideos%2F10157866660490389%2F&show_text=0&width=560" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" width="560"></iframe><br /></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-20367035647842752062016-09-13T09:13:00.003-07:002016-09-13T09:13:31.296-07:00HRC At Clintonian Best In Post 9/11 Anderson Cooper Interview<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg61KVpiM34sUYDG3c8dZjFNMG4eQT_i-gnk4VaKFwrNLbosv-wmyR2EMKHAJUYWI_T8FE64a_oioMGIoALzeSOsUdUYSUZu5oVKtJnUTG_N1O-dKrT8K8u-WbsrwPegP7n4yEuEmWUAq0/s1600/Capture+-+Anderson+Cooper+-+Twitter.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="352" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg61KVpiM34sUYDG3c8dZjFNMG4eQT_i-gnk4VaKFwrNLbosv-wmyR2EMKHAJUYWI_T8FE64a_oioMGIoALzeSOsUdUYSUZu5oVKtJnUTG_N1O-dKrT8K8u-WbsrwPegP7n4yEuEmWUAq0/s400/Capture+-+Anderson+Cooper+-+Twitter.PNG" width="400" /></a></div>
<b><br /></b>
<b>HRC At Clintonian Best In Post 9/11 Anderson Cooper Interview</b><br />
<br />
It is this response in a phone interview to a question asked by Anderson Cooper about the occurrence:<br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from People Magazine -</b><br />
<br />
<i>When Cooper asked how many times she'd had experienced dizziness in the past five years, citing her concussion in 2012, she said it'd only happened a few times.</i><br />
<br />
<i>"I think really only twice, that I can recall,” she responded. "It is something that has occurred a few times over the course of my life, I'm aware of it and can usually avoid it."</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.people.com/article/hillary-clinton-calls-anderson-cooper" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/y03Sc0H3n8s" width="480"></iframe><br /></div>
<br />
Only Twice and the word Few do not match up grammatically ... further, how does one develop a protocol on addressing the condition when the malady had occurred "Only Twice?"<br />
<br />
Also, her husband Bill Clinton was right there in the Clintonian cabal of words explaining Hillary's condition:<br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from CBS News -</b><br />
<br />
<i>Asked if there was any chance her faintness on Sunday could be a sign of some more “serious” illness, Clinton said he did not believe that was the case.</i><br />
<br />
<i>“Well if it is, it’s a mystery to me and all of her doctors,” he said, “because frequently — well not frequently, rarely — but on more than one occasion, over the last many, many years, the same sort of thing happened to her when she got severely dehydrated.”</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bill-clinton-on-clinton-foundation-weve-been-as-transparent-as-we-can-be/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0" height="412" id="flashObj" width="486"><param name="movie" value="https://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=5121396599001&playerID=2836079420001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAABjSC6Q~,pGevSATpV8FxFm_SUvLDMVrb05MPBmIl&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="https://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=5121396599001&playerID=2836079420001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAABjSC6Q~,pGevSATpV8FxFm_SUvLDMVrb05MPBmIl&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>
</div>
<br />
This pull quote "because frequently — well not frequently, rarely — but on more than one occasion" definitely has Carter's Second Term to conclude that, when matched up with Hillary Clinton's word "Few" as opposed to "Only Twice", that Hillary has had many episodes (definitely more than "Really Only Twice") and that this medical condition is way more common and serious ... so hence the confusion and Clintonian Cover-Up!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/ingraham-diagnoses-hillary-addd/" target="_blank">Laura Ingraham</a> asks a medical expert on her morning program Tuesday 9/13/2016 (paraphrased) - "Why would a personal doctor need to be nearby at an appearance recognizing the 15 year 9/11 attacks at the World Trade Center buildings in New York if this is a condition that had been stated as being Pneumonia?" - the medical expert suspected that given the known history of incidents (fainting, coughing, losing balance while walking, forgetfulness) that this suggests something much more serious.<br />
<br />... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-22233399012081924332015-01-09T10:48:00.000-08:002015-01-09T10:48:02.522-08:00Caliphate vs Caliphate - What The Charlie Hebdo Massacre Exposes<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiPJRi6ZP1etU-we1GdAadYcNW89JEVj30xwSW3DjjBXkSOh1XtZscdPULQ027ogNBXQaX50BP_jET4NG9ACe_A_vekBfIgMnFxBdUBDSKOVmJ0nTOIEwUq9uTq8doAWcfRQmAxbpt1fqP_/s1600/Charlie+Hebdo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiPJRi6ZP1etU-we1GdAadYcNW89JEVj30xwSW3DjjBXkSOh1XtZscdPULQ027ogNBXQaX50BP_jET4NG9ACe_A_vekBfIgMnFxBdUBDSKOVmJ0nTOIEwUq9uTq8doAWcfRQmAxbpt1fqP_/s1600/Charlie+Hebdo.jpg" height="192" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>Spanish cartoonists are sharing this image with the message: "To arms, companions!" via <a href="https://twitter.com/sicevis" target="_blank">@sicevis</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23CharlieHebdo" target="_blank">#CharlieHebdo</a> <a href="http://t.co/RZTitxGTZp" target="_blank">pic.twitter.com/RZTitxGTZp</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23tcot" target="_blank">#tcot</a></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<b>Caliphate vs Caliphate - What The Charlie Hebdo Massacre Exposes</b><br />
<br />
The world is run by ideas and the people/forces that back them. Throughout time, the human effort of governance has always been held by ideas backed through force.<br />
<br />
Most of the noise that consumes the information airways since 12 people who were involved with producing the cartoon based opinion publication "Charlie Hebdo" in Paris, France were murdered in an effort to silence their opinion that religion, any religion, and religious ideas that govern human behavior and social roles are not serious and a source for humor. <br />
<br />
The Muslim religion, and its enforcers (informed through Sharia Law) are busy at the business of shutting down all parts of organized humanity, that do not agree with their view on how humanity should be governed, in order to set up their own structure of governance that is not based in geographically defined countries - a Muslim Caliphate.<br />
<br />
Their most recent target in the Western world was aimed at one of the human freedoms modern society agrees is most important ... the freedom of speech.<br />
<br />
Once one peels back the layers of commentary, however, this freedom is not as important to many of those this attack was aimed at, which is the current political leadership force that has formed over putting forward a non-religion/secular based human governance and control over activity - a Progressive Caliphate.<br />
<br />
On this side of the struggle, Progressives are choosing not to look at these terrorist murderous acts in France as a war against their governance but more as a small outlier of activity performed by, as one news/opinion broadcaster (<a href="http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2015/01/07/charlie-hebdo-a-symbol-of-free-speech/">Christiane Amanpour</a>) put it, "activists."<br />
<br />
Many secular reporters are suggesting that if only Charlie Hebdo placed curbs on its freedom of expressing its secular opinion, these bloody murderous acts of killing 12 people, because the image Muhammad (the leader, through his teachings, of the Muslim religion) was defamed through published cartooning, would not have taken place. <br />
<br />
Due to the lack of seriousness of religion and its effects on the formation of culture and governance, the Progressives who govern France have allowed a flood of immigration without an insistence on integration to the existing culture. What France now sees are a series of over 750 "NO GO ZONES" where the people who choose to live in these zones are governed through the Muslim based Sharia Law. If a fire, or murder, or other acts of potential criminal and/or damaging human activity to other humans happens, French first responders are never dispatched and control in these areas is abdicated to the current Muslim Caliphate that resides there.<br />
<br />
This type of Muslim governance takeover is not just happening in France. The rest of Europe is at risk with this same set up of takeover through population concentration through immigration and non-insistence of cultural integration. A clash of civilizations.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7187/2273/1600/Wpdms_mexican_cession.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7187/2273/400/Wpdms_mexican_cession.jpg" height="352" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center;" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><span style="font-size: 78%;">AZTLAN Movement targeted at reclaiming control over the Western United States. The </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Cession" title="Mexican Cession"><span style="font-size: 78%;">Mexican Cession</span></a><span style="font-size: 78%;"> (</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1848" title="1848"><span style="font-size: 78%;">1848</span></a><span style="font-size: 78%;">) is shown in red with the </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsden_Purchase" title="Gadsden Purchase"><span style="font-size: 78%;">Gadsden Purchase</span></a><span style="font-size: 78%;"> (</span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1853" title="1853"><span style="font-size: 78%;">1853</span></a><span style="font-size: 78%;">) in orange. </span><span style="font-size: 78%;">© 2004 </span><a class="external text" href="http://www.decumanus.com/" title="http://www.decumanus.com/"><span style="font-size: 78%;">Matthew Trump</span></a><span style="font-size: 78%;">.</span></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<i><span style="font-size: 78%;"></span></i><br />
Europe is not the only group of countries at risk because the Progressive political leadership structures in Canada and <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2006/04/reconquer-it-doesnt-surprise-mayor.html" target="_blank">United States are open to these same tactics</a>. Open borders policies aided by government welfare, health benefits, and legal driver's licenses to <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2008/04/abolish-absolut-from-this-world.html" target="_blank">non-documented/illegal aliens</a> are nothing new to our combined Progressive political landscapes.<br />
<br />
Here in the progressive atmosphere that is Carter's Second Term, it's Caliphate vs Caliphate - Progressives vs Muslims - in an effort to establish a "New World Order", and what had been created in the establishment of a Constitution of governance (here in the United States) that was based in the idea that all Human rights, which also includes the Freedom Of Speech, are not granted to man from man (not a Monarch, a Prophet, or a Progressive government) ... but through God (a power greater than man), is in peril.<br />
<br />... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-15979412666787149812014-07-25T10:45:00.000-07:002014-07-25T11:31:59.210-07:00President Barack Obama's human trafficking efforts become FedEx-ing<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnVJn3KZpSmAHEBAcwl-XTY5JI0zjqn-HDs2XCgY4H2xjWsiBw0biVph-ueneiiHQKEg6qMZOPBEcrzwgDNjtF5HPFtzLjIIjXN01kFu8R68XRhB7FFjIWIRyjsGanjx7SYN0nzWn6gxQ/s1600/Capture+-+NYT+Graphic.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnVJn3KZpSmAHEBAcwl-XTY5JI0zjqn-HDs2XCgY4H2xjWsiBw0biVph-ueneiiHQKEg6qMZOPBEcrzwgDNjtF5HPFtzLjIIjXN01kFu8R68XRhB7FFjIWIRyjsGanjx7SYN0nzWn6gxQ/s1600/Capture+-+NYT+Graphic.PNG" height="242" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The number of children crossing the U.S. border alone has doubled since last year. More than three-quarters of unaccompanied minors are from mostly poor and violent towns in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/15/us/questions-about-the-border-kids.html" target="_blank">three countries: El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras</a>. Children from Mexico, once the largest group, now make up less than a quarter of the total. Graphic Credit: New York Times</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<b>President Barack Obama's Human Trafficking Efforts Become FedEx-ing</b><br />
<br />
Immigration of human beings into the United States use to be a semi-orderly process. <br />
<br />
A high level of respect for our borders and political culture governed by the Rule-Of-Law by other humans not born in this country was an assumed standard. Further, laws were passed by Congress to address special situations where labor needs, education access, and political upheaval could be addressed with the assumption always being that our citizens elected to office would perform their Oath Of Office and enforce the laws to the best of their ability.<br />
<br />
Over the last decade, this respect and political culture governed by the Rule-Of-Law has degraded to the point where our Executive Branch no longer enforces the existing laws on immigration but have sought to foment a form of (through assumption and formal agreement) multiple government human trafficking. Mexico, in response to <a href="http://time.com/3028637/obama-eyes-major-immigration-move/" target="_blank">President Obama's 2012 Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals - DACA (Dream Act) proclamation of executive fiat</a>, has opened up and fast-tracked the approval of Visa's allowing ANYBODY 72 hours to pass from their southern border to the southern border of the United States. Further, Mexico has been working directly with <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/5-immigration-issues-central-american-leaders-will-raise-with-obama/" target="_blank">"feeder governments" (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, etc.)</a> on agreements that would aid in a seamless streamlining of the Visa process to allow more people to leave their countries and pass through North to the United States.<br />
<br />
For the Executive Branch's part in this, the President has instructed all main border patrol management locations be moved back from the border by about 40 miles, and have them pick-up people they determine to be undocumented and perform a form of "catch and release" by having those processed sign a promise to appear for a case hearing on their immigration status. Some of these people that are processed are even given transportation to a destination of their choice within the United States, at taxpayer expense, where these people disappear into the country and never show up for their hearing of determination on their immigration status.<br />
<br />
This expansion into not respecting our borders and political culture governed by the Rule-Of-Law has now been taken up by the Executive Branch of the United States backed by many in both houses of Congress. Lawlessness on immigration policy and established law is beginning to rule the day. <br />
<br />
Rule by Executive proclamation and Congressional inactivity is becoming our de facto process for a path to citizenship for people who just happen to show up and set up shop in our country. <br />
<br />
It is as if someone on the street found out where you live, finds and unlocked sliding door, and just make themselves residents in your living room ... eat out of your kitchen from a refrigerator you stock, bathe in the bathrooms that you clean and tend, take away your job for less pay, and expect you to keep the roof over their head.<br />
<br />
President Barack Obama's human trafficking efforts through proposed Executive proclamation have, as defined, become a process of setting a formal in-country processing center for FedEx-ing non-citizens into the United States.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFcxWxgCQuOpiaqYty3jHHBqjpM1w4owizh-cwJNbXNGPTw7ifV6EiuBpvBE1u67mVbSl7sLOpAhOIOzWeiAmkzD5lPDtY76mw_iffjiYxEBjkvX2fL4Pz82UQI_yTK3RypDMy8I9mDxo/s1600/immigrationfoxnews1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFcxWxgCQuOpiaqYty3jHHBqjpM1w4owizh-cwJNbXNGPTw7ifV6EiuBpvBE1u67mVbSl7sLOpAhOIOzWeiAmkzD5lPDtY76mw_iffjiYxEBjkvX2fL4Pz82UQI_yTK3RypDMy8I9mDxo/s1600/immigrationfoxnews1.jpg" height="206" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">President Obama will sit down Friday with the presidents of Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala - the three countries that have been the greatest source of children illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. Image Credit: FOX News via mediamatters.org</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from the New York Times - </b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>U.S. Considering Refugee Status for Hondurans</b></i></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>By FRANCES ROBLES and MICHAEL D. SHEAR - NYT - JULY 24, 2014</i></span><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Hoping to stem the recent surge of migrants at the Southwest border, the Obama administration is considering whether to allow hundreds of minors and young adults from Honduras into the United States without making the dangerous trek through Mexico, according to a draft of the proposal.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>If approved, the plan would direct the government to screen thousands of children and youths in Honduras to see if they can enter the United States as refugees or on emergency humanitarian grounds. It would be the first American refugee effort in a nation reachable by land to the United States, the White House said, putting the violence in Honduras on the level of humanitarian emergencies in Haiti and Vietnam, where such programs have been conducted in the past amid war and major crises.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>By moving decisions on refugee claims to Honduras, the plan aims to slow the rush of minors crossing into the United States illegally from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, which has overwhelmed the border this year. More than 45,000 unaccompanied minors from those three nations have arrived since Oct. 1, straining federal resources to the point that some agencies will exhaust their budgets by next month, the secretary of Homeland Security has said.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>Administration officials stressed that no decision had been made to move forward, saying the idea was one of many being discussed by officials at the White House and the Departments of State, Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>The proposal, prepared by several federal agencies, says the pilot program under consideration would cost up to $47 million over two years, assuming 5,000 applied and about 1,750 people were accepted. If successful, it would be adopted in Guatemala and El Salvador as well. It is unclear how the administration determined those estimates, given that since Oct. 1 more than 16,500 unaccompanied children traveled to the United States from Honduras alone.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Children would be interviewed by American immigration employees trained to deal with minors, and a resettlement center would be set up in the Honduran capital, Tegucigalpa, with assistance from international organizations like the International Organization for Migration.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>The plan would be similar to a recent bill introduced by Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona, who proposed increasing the number of refugee visas to the three Central American countries by 5,000 each.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports tighter controls on immigration, said that the proposal would increase, not stem, the flood of migrants from Central America trying to get into the United States.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>“It’s clearly a bad idea,” Mr. Krikorian said. “Orders of magnitude more people will apply for refugee status if they can just do it from their home countries.”</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>He added that the proposal would allow people to claim to be refugees from their countries with “nothing more than a bus ride to the consulate. We’re talking about, down the road, an enormous additional flow of people from those countries.”</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>Under American law, refugees are people fleeing their country of origin based on fears of persecution by reason of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>The only category that would seem to apply is “social group,” experts said, but there is disagreement on what that means. Some contend that children could count as a group, but others say the refugee requirements are stricter, and would not apply to people fleeing general crime and violence.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>“What is a social group?” said Muzaffar Chishti, director of migration policies for the Migration Policy Institute’s New York office. “This is going to create a huge deal of debate. You will see a lot of law developing on it.”</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>When a similar plan was adopted in Haiti, as a way to keep people from taking to the high seas, he said, it was ultimately criticized because Haitians already in the United States did not receive help. “It ended up being counterproductive to the goal,” Mr. Appleby said.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>Stacie Blake, the director of government relations for the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, an advocacy group, said the processing of potential refugees in Central America could be handled by the United States or by the United Nations, which makes refugee determinations in many other countries. She said some of the people designated as refugees in Honduras could end up in countries other than the United States.</i><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>“It’s a way to help folks avoid life-threatening escapes and journeys,” Ms. Blake said. “It’s a good idea. It’s a tested idea.”</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>On Friday, Mr. Obama is scheduled to meet with the presidents of Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador at the White House in an effort to urge the Central American leaders to do more to help stem the flow of children fleeing their countries for the United States.</i><br />
<i>----</i><br />
<i>Critics of the plan were quick to pounce, saying it appeared to redefine the legal definition of a refugee and would only increase the flow of migration to the United States. Administration officials said they believed the plan could be enacted through executive action, without congressional approval, as long as it did not increase the total number of refugees coming into the country.</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/25/world/americas/administration-weighs-plan-to-move-processing-of-youths-seeking-entry-to-honduras-.html?_r=0" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
So the agencies of this United States government, under this re-definition of refugee status, will be setting up shops in the form of refugee processing centers in targeted countries on which refugees are deemed, then shipped (presumably by plane) into the United States - Welcome to the age of "FedEx-ing" our immigration system through Executive Branch proclamation.<br />
<br />
Do not be surprised to hear, before this 44th President leaves office - ending Carter's Second Term, that President Barack Obama P-A-R-D-O-N-S all people breaking the law by being here in the United States illegally ... and grants them full citizenship through Executive Order. <br /><br />... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-56867584245688278262014-01-30T08:16:00.002-08:002014-01-30T16:21:19.046-08:00Just Who ... Is President Barack Obama<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-yXoX7UUAbKp2I62hyyAiDbo7ISwkEd3XX7Ws_5OUA6BcDMfN8ffiHLRE9pXA_2Ain6Azz-xaw3OuxDOUsJbptmJj5SeuNQ0kVwhg4E2rxV4cKtKK0oElwSdMR9qnsaMt2jHncIhdP_4/s1600/President+Barack+Obama+(L)+will+meet+with+Jordan%E2%80%99s+King+Abdullah+II+in+Palm+Springs+next+month.+(Photo+credit+-+MANDEL+NGAN-AFP-Getty+Images).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-yXoX7UUAbKp2I62hyyAiDbo7ISwkEd3XX7Ws_5OUA6BcDMfN8ffiHLRE9pXA_2Ain6Azz-xaw3OuxDOUsJbptmJj5SeuNQ0kVwhg4E2rxV4cKtKK0oElwSdMR9qnsaMt2jHncIhdP_4/s400/President+Barack+Obama+(L)+will+meet+with+Jordan%E2%80%99s+King+Abdullah+II+in+Palm+Springs+next+month.+(Photo+credit+-+MANDEL+NGAN-AFP-Getty+Images).jpg" height="225" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>President Barack Obama (L) will meet with Jordan’s King Abdullah II in Palm Springs next month. Image Credit: MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images</i></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<b>Just Who ... Is President Barack Obama</b><br />
<br />
President Barack Obama will host King Abdullah II of Jordan for talks in Southern California next month, according to reports.<br />
<br />
The White House says the Feb. 14 meeting will take place at the Sunnylands estate near Palm Springs, the Associated Press reported.<br />
<br />
Fresh off of performing in front of Congress and the nation by delivering his fourth State of the Union address reporting on his deeds, the 44th President still insists that he is the person who has the ideas to bring our country back to the great power it once was. This position comes as Barack Obama enters his sixth year of implementing policies that expand government into the lives of all citizens which has created the worst United States economy since the Great Depression.<br />
<br />
Just who is President Barack Obama?<br />
<br />
The following Audio/Video is an interview and exploration of this very question by Mark Levin of <span class="st">Dr. Paul Kengor, professor of political science at Grove City College and </span>author of the book, "The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor."<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/nU9QSNoq_qY" width="480"></iframe><br />
</div><i><span style="font-size: x-small;">(ht: Daily Rushbo)</span></i><br />
<br />
For decades, many liberals and progressives defended and shielded communists (as “The Communist” shows)—either because they approved of what communist dictatorships did, or because they believed so strongly in communism’s professed ideals that they were willing to overlook the crimes committed in its name. Kengor’s book is timely, because the main issue for today’s progressives is similar: Are the ideals professed in Barack Obama’s rhetoric noble ... even though his policies against economic success have retarded economic recovery? <br />
<br />
Will the ghost of Frank Marshall Davis, whose life Paul Kengor has so masterfully reconstructed in “The Communist,” continue to haunt America through his ideological godson, the president?<br />
<br />
Mark Levin is the perfect person to interview Dr. Paul Kengor, author of, "The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor" to find out just who ... is fulfilling Carter's Second Term through its second stint.... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-40211270120420620492013-09-05T09:38:00.000-07:002013-09-05T10:37:52.941-07:00The 44th President's 2002 Speech On Waging War, With Syria Update<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIFvyU1F35IlXih9Q8qzYHgRgmq5or4TupJYYOq53KrnK-lV7uM4iPe5Y3re1j2uuxLnx2KnAk9ALXQ8KiX-Fj3NLU8OuZnIoKWjbUbMP6aZqMofnSSyzXtPJfazKZeQRL2Nr_Dxt_Qh4/s1600/OB-YU063_obama2_G_20130904165453+-+Associated+Press.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="267" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIFvyU1F35IlXih9Q8qzYHgRgmq5or4TupJYYOq53KrnK-lV7uM4iPe5Y3re1j2uuxLnx2KnAk9ALXQ8KiX-Fj3NLU8OuZnIoKWjbUbMP6aZqMofnSSyzXtPJfazKZeQRL2Nr_Dxt_Qh4/s400/OB-YU063_obama2_G_20130904165453+-+Associated+Press.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">President <a href="http://topics.wsj.com/person/O/barack,-obama/4328">Barack Obama</a> gestures while speaking in the White House briefing room in Washington, Monday, Aug. 20, 2012. Image Credit: AP via Washington Wire</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<b>The 44th President's 2002 Speech On Waging War, With Syria Update</b><br />
<br />
<i>The following is a transcript of the remarks then-Sen. Barack Obama delivered in Chicago on Oct. 2, 2002. In his speech, Obama said that what he was opposed to was "a dumb war ... a rash war." He said the war was a "cynical attempt" to shove "ideological agendas down our throats" and would distract from domestic problems such as poverty and health care. </i><br />
<br />
<i>This version has been UPDATED with <strike>strike throughs</strike> / updated inserts to reflect our current historical perspective now nearly eleven (11) years later.</i><br />
<i> </i> <br />
Good afternoon. Let me begin by saying that although this has been billed as an anti-war rally, I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances. The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union, and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil. I don't oppose all wars.<br />
<br />
My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton's army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain. I don't oppose all wars.<br />
<br />
After Sept. 11, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this administration's pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such tragedy from happening again. I don't oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism.<br />
<br />
What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by <strike>Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz</strike> / Samantha Power and Susan Rice and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.<br />
<br />
What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like <strike>Karl Rove</strike> / David Axelrod to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about <strike>Saddam Hussein</strike> / Bashar Assad. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.<br />
<br />
But I also know that <strike>Saddam</strike> / Bashar poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.<br />
<br />
So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, <strike>President Bush</strike> / 44th Presidency? Let's finish the fight with <strike>bin Laden and</strike> al-Qaida, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings. You want a fight, <strike> President Bush</strike> / 44th Presidency?<br />
<br />
Let's fight to make sure that the U.N. inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe. You want a fight, <strike>President Bush</strike> / 44th Presidency?<br />
<br />
Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells. You want a fight, <strike>President Bush</strike> / 44th Presidency? Let's fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn't simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.<br />
<br />
Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair. The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not — we will not — travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.<br />
(ht: <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99591469" target="_blank">npr.org</a>) <br />
ENDS <br />
<br />
Welcome to the world firmly rooted in the policies initiated during the 39th Presidency with the added element of gross hypocrisy and child-king megalomaniac-like assertions.<br />
<br />
<b>EXAMPLE:</b><br />
<br />
Yesterday, The 44th President, Barack Obama, said the following during a press conference held while he visited with Sweden’s prime minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt.<br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from the New York Times - </b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Obama Says ‘World Set a Red Line’ on Chemical Arms</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><i>By PETER BAKER - September 4, 2013 </i></span><br />
<i><br />
</i> <i>“<b><span style="font-size: large;">I didn’t</span> set a red line</b>,” Mr. Obama said during a news conference here in Stockholm. “The world set a red line.”<br />
<br />
He added, “<b><span style="font-size: large;">My credibility</span>’s not on the line</b>. The international community’s credibility is on the line. And America and Congress’s credibility is on the line.” </i><br />
[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/world/europe/obama-arrives-in-sweden-before-g-20-summit.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
But this does not comport with the facts of statements The 44th President made a little over one year ago when he said:<br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from The Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire - </b><br />
<br />
<i><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Flashback: ‘Red Line’ in Syria — What Obama Said in 2012 Remarks</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">Washington Wire - September 4, 2013</span><br />
<br />
Q (Chuck Todd, NBC News) Mr. President, could you update us on your latest thinking of where you think things are in Syria, and in particular, whether you envision using U.S. military, if simply for nothing else, the safe keeping of the chemical weapons, and if you’re confident that the chemical weapons are safe? <br />
<br />
I also want to follow up on an answer you just gave to Nancy. You said that one of the reasons you wanted to see Mitt Romney‘s tax returns was you want to see if everybody is playing by the same set of rules. That actually goes to the question she asked, which is this implication, do you think there’s something Mitt Romney is not telling us in his tax returns that indicates he’s not playing by the same set of rules?<br />
<br />
THE PRESIDENT: No. There’s a difference between playing by the same sets of rules and doing something illegal. And in no way have we suggested the latter. But the first disclosure, the one year of tax returns that he disclosed indicated that he used Swiss bank accounts, for example. Well, that may be perfectly legal, but I suspect if you ask the average American, do you have one and is that part of how you manage your tax obligations, they would say no. They would find that relevant information, particularly when we’re going into a time where we know we’re going to have to make tough choices both about spending and about taxes.<br />
<br />
So I think the idea that this is somehow exceptional, that there should be a rationale or a justification for doing more than the very bare minimum has it backwards. I mean, the assumption should be you do what previous presidential candidates did, dating back for decades. And Governor Romney’s own dad says, well, the reason I put out 10 or 12 years is because any single year might not tell you the whole story. And everybody has, I think, followed that custom ever since.<br />
<br />
The American people have assumed that if you want to be President of the United States, that your life is an open book when it comes to things like your finances. I’m not asking him to disclose every detail of his medical records — although we normally do that as well — (laughter.) You know? I mean, this isn’t sort of overly personal here, guys. This is pretty standard stuff. I don’t think we’re being mean by asking him to do what every other presidential candidate has done — right? It’s what the American people expect.<br />
<br />
On Syria, obviously this is a very tough issue. I have indicated repeatedly that President al-Assad has lost legitimacy, that he needs to step down. So far, he hasn’t gotten the message, and instead has double downed in violence on his own people. The international community has sent a clear message that rather than drag his country into civil war he should move in the direction of a political transition. But at this point, the likelihood of a soft landing seems pretty distant.<br />
<br />
What we’ve said is, number one, we want to make sure we’re providing humanitarian assistance, and we’ve done that to the tune of $82 million, I believe, so far. And we’ll probably end up doing a little more because we want to make sure that the hundreds of thousands of refugees that are fleeing the mayhem, that they don’t end up creating — or being in a terrible situation, or also destabilizing some of Syria’s neighbors.<br />
<br />
The second thing we’ve done is we said that we would provide, in consultation with the international community, some assistance to the opposition in thinking about how would a political transition take place, and what are the principles that should be upheld in terms of looking out for minority rights and human rights. And that consultation is taking place.<br />
<br />
I have, at this point, not ordered military engagement in the situation. But the point that you made about chemical and biological weapons is critical. That’s an issue that doesn’t just concern Syria; it concerns our close allies in the region, including Israel. It concerns us. We cannot have a situation where chemical or biological weapons are falling into the hands of the wrong people.<br />
<br />
We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, <b>that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change <span style="font-size: large;">my calculus</span>. That would change <span style="font-size: large;">my equation</span>.</b><br />
<br />
Q (Todd) So you’re confident it’s somehow under — it’s safe?<br />
<br />
THE PRESIDENT: In a situation this volatile, I wouldn’t say that I am absolutely confident. What I’m saying is we’re monitoring that situation very carefully. We have put together a range of contingency plans. <b>We have communicated in no uncertain terms with every player in the region that that’s a red line for us and that there would be enormous consequences if we start seeing movement on the chemical weapons front or the use of chemical weapons. That would change <span style="font-size: large;">my calculations</span> significantly.</b><br />
<br />
All right, thank you, everybody.</i><br />
[<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/09/04/flashback-red-line-in-syria-what-obama-said-in-2012-remarks/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
No statements were ever made linking action toward Syria and decades old accords that sit at the United Nations and no United States Congressional leader or World leader, other than this 44th President, ever evoked the term of RED LINE as it relates to actions concerning Syrian unrest.<br />
<br />
Welcome to <a href="http://carters2ndterm.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Carter's Second Term</a> ... but it is way more dangerous and corrupt than we expected. Oh, and the damage to the economy due to Government spending and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act/ObamaCare has yet to get underway in earnest. <br />
<br />
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington, D.C., DC 20500, USA38.897683099999988 -77.03649719999998538.894593599999986 -77.041539699999987 38.900772599999989 -77.031454699999983tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-27196347092969735592013-06-12T23:17:00.002-07:002013-06-13T05:05:40.382-07:00Of Citizenship, Law-Making, And Mass Data Collection/Storage<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-mJlR9GVACFlA2iCoWdB2dEqMmNVHWjMKMSBkyXlGUbKAPr-MsXYMjy5kAv7Ks4tBfL5U0zoo9vbTqBb0fBnNXBhlh5DkUwWzwXaDl_NewLwPz9sRPeQXpu8FhoqIA0UAl-85bKnuvjI/s1600/In+The+Shadows.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="371" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-mJlR9GVACFlA2iCoWdB2dEqMmNVHWjMKMSBkyXlGUbKAPr-MsXYMjy5kAv7Ks4tBfL5U0zoo9vbTqBb0fBnNXBhlh5DkUwWzwXaDl_NewLwPz9sRPeQXpu8FhoqIA0UAl-85bKnuvjI/s400/In+The+Shadows.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">Most preferred by data-mined citizens – “pathway to the shadows.” Image Credit: :R.e.a.s.o.n: via Flicker</span><br />
<br />
<b>Of Citizenship, Law-Making, And Mass Data Collection/Storage</b><br />
<br />
So much is going on with our Government and our culture during this extend version of Carter's Second Term - the 44th Presidency of the United States. <br />
<br />
The progressives (Democrats & <a data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_In_Name_Only" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_In_Name_Only" target="_blank">RINO</a>s) have everything so turned upside down that they think it is a good idea to bring people - who have decided, on their own, to live here in the United States without proper permission (illegal aliens) - "out of the shadows" by offering them a "pathway to citizenship" in a distorted process of law-making. <br />
<br />
At the same time, these very same progressives (Democrats & RINOs) think it is perfectly proper, in the name of protecting us citizens from world-wide terrorism, to dragnet and store all of our privately developed data from our phone calls, to banking transactions, to communications activity on the internet, thereby making all 330+ million of us citizens ... suspected terrorists.<br />
<br />
To all of this ... most actual/legal citizens of the United States would love to request from our progressively led Government, a "pathway to the shadows" so that we can get on with our freedom-loving lives - the sooner the better!<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">(ht: <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/06/12/if_the_nsa_can_track_anyone_anywhere_why_can_t_we_find_10_to_11_million_illegals_living_in_the_shadows" target="_blank">Rush Limbaugh</a>) </span><br />
<br />... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-8932451464661601822013-06-07T19:56:00.000-07:002013-06-07T19:56:41.330-07:00Democrat Political Party Leadership On Invasive Keystroke Surveillance
<div class="post-body">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://cdn.theatlanticwire.com/img/upload/2013/06/06/obama-prism/large.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="248" src="http://cdn.theatlanticwire.com/img/upload/2013/06/06/obama-prism/large.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">If you thought the <a class=" lingo_link" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8S26M1G0&show_article=1" rel="nofollow" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; color: orange; cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size: xx-small; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none;">National Security Agency's</a>
collection of Verizon phone-call data was bad, wait until you hear
about the seven-year-old, previously undisclosed classified government
program that works with nine very major U.S. Internet companies to
secretly scrape your online life and has become "the most prolific
contributor" to President Obama's daily intelligence report and is
"increasingly" important to the NSA. Caption Credit & Image Credit:
theatlanticwire.com</span><br />
<br />
<b>Democrat Political Party Leadership On Invasive Keystroke Surveillance</b><br />
<br />
At what point in time does having the ability to have a private life
cease to be viable in a Bill-Of-Rights, Rule-Of-Law, Constitutionally
protected society?<br />
<br />
The answer can be found when a Government becomes so big and fearful of
its citizens that it violates the trust between the institutions of
Government and the citizens these institutions were established to serve
on behalf of the citizens.<br />
<br />
Yesterday, a United Kingdom news service, The Daily Guardian, issued a
second in a series of information articles about the United States
Government’s information gathering programs run by the National Security
Agency and other government institutions under the mission of curbing
terrorism.<br />
<br />
The first information based article highlighted that Verizon was
turning over, wholesale, all phone call information it had on its
hundreds of millions calls per day, to the NSA for the Government to use
however it saw fit to use. The information included phone numbers,
time of call, location of both <a href="http://www.politisite.com/?p=57650&preview=true#" id="_GPLITA_0" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown">phones</a>
on the call, duration, an other key digital data that was associated
with the call in a practice that has been termed by some as a DRAGNET.<br />
<br />
The information in the second article in as many days from the UK’s
Guardian (where are the American news services on this exposure and
investigation of this information?) highlights that this Democrat
Political Party led Government was also collecting EVERY KEYSTROKE a
person types on the internet in order to communicate the who, what,
when, where, and why they are.<br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from The Guardian -</b>
<b><br />
</b><br />
<i><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>NSA snooping on massive amounts of personal data from major U.S. Internet companies</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">By Glenn Greenwald, The Guardian – Thursday, June 6, 2013</span></i><br />
<i><br />
</i>
<i>The participation of the </i><a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/06/nsa-snooping-on-massive-amounts-of-personal-data-from-major-u-s-internet-companies/#" id="_GPLITA_2" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown"><span style="color: navy;"><i>internet companies</i></span></a><i> in PRISM will add to the debate, ignited by the Verizon revelation, about the scale of surveillance by the <a class=" lingo_link" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8S26M1G0&show_article=1" rel="nofollow" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; color: orange; cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size: 11.7px; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none;">intelligence services.</a>
Unlike the collection of those call records, this surveillance can
include the content of communications and not just the metadata.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Some of the world’s largest internet brands are claimed to be part
of the information-sharing program since its introduction in 2007. </i><a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/06/nsa-snooping-on-massive-amounts-of-personal-data-from-major-u-s-internet-companies/#" id="_GPLITA_5" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown"><span style="color: navy;"><i>Microsoft</i></span></a><i>
– which is currently running an advertising campaign with the slogan
“Your privacy is our priority” – was the first, with collection
beginning in December 2007.</i><br />
<br />
<i>It was followed by Yahoo in 2008; Google, Facebook and </i><a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/06/nsa-snooping-on-massive-amounts-of-personal-data-from-major-u-s-internet-companies/#" id="_GPLITA_4" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown"><span style="color: navy;"><i>PalTalk</i></span></a><i>
in 2009; YouTube in 2010; Skype and AOL in 2011; and finally Apple,
which joined the program in 2012. The program is continuing to expand,
with other providers due to come <a href="http://www.politisite.com/?p=57650&preview=true#" id="_GPLITA_3" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown">online</a>.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Collectively, the companies cover the vast majority of online email, search, video and <a class=" lingo_link" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8PE68SO0&show_article=1" rel="nofollow" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted; color: orange; cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Sans-serif; font-size: 11.7px; font-style: italic; font-weight: 400; text-decoration: none;">communications networks.</a></i><br />
(<a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/06/nsa-snooping-on-massive-amounts-of-personal-data-from-major-u-s-internet-companies/" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>)<br />
<br />
<b><span class="userContent">T R U E C O L O R S !!</span></b><br />
<br />
The Bush Administration first found folks to be suspicious of … then asked for <a href="http://www.politisite.com/?p=57650&preview=true#" id="_GPLITA_4" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown">phone</a> record information about these individuals … and followed the trail.<br />
<br />
The Democrat Political Party led Obama Administration uses this post 9/11 law – the Patriot Act – to cast a n<span class="text_exposed_show">et on ALL individuals, assuming that ALL of us are potential terrorists. </span><br />
<br />
<span class="userContent"><span class="text_exposed_show">After using information to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/29/the-irs-scandal-is-about-targeting-not-scrutiny/" target="_blank">target Obama Administration questioners through the power of the Internal Revenue Service</a>
(IRS), does anyone believe that this broad net information would be
used for your personal good??? – THIS is why the United States HAS a
Constitution and a Bill-Of-Rights backed with a Rule-Of-Law.</span></span><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.politisite.com/?p=57650&preview=true#" id="_GPLITA_2" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="Click to Continue > by CouponDropDown">Senator Barack Obama</a>
ran for President saying that the Bush Administration practice was
un-American and that his government would do away with these snooping
practices – in practice, however, he lied to each and everyone of us and
is collecting information on each and everyone of us – WITHOUT DUE
CAUSE OR SUSPICION!<br />
<br />
President Barack Obama’s T R U E C O L O R S !!!<br />
<br />
<br />
<i><span style="font-size: xx-small;">**Article first published as <a href="http://technorati.com/politics/article/democrat-political-party-leadership-on-invasive/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Democrat Political Party Leadership on Invasive Keystroke Surveillance </a> on Technorati** </span></i></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington, DC 20500, USA38.897683099999988 -77.03649719999998538.894593599999986 -77.041539699999987 38.900772599999989 -77.031454699999983tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-87206840195244087172013-05-19T08:26:00.000-07:002013-05-19T08:26:27.811-07:00The IRS Scandal Is Improper And Illegal Political Competition<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiCzQcPW2hN8f62BJW1cfRyGLKjWBedyvejP2YT2gA0gIE4aw1pTT194d6F8_yBDwLnu6AqrVT9KtSP5y4cNwWPZ3TfZiZxhi3t1xOxGIUnP5Yb1WYaOBOeCHP8MtD6WVaV0iI0CXT7Vw/s1600/IRS+Scrutiny.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiCzQcPW2hN8f62BJW1cfRyGLKjWBedyvejP2YT2gA0gIE4aw1pTT194d6F8_yBDwLnu6AqrVT9KtSP5y4cNwWPZ3TfZiZxhi3t1xOxGIUnP5Yb1WYaOBOeCHP8MtD6WVaV0iI0CXT7Vw/s400/IRS+Scrutiny.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">Image Credit: WPSD-TV</span><br />
<br />
<b> The IRS Scandal Is Improper And Illegal Political Competition </b><br />
<br />
Democrats, who are famous for making a bunch of noise about Fairness, Equal Access, Voter Suppression, and Racial Discrimination ... "REDLINED" all requests by tax-exempt organizations that appeared to be aligned against a progressive political agenda.<br />
<br />
Many organizations were headed up by conservative Black, Hispanic, Female and Religious organizers, who wanted to educate potential voters and inform them of the consequences of tyranny (the kind they were being confronted with in their application process), and be able to bring fairness in the process of public discourse.<br />
<br />
This is by any measure, far worse than what had actually happened in the activities that created "Watergate" and what the activities were suppose to achieve - political competition and the garnering of information overcome by mission creep.<br />
<br />
In the case of Watergate, a small group of people who were supporting the re-election efforts of Richard M. Nixon, in order to get direct information from the Democrat Political Party, broke into the offices of the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C., on June 17, 1972, and the Nixon administration's attempted cover-up of its involvement in this effort.<br />
<br />
Many speculate that this scandal gave our nation the Carter Administration.<br />
<br />
What is now just coming to light is a culture of political competition and the garnering of personal information overcome by mission creep headed up by the management forces of the Executive Branch and key Democrat Senate and House of Representative leaders. The level of involvement in this culture marshals the immense power and legal consequence strength of most all of the human activity management forces of Government embodied in the processes of Bureaucracy (Internal Revenue Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, Health and Human Services, and etc.). We now have a Government that is not designed as "for the people and by the people" as the Constitution creates and instructs, but a Government aligned to protect Progressive political agendas and policies against those who believe in the Constitution of the United States, the Bill-Of-Rights, and the Rule-Of-Law.<br />
<br />
What we have today is a whole Government, with all of its information gathering and legal power, aligned to support re-election efforts of any Democrat Political Party candidate as opposed to a simple effort by a few people involved in political competition and the garnering of information overcome by mission creep.<br />
<br />
The IRS scandal is improper and illegal political competition and is far worse than what the the Republican Political Party subjected citizens to through the efforts put forth in Watergate (one political party's management office versus a cross-over into citizenry political thought and activity management) in the pursuit of power and political competition.<br />
<br />
Those funny Democrats!!<br />
<br />... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-84417991728956135882012-10-03T07:39:00.000-07:002012-10-03T07:39:32.446-07:00Reasons 91-100 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1320507707268959282" itemprop="description articleBody">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq_ODOyiKLSuojVqtAlp8KWoLXSx6hsHnj6UivpY9vUSs2NAFmHShqVJ-DoW5lmGLtwg-5FTMA7QmHb-r-kTjKvvKAH3BOjWxZznafRMyumIxMTGcKeFKvAH0wVpXm6Q0VZe3S6AX_7dc/s1600/Capture.JPG+-+R+vs+O+100+Reasons+Logo.JPG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq_ODOyiKLSuojVqtAlp8KWoLXSx6hsHnj6UivpY9vUSs2NAFmHShqVJ-DoW5lmGLtwg-5FTMA7QmHb-r-kTjKvvKAH3BOjWxZznafRMyumIxMTGcKeFKvAH0wVpXm6Q0VZe3S6AX_7dc/s400/Capture.JPG+-+R+vs+O+100+Reasons+Logo.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">It is time for a 45th <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency" rel="wikipedia" title="Presidency">Presidency</a> - To this end, <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com" href="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com/" rel="homepage" title="Hugh Hewitt">Hugh Hewitt</a> has come up with 100 reasons to vote for <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.mittromney.com" href="http://www.mittromney.com/" rel="homepage" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a> or against <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" rel="homepage" title="Barack Obama">Barack Obama</a> and these series of posts will highlight ten (or so) points to consider for your vote to have a 45th <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States" rel="wikipedia" title="President of the United States">President</a> elected come November 6, 2012. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks</span><br />
<br />
<b>Reasons 91-100 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012</b></div>
<br />
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Constitutional and environmental issues Lawyer/Professor, nationally syndicated afternoon issues talk show host, Hugh Hewitt delivered a tour de force presentation for three hours on the reasons why we need a change in executive leadership in the <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667&spn=10.0,10.0&q=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667%20(United%20States)&t=h" rel="geolocation" title="United States">United States</a>. This change can happen with our vote for president in the 2012 elections which early voting has already started in many states, but will officially take place November 6, 2012.<br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 91-100 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-91-100-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
This edition explores reasons 91-100 which highlight: The Obama Administration has increased the budgets of all of the departments of Government by 20% while our economy only grows under 2% with the policies that they have enacted. Barack Obama promised to cut government programs and in four years this Administration has not been able to find just one department out of existance. The EPA's expansion of new regulations on business, especially carbon-based energy has cost this country and increased the cost of energy by 100% since Obama took office. Unemployment has remained above 8% for ovsr 42 months straight ... thi in the face of nearly 2 Trillion dollars between the Stimulus and Omnibus spending bills that passed in 2009 with Obama's insistance that he needed to spend this money to cap unemployment at 6% or less. Mitt Romney has stated that he will slash the size of the Federal Government and address entitlement reform. The Government spends way too much due to its size against the taxes it brings in. It is a spending problem, not a taxation problem. Mitt Romney has committed to restoring our Naval strength by maintaining a fleet of 340 ships. Lastly, Mitt Romney will address the economic aggression and foul play of China.<br />
<br />
In a presentation which Hugh Hewitt titled 100 reasons why you should vote for Mitt Romney and against Barack Obama, Hugh proceeded point by point with full explanation and in no particular order 100 specific reasons Mitt Romney would make a better president to lead our country mixed in with the specific reasons why Barack Obama has not been a successful leader in the more than 1,000 days he has been president.<br />
<br />
Since a three hour presentation of dense information may be a little hard to chew on in one session, here is one of ten postings that breaks up the 100 reasons in approximately 10 reason apiece chunks that can be savored and digested upon which one can become fully informed before making a freedom and country <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2012/09/reasons-1-10-of-hewitts-100-reasons-to.html#" id="_GPLITA_0" title="Click to Continue > by Text-Enhance">saving</a> vote in this most important election.<br />
<br />
Previously Published <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_engineering" rel="wikipedia" title="Audio engineering">Audio</a> Links:<br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 1-10 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-1-10-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 11-20 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-11-20-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 21-30 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-21-30-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 31-40 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-31-40-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 41-50 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-41-50-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 51-61 of 100 - <b><a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-51-61-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank">LISTEN HERE</a></b>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 62-70 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-62-70-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 71-80 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-71-80-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 81-90 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-81-90-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from HughHewitt.com - </b><br />
<br />
<i><b>100 <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.reason.com/" rel="homepage" title="Reason (magazine)">Reason</a> To <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting" rel="wikipedia" title="Voting">Vote</a> For Mitt Romney Or Against Barack Obama</b><br />
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:12 PM</i><br />
<br />
<i>After yet another dispiriting Browns' performance yesterday, I decided to redeem the day by listing 100 reasons to either vote for Mitt Romney or against Barack Obama. I turned that list into a three hour monologue on today's show -- the first such in 12 years of radio.</i><br />
<br />
<i>It wasn't hard to do. Not hard at all. Which is why I think Romney will <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2012/09/reasons-1-10-of-hewitts-100-reasons-to.html#" id="_GPLITA_2" title="Click to Continue > by Text-Enhance">win</a> going away. The president is a failure, on every level and by every measurement. Americans don't endorse failure.</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com/blog/g/1f6da36a-b72f-4fa6-afd5-ee1d63c8697e" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
As the "Chicago Way" <a href="http://www.democrats.org/" rel="homepage" title="Democratic Party (United States)">Democrat</a> Political Party is fond of saying ... "Vote Early, and Vote Often" ... but most importantly, vote informed and reviewing all of Hewitt's 100 reasons to vote for Romney and against Obama 2012 may at least allow one to open up a discussion with themselves, and others, as to what issues might be the most important in this upcoming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election%2C_2012" rel="wikipedia" title="United States presidential election, 2012">2012 election</a>.<br />
<div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<i></i><i><span style="font-size: xx-small;">** Article first published as <a href="http://technorati.com/politics/article/reasons-91-100-of-hewitts-100/" target="_blank">Reasons 91-100 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012</a> on Technorati **</span></i><br />
<br /></div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie">
<img alt="" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=9b8b0817-61b7-40bf-b5db-483fcf4c957c" /></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-67936808063930173162012-10-03T07:29:00.000-07:002012-10-03T07:29:29.043-07:00Reasons 81-90 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012<div class="post-header">
</div>
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1787151212792745454" itemprop="description articleBody">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq_ODOyiKLSuojVqtAlp8KWoLXSx6hsHnj6UivpY9vUSs2NAFmHShqVJ-DoW5lmGLtwg-5FTMA7QmHb-r-kTjKvvKAH3BOjWxZznafRMyumIxMTGcKeFKvAH0wVpXm6Q0VZe3S6AX_7dc/s1600/Capture.JPG+-+R+vs+O+100+Reasons+Logo.JPG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq_ODOyiKLSuojVqtAlp8KWoLXSx6hsHnj6UivpY9vUSs2NAFmHShqVJ-DoW5lmGLtwg-5FTMA7QmHb-r-kTjKvvKAH3BOjWxZznafRMyumIxMTGcKeFKvAH0wVpXm6Q0VZe3S6AX_7dc/s400/Capture.JPG+-+R+vs+O+100+Reasons+Logo.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">It is time for a 45th <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency" rel="wikipedia" title="Presidency">Presidency</a> - To this end, <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com" href="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com/" rel="homepage" title="Hugh Hewitt">Hugh Hewitt</a> has come up with 100 reasons to vote for <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.mittromney.com" href="http://www.mittromney.com/" rel="homepage" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a> or against <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" rel="homepage" title="Barack Obama">Barack Obama</a> and these series of posts will highlight ten (or so) points to consider for your vote to have a 45th <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States" rel="wikipedia" title="President of the United States">President</a> elected come November 6, 2012. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks</span><br />
<br />
<b>Reasons 81-90 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012</b></div>
<br />
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Constitutional and environmental issues Lawyer/Professor, nationally syndicated afternoon issues talk show host, Hugh Hewitt delivered a tour de force presentation for three hours on the reasons why we need a change in executive leadership in the <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667&spn=10.0,10.0&q=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667%20(United%20States)&t=h" rel="geolocation" title="United States">United States</a>. This change can happen with our vote for president in the 2012 elections which early voting has already started in many states, but will officially take place November 6, 2012.<br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 81-90 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-81-90-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
This edition explores reasons 81-90 which highlight: This Administration's ability to cope with international economics and the problem of the Chinese Government's manipulation of their currency is a prime example. President Obama continues to lie about the facts surrounding the <a class="zem_slink" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.1166666667,20.0666666667&spn=0.1,0.1&q=32.1166666667,20.0666666667%20(Benghazi)&t=h" rel="geolocation" title="Benghazi">Benghazi, Libya</a> 9/11 terrorist attacks that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, one of them, a respected Ambassador. This 44th President hides from open questioning by ALL of the media and other open question town-hall settings. Obama will not appear on any Sunday or radio talk show venues (unless he gets snookered as he did with <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.univision.com/" rel="homepage" title="Univision">Univision Network</a> last month). Barack Obama obstructs the path to school reform through his backing the NEA and its activities. GM stock is worth less than half of what this 44th Presidency paid for it with our tax money ... <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.gm.com/" rel="homepage" title="General Motors">General Motors</a> is still not a success with the potential of 10's of billions dollars still owed to the taxpayer.<br />
<br />
In a presentation which Hugh Hewitt titled 100 reasons why you should vote for Mitt Romney and against Barack Obama, Hugh proceeded point by point with full explanation and in no particular order 100 specific reasons Mitt Romney would make a better president to lead our country mixed in with the specific reasons why Barack Obama has not been a successful leader in the more than 1,000 days he has been president.<br />
<br />
Since a three hour presentation of dense information may be a little hard to chew on in one session, here is one of ten postings that breaks up the 100 reasons in approximately 10 reason apiece chunks that can be savored and digested upon which one can become fully informed before making a freedom and country <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2012/09/reasons-1-10-of-hewitts-100-reasons-to.html#" id="_GPLITA_0" title="Click to Continue > by Text-Enhance">saving</a> vote in this most important election.<br />
<br />
Previously Published <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_engineering" rel="wikipedia" title="Audio engineering">Audio</a> Links:<br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 1-10 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-1-10-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 11-20 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-11-20-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 21-30 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-21-30-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 31-40 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-31-40-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 41-50 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-41-50-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 51-61 of 100 - <b><a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-51-61-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank">LISTEN HERE</a></b>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 62-70 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-62-70-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt's reasons 71-80 of 100 - <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-71-80-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from HughHewitt.com - </b><br />
<br />
<i><b>100 <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.reason.com/" rel="homepage" title="Reason (magazine)">Reason</a> To <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting" rel="wikipedia" title="Voting">Vote</a> For Mitt Romney Or Against Barack Obama</b><br />
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:12 PM</i><br />
<br />
<i>After yet another dispiriting Browns' performance yesterday, I decided to redeem the day by listing 100 reasons to either vote for Mitt Romney or against Barack Obama. I turned that list into a three hour monologue on today's show -- the first such in 12 years of radio.</i><br />
<br />
<i>It wasn't hard to do. Not hard at all. Which is why I think Romney will <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2012/09/reasons-1-10-of-hewitts-100-reasons-to.html#" id="_GPLITA_2" title="Click to Continue > by Text-Enhance">win</a> going away. The president is a failure, on every level and by every measurement. Americans don't endorse failure.</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com/blog/g/1f6da36a-b72f-4fa6-afd5-ee1d63c8697e" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
As the "Chicago Way" <a href="http://www.democrats.org/" rel="homepage" title="Democratic Party (United States)">Democrat</a> Political Party is fond of saying ... "Vote Early, and Vote Often" ... but most importantly, vote informed and reviewing all of Hewitt's 100 reasons to vote for Romney and against Obama 2012 may at least allow one to open up a discussion with themselves, and others, as to what issues might be the most important in this upcoming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election%2C_2012" rel="wikipedia" title="United States presidential election, 2012">2012 election</a>.<br />
<div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<i></i><i><span style="font-size: xx-small;">** Article first published as <a href="http://technorati.com/politics/article/reasons-81-90-of-hewitts-100/" target="_blank">Reasons 81-90 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012</a> on Technorati **</span></i><br />
<br /></div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie">
<img alt="" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=9b8b0817-61b7-40bf-b5db-483fcf4c957c" /></div>
... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1731565518656284913.post-36405857672688735322012-10-03T07:17:00.000-07:002012-10-03T07:17:18.371-07:00Reasons 71-80 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq_ODOyiKLSuojVqtAlp8KWoLXSx6hsHnj6UivpY9vUSs2NAFmHShqVJ-DoW5lmGLtwg-5FTMA7QmHb-r-kTjKvvKAH3BOjWxZznafRMyumIxMTGcKeFKvAH0wVpXm6Q0VZe3S6AX_7dc/s1600/Capture.JPG+-+R+vs+O+100+Reasons+Logo.JPG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq_ODOyiKLSuojVqtAlp8KWoLXSx6hsHnj6UivpY9vUSs2NAFmHShqVJ-DoW5lmGLtwg-5FTMA7QmHb-r-kTjKvvKAH3BOjWxZznafRMyumIxMTGcKeFKvAH0wVpXm6Q0VZe3S6AX_7dc/s400/Capture.JPG+-+R+vs+O+100+Reasons+Logo.JPG" width="400" /></a></div><span style="font-size: xx-small;">It is time for a 45th <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency" rel="wikipedia" title="Presidency">Presidency</a> - To this end, <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com" href="http://www.hughhewitt.townhall.com/" rel="homepage" title="Hugh Hewitt">Hugh Hewitt</a> has come up with 100 reasons to vote for <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.mittromney.com" href="http://www.mittromney.com/" rel="homepage" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a> or against <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/" rel="homepage" title="Barack Obama">Barack Obama</a> and these series of posts will highlight ten (or so) points to consider for your vote to have a 45th <a class="zem_slink" data-mce-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States" rel="wikipedia" title="President of the United States">President</a> elected come November 6, 2012. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks</span><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"></span><b>Reasons 71-80 Of Hewitt's 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012</b><br />
<br />
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Constitutional and environmental issues Lawyer/Professor, nationally syndicated afternoon issues talk show host, Hugh Hewitt delivered a tour de force presentation for three hours on the reasons why we need a change in executive leadership in the <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667&spn=10.0,10.0&q=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667%20%28United%20States%29&t=h" rel="geolocation" title="United States">United States</a>. This change can happen with our vote for president in the 2012 elections which early voting has already started in many states, but will officially take place November 6, 2012.<br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 71-80 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-71-80-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
This edition explores reasons 71-80 which highlight: During the formulation of ObamaCare, Barack Obama and the Democrats did not take this opportunity to rein in trial lawyers out-placed power to bring malpractice lawsuits and end the restrictions on insurance companies as it relates to interstate commerce (to open competition throughout all states).ObamaCare CUT Medicare by $760 Billion dollars in order to fund other parts of the law that has passed. ObamaCare is NOT universal healthcare by any measure. <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.biography.com/people/mitt-romney-241055" rel="biographycom" title="Willard Mitt Romney">Governor Mitt Romney</a> has a proven record of being able to actually work within a partisan political environment. Romney answers questions and tells the truth – conversely, Barack Obama lied to get into office in 2008 (transparency, cut the deficit by 50% by end of first term, and etc.), takes many minutes to address any question and never answers with a YES or a NO.Loosing the <a class="zem_slink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_bid_for_the_2016_Summer_Olympics" rel="wikipedia" title="Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics">Chicago Olympics</a> and accepting the <a class="zem_slink" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=59.9116666667,10.7336111111&spn=0.01,0.01&q=59.9116666667,10.7336111111%20%28Nobel%20Peace%20Prize%29&t=h" rel="geolocation" title="Nobel Peace Prize">Nobel Peace Prize</a> without any accomplishment are two activities that have a real understanding into Barack Obama’s character … just not the right things to do if one wants to actually be credible.<br />
<br />
In a presentation which Hugh Hewitt titled 100 reasons why you should vote for Mitt Romney and against Barack Obama, Hugh proceeded point by point with full explanation and in no particular order 100 specific reasons Mitt Romney would make a better president to lead our country mixed in with the specific reasons why Barack Obama has not been a successful leader in the more than 1,000 days he has been president.<br />
<br />
Since a three hour presentation of dense information may be a little hard to chew on in one session, here is one of ten postings that breaks up the 100 reasons in approximately 10 reason apiece chunks that can be savored and digested upon which one can become fully informed before making a freedom and country <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2012/09/reasons-1-10-of-hewitts-100-reasons-to.html#" id="_GPLITA_0" title="Click to Continue > by Text-Enhance">saving</a> vote in this most important election.<br />
<br />
Previously Published Audio Links:<br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 1-10 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-1-10-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 11-20 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-11-20-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 21-30 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-21-30-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 31-40 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-31-40-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 41-50 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-41-50-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 51-61 of 100 – <b><a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-51-61-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank">LISTEN HERE</a></b>>><br />
<br />
*** Hewitt’s reasons 62-70 of 100 – <a href="http://www.politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reasons-62-70-Hugh-Hewitt-100-reasons-why-you-should-vote-for-Mitt-Romney-and-against-Barack-Obama.mp3" target="_blank"><b>LISTEN HERE</b></a>>><br />
<br />
<b>This excerpted and edited from HughHewitt.com – </b><br />
<br />
<i><b>100 Reason To <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting" rel="wikipedia" title="Voting">Vote</a> For Mitt Romney Or Against Barack Obama</b><br />
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:12 PM</i><br />
<br />
<i>After yet another dispiriting Browns’ performance yesterday, I decided to redeem the day by listing 100 reasons to either vote for Mitt Romney or against Barack Obama. I turned that list into a three hour monologue on today’s show — the first such in 12 years of radio.</i><br />
<br />
<i>It wasn’t hard to do. Not hard at all. Which is why I think Romney will <a href="http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2012/09/reasons-1-10-of-hewitts-100-reasons-to.html#" id="_GPLITA_2" title="Click to Continue > by Text-Enhance">win</a> going away. The president is a failure, on every level and by every measurement. Americans don’t endorse failure.</i><br />
[<a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com/blog/g/1f6da36a-b72f-4fa6-afd5-ee1d63c8697e" target="_blank">Reference Here</a>]<br />
<br />
As the “Chicago Way” <a href="http://www.democrats.org/" rel="homepage" title="Democratic Party (United States)">Democrat</a> Political Party is fond of saying … “Vote Early, and Vote Often” … but most importantly, vote informed and reviewing all of Hewitt’s 100 reasons to vote for Romney and against Obama 2012 may at least allow one to open up a discussion with themselves, and others, as to what issues might be the most important in this upcoming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election%2C_2012" rel="wikipedia" title="United States presidential election, 2012">2012 election</a>.<br />
<div><br />
<br />
<i></i><i><span style="font-size: xx-small;">** Article first published as <a href="http://technorati.com/politics/article/reasons-71-80-of-hewitts-100/" target="_blank">Reasons 71-80 Of Hewitt’s 100 Reasons To Vote For Romney And Against Obama 2012</a> on Technorati **</span></i></div>... notes from The EDJEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357069669582242997noreply@blogger.com0