Anti-ObamaNation Anthem Drops Hard On War Room: Trump Won & Everyone Knows It

Logo for Stephen K. Bannon's Real America's Voice program WAR ROOM. Since the beginning of the virus pandemic that started with a leak of biologically modified "gain-of-function" research virus from an American tax-money supported lab in Wuhan, China. Today, March 16th, 2023, Bannon premiered the video "Trump Won" by Natasha Owens. Image Credit: Real America's Voice (2022).

Anti-ObamaNation Anthem Drops Hard On War Room: Trump Won & Everyone Knows It

If one were watching Stephen K. Bannon's WAR ROOM on Real America's Voice this morning - 7:00am PT - one was treated to a song put together and sung by noted Christian & Country music singer Natasha Owens titled Trump Won.

Before hitting the Bannon broadcast portal, Trump Won, the single has over 1 million views on YouTube ... and it is yet to be labeled with a warning for viewers as of the publication of this blog notice.

Natasha has won awards in Christian music and has performed with superstars from Michael W. Smith to Toby Keith. Her latest album is called “American Patriot,” the first single is “Stand For Life,” and can be found at - https://natashaowensmusic.com/ 

and accessed on music platforms at - 

https://ffm.to/patriot

This excerpted and edited from Gateway Pundit - 

Christian Music Artist Natasha Owens Releases New Single, “Trump Won” – Already Has Nearly One Million Views on Social Media – FBI Perplexed On How to Retaliate

By: Jim Hoft - Mar. 15, 2023 4:45pm

Natasha Owens’ latest release highlights the popular belief that the 2020 election was stolen and Joe Biden is an imposter.  Natasha mixed her belief with a catchy tune.  You will love it.

It is not clear yet how the FBI and deep state will react to Natasha’s forbidden speech.  Surely they are holding meetings and paying social media to clamp down on such heresy.

Via Brian Mayes publicist:

Conservative powerhouse Natasha Owens is doubling down with her boldest political anthem to date, “Trump Won.” Quietly released on Youtube and Rumble with no announcement or fanfare, the video has received over 950,000 views within the first 2 weeks and continues to grow in view counts each day.

“Everyone I know was so excited to have 4 more years of President Trump’s America First Agenda,” says Owens. “Thousands of people filled stadiums for President Trump while no one was showing up for the Joe Biden rallies. We all stayed up watching the election and we were so hopeful. But we all woke up to unexplainable events that happened overnight. In the months and years that followed there wasn’t much that was investigated and wrongs were not righted. Every time the topic came up people would say, ‘You know Trump won and ‘Everyone knows it’. When the film ‘2,000 Mules’ debuted I went to watch it. There was so much proof in that 2 hour documentary that Trump won. It just seemed that people were afraid to say it publicly. So I decided, it’s time for someone to sing about what is not talked about. Trump Won and You Know It.”

“Trump Won” comes on the heels of Owens’ most recent album, American Patriot — a bold, proud, powerful concept collection that bridges an unwavering love of country with the themes of faith and family that have always played a significant part in her artistry. The album includes notable tracks such as the powerful pro-life single, “Stand for Life,” as well as “America First,” a subtle tip of the hat to America First Policy Institute. The album also includes “Freedom Is The Song,” “Prayer For America,” and the soaring ballad, “Broad Stripes, Bright Stars,” as well as powerful new renditions of iconic standards: “God Bless America,” “My Country, ‘Tis Of Thee,” “America The Beautiful,” “The Star-Spangled Banner” and “God Bless The U.S.A.”

[Reference Here]

This could become the soundtrack of choice for watching the recently released revelatory J6 videos that have shattered regime lies about the Capitol uprising as spotlighted on Tucker Carlson Tonight - their staff is viewing the over 14,000 of publicly owned video previously never released.

At Carter's Second Term, we all know that elections have consequences - stolen elections have catastrophic consequences! Trump won and we know it!

ENDS

TAGS: Natasha Owens, Trump Won, WAR ROOM, Stephen K. Bannon, Gateway Pundit, American Patriot, Spotify, Apple Music, iTunes, Carter's Second Term

Barack H. Obama - The Perpetual Carter's Second Term - Politicizes Funeral

On July 30, 2020 in the run-up to the November 3rd, 2020 election for POTUS, former President Barack H. Obama delivers eulogy remarks that paid tribute to Representative John Lewis at his funeral, and called on lawmakers to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via Screengrab (2020)

Barack H. Obama - The Perpetual Carter's Second Term - Politicizes Funeral

This excerpted and edited from The New York Times -

Read the Full Transcript of Obama’s Eulogy for John Lewis
Mr. Obama praised Mr. Lewis, saying “he as much as anyone in our history brought this country a little bit closer to our highest ideals.”
By The New York Times - July 30, 2020

Former President Barack Obama delivered the eulogy at John Lewis’s funeral in Atlanta on Thursday, calling Mr. Lewis an “American whose faith was tested again and again to produce a man of pure joy and unbreakable perseverance.”

Here are Mr. Obama’s remarks in full:

James wrote to the believers, “Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance. Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, lacking nothing.”

It is a great honor to be back in Ebenezer Baptist Church, in the pulpit of its greatest pastor, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., to pay my respects to perhaps his finest disciple — an American whose faith was tested again and again to produce a man of pure joy and unbreakable perseverance — John Robert Lewis.

To those who have spoken to Presidents Bush and Clinton, Madam Speaker, Reverend Warnock, Reverend King, John’s family, friends, his beloved staff, Mayor Bottoms — I’ve come here today because I, like so many Americans, owe a great debt to John Lewis and his forceful vision of freedom.

Now, this country is a constant work in progress. We were born with instructions: to form a more perfect union. Explicit in those words is the idea that we are imperfect; that what gives each new generation purpose is to take up the unfinished work of the last and carry it further than anyone might have thought possible.

Eulogy Begins In Earnest

John Lewis — the first of the Freedom Riders, head of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, youngest speaker at the March on Washington, leader of the march from Selma to Montgomery, Member of Congress representing the people of this state and this district for 33 years, mentor to young people, including me at the time, until his final day on this Earth — he not only embraced that responsibility, but he made it his life’s work.

Which isn’t bad for a boy from Troy. John was born into modest means — that means he was poor — in the heart of the Jim Crow South to parents who picked somebody else’s cotton. Apparently, he didn’t take to farm work — on days when he was supposed to help his brothers and sisters with their labor, he’d hide under the porch and make a break for the school bus when it showed up. His mother, Willie Mae Lewis, nurtured that curiosity in this shy, serious child. “Once you learn something,” she told her son, “once you get something inside your head, no one can take it away from you.”

As a boy, John listened through the door after bedtime as his father’s friends complained about the Klan. One Sunday as a teenager, he heard Dr. King preach on the radio. As a college student in Tennessee, he signed up for Jim Lawson’s workshops on the tactic of nonviolent civil disobedience. John Lewis was getting something inside his head, an idea he couldn’t shake that took hold of him — that nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience were the means to change laws, but also change hearts, and change minds, and change nations, and change the world.

So he helped organize the Nashville campaign in 1960. He and other young men and women sat at a segregated lunch counter, well-dressed, straight-backed, refusing to let a milkshake poured on their heads, or a cigarette extinguished on their backs, or a foot aimed at their ribs, refused to let that dent their dignity and their sense of purpose. And after a few months, the Nashville campaign achieved the first successful desegregation of public facilities in any major city in the South.

John got a taste of jail for the first, second, third … well, several times. But he also got a taste of victory. And it consumed him with righteous purpose. And he took the battle deeper into the South.

That same year, just weeks after the Supreme Court ruled that segregation of interstate bus facilities was unconstitutional, John and Bernard Lafayette bought two tickets, climbed aboard a Greyhound, sat up front, and refused to move. This was months before the first official Freedom Rides. He was doing a test. The trip was unsanctioned. Few knew what they were up to. And at every stop, through the night, apparently the angry driver stormed out of the bus and into the bus station. And John and Bernard had no idea what he might come back with or who he might come back with. Nobody was there to protect them. There were no camera crews to record events. You know, sometimes, we read about this and kind of take it for granted. Or at least we act as if it was inevitable. Imagine the courage of two people Malia’s age, younger than my oldest daughter, on their own, to challenge an entire infrastructure of oppression.

John was only twenty years old. But he pushed all twenty of those years to the center of the table, betting everything, all of it, that his example could challenge centuries of convention, and generations of brutal violence, and countless daily indignities suffered by African Americans.

Like John the Baptist preparing the way, like those Old Testament prophets speaking truth to kings, John Lewis did not hesitate — he kept on getting on board buses and sitting at lunch counters, got his mug shot taken again and again, marched again and again on a mission to change America.

Spoke to a quarter million people at the March on Washington when he was just 23.

Helped organize the Freedom Summer in Mississippi when he was just 24.

At the ripe old age of 25, John was asked to lead the march from Selma to Montgomery. He was warned that Governor Wallace had ordered troopers to use violence. But he and Hosea Williams and others led them across that bridge anyway. And we’ve all seen the film and the footage and the photographs, and President Clinton mentioned the trench coat, the knapsack, the book to read, the apple to eat, the toothbrush — apparently jails weren’t big on such creature comforts. And you look at those pictures and John looks so young and he’s small in stature. Looking every bit that shy, serious child that his mother had raised and yet, he is full of purpose. God’s put perseverance in him.

And we know what happened to the marchers that day. Their bones were cracked by billy clubs, their eyes and lungs choked with tear gas. As they knelt to pray, which made their heads even easier targets, and John was struck in the skull. And he thought he was going to die, surrounded by the sight of young Americans gagging, and bleeding, and trampled, victims in their own country of state-sponsored violence.

And the thing is, I imagine initially that day, the troopers thought that they had won the battle. You can imagine the conversations they had afterwards. You can imagine them saying, “Yeah, we showed them.” They figured they’d turned the protesters back over the bridge; that they’d kept, that they’d preserved a system that denied the basic humanity of their fellow citizens. Except this time, there were some cameras there. This time, the world saw what happened, bore witness to Black Americans who were asking for nothing more than to be treated like other Americans. Who were not asking for special treatment, just the equal treatment promised to them a century before, and almost another century before that.

When John woke up, and checked himself out of the hospital, he would make sure the world saw a movement that was, in the words of Scripture, “hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed.” They returned to Brown Chapel, a battered prophet, bandages around his head, and he said more marchers will come now. And the people came. And the troopers parted. And the marchers reached Montgomery. And their words reached the White House — and Lyndon Johnson, son of the South, said “We shall overcome,” and the Voting Rights Act was signed into law.

The life of John Lewis was, in so many ways, exceptional. It vindicated the faith in our founding, redeemed that faith; that most American of ideas; that idea that any of us ordinary people without rank or wealth or title or fame can somehow point out the imperfections of this nation, and come together, and challenge the status quo, and decide that it is in our power to remake this country that we love until it more closely aligns with our highest ideals. What a radical ideal. What a revolutionary notion. This idea that any of us, ordinary people, a young kid from Troy can stand up to the powers and principalities and say no this isn’t right, this isn’t true, this isn’t just. We can do better. On the battlefield of justice, Americans like John, Americans like the Reverends Lowery and C.T. Vivian, two other patriots that we lost this year, liberated all of us that many Americans came to take for granted.

America was built by people like them. America was built by John Lewises. He as much as anyone in our history brought this country a little bit closer to our highest ideals. And someday, when we do finish that long journey toward freedom; when we do form a more perfect union — whether it’s years from now, or decades, or even if it takes another two centuries — John Lewis will be a founding father of that fuller, fairer, better America.

And yet, as exceptional as John was, here’s the thing: John never believed that what he did was more than any citizen of this country can do. I mentioned in the statement the day John passed, the thing about John was just how gentle and humble he was. And despite this storied, remarkable career, he treated everyone with kindness and respect because it was innate to him — this idea that any of us can do what he did if we are willing to persevere.

He believed that in all of us, there exists the capacity for great courage, that in all of us there is a longing to do what’s right, that in all of us there is a willingness to love all people, and to extend to them their God-given rights to dignity and respect. So many of us lose that sense. It’s taught out of us. We start feeling as if, in fact, that we can’t afford to extend kindness or decency to other people. That we’re better off if we are above other people and looking down on them, and so often that’s encouraged in our culture. But John always saw the best in us. And he never gave up, and never stopped speaking out because he saw the best in us. He believed in us even when we didn’t believe in ourselves. As a Congressman, he didn’t rest; he kept getting himself arrested. As an old man, he didn’t sit out any fight; he sat in, all night long, on the floor of the United States Capitol. I know his staff was stressed.

Eulogy Ends - Political Campaigning Begins

But the testing of his faith produced perseverance. He knew that the march is not yet over, that the race is not yet won, that we have not yet reached that blessed destination where we are judged by the content of our character. He knew from his own life that progress is fragile; that we have to be vigilant against the darker currents of this country’s history, of our own history, with their whirlpools of violence and hatred and despair that can always rise again.

[Democrat] Bull Connor may be gone. But today we witness with our own eyes police officers kneeling on the necks of Black Americans [in decades controlled Democrat Political Party cities]. George Wallace may be gone. But we can witness our federal government sending agents to use tear gas and batons against [riot fomenting] peaceful demonstrators. We may no longer have to guess the number of jelly beans in a jar in order to cast a ballot [in Democrat Political Party cities]. But even as we sit here, there are those in power are doing their darnedest to discourage people from voting — by closing polling locations, and targeting minorities and students with restrictive ID laws, and attacking our voting rights with surgical precision, even undermining the Postal Service in the run-up to an election that is going to be dependent on mailed-in ballots so people don’t get sick.

Now, I know this is a celebration of John’s life. There are some who might say we shouldn’t dwell on such things. But that’s why I’m talking about it. John Lewis devoted his time on this Earth fighting the very attacks on democracy and what’s best in America that we are seeing circulate right now.

He knew that every single one of us has a God-given power. And that the fate of this democracy depends on how we use it; that democracy isn’t automatic, it has to be nurtured, it has to be tended to, we have to work at it, it’s hard. And so he knew it depends on whether we summon a measure, just a measure, of John’s moral courage to question what’s right and what’s wrong and call things as they are. He said that as long as he had breath in his body, he would do everything he could to preserve this democracy. That as long as we have breath in our bodies, we have to continue his cause. If we want our children to grow up in a democracy — not just with elections, but a true democracy, a representative democracy, a big-hearted, tolerant, vibrant, inclusive [without any push-back from Constitutional Conservatives in the Republican Political Party] America of perpetual self-creation — then we are going to have to be more like John. We don’t have to do all the things he had to do because he did them for us. But we have got to do something. As the Lord instructed Paul, “Do not be afraid, go on speaking; do not be silent, for I am with you, and no one will attack you to harm you, for I have many in this city who are my people.” Just everybody’s just got to come out and vote. We’ve got all those people in the city but we can’t do nothing.

Like John, we have got to keep getting into that good trouble. He knew that nonviolent protest is patriotic; a way to raise public awareness, put a spotlight on injustice, and make the powers that be uncomfortable.

Like John, we don’t have to choose between protest and politics, it is not an either-or situation, it is a both-and situation. We have to engage in [peacefully, without riotous antics, as mentioned in the Constitution of the United States] protests where that is effective but we also have to translate our passion and our causes into laws and institutional practices. That’s why John ran for Congress thirty-four years ago.

Like John, we have got to fight even harder for the most powerful tool we have, which is the right to vote. The Voting Rights Act is one of the crowning achievements of our democracy. It’s why John crossed that bridge. It’s why he spilled his blood. And by the way, it was the result of Democratic and Republican efforts. President Bush, who spoke here earlier, and his father, both signed its renewal when they were in office. President Clinton didn’t have to because it was the law when he arrived so instead he made a law that made it easier for people to register to vote.

But once the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act, some state legislatures unleashed a flood of laws designed specifically to make voting harder, especially, by the way, state legislatures where there is a lot of minority turnout and population growth. That’s not necessarily a mystery or an accident. It was an attack on what John fought for. It was an attack on our democratic freedoms. And we should treat it as such.

If politicians want to honor John, and I’m so grateful for the legacy of work of all the Congressional leaders who are here, but there’s a better way than a statement calling him a hero. You want to honor John? Let’s honor him by revitalizing the law that he was willing to die for. And by the way, naming it the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, that is a fine tribute. But John wouldn’t want us to stop there, trying to get back to where we already were. Once we pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, we should keep marching to make it even better.

By making sure every American [and illegal/undocumented alien through motor-voter picture ID] is automatically registered to vote, including former inmates [recently released from their full sentences due to COVID-19 fears] who’ve earned their second chance.

By adding polling places, and expanding early voting, and making Election Day a national holiday, so if you are someone who is working in a factory, or you are a single mom who has got to go to her job and doesn’t get time off, you can still cast your ballot.

By guaranteeing that every American citizen has equal representation in our government, including the American citizens who live in Washington, D.C. and in Puerto Rico. They are Americans.

By ending some of the partisan [prevalent in decades controlled Democrat Political Party cities & states] gerrymandering — so that all voters have the power to choose their politicians, not the other way around.

And if all this takes eliminating the filibuster [installed by a Democrat Political Party controlled Congress] — another [instilled Democrat Political Party] Jim Crow relic — in order to secure the God-given rights of every American, then that’s what we should do.

And yet, even if we do all this — even if every bogus voter suppression law was struck off the books today — we have got to be honest with ourselves that too many of us choose not to exercise the franchise; that too many of our citizens believe their vote won’t make a difference, or they buy into the cynicism that, by the way, is the central strategy of voter suppression, to make you discouraged, to stop believing in your own power.

So we are also going to have to remember what John said: “If you don’t do everything you can to change things, then they will remain the same. You only pass this way once. You have to give it all you have.” As long as young people are protesting in the streets, hoping real change takes hold, I’m hopeful but we cannot casually abandon them at the ballot box. Not when few elections have been as urgent, on so many levels, as this one. We cannot treat voting as an errand to run if we have some time. We have to treat it as the most important action we can take on behalf of democracy.

Like John, we have to give it all we have.

I was proud that John Lewis was a friend of mine. I met him when I was in law school. He came to speak and I went up and I said, “Mr. Lewis, you are one of my heroes. What inspired me more than anything as a young man was to see what you and Reverend Lawson and Bob Moses and Diane Nash and others did.” And he got that kind of — aw shucks, thank you very much.

The next time I saw him, I had been elected to the United States Senate. And I told him, “John, I am here because of you.” On Inauguration Day in 2008, 2009, he was one of the first people that I greeted and hugged on that stand. I told him, “This is your day too.”

He was a good and kind and gentle man. And he believed in us — even when we don’t believe in ourselves. It’s fitting that the last time John and I shared a public forum was on Zoom. I am pretty sure that neither he nor I set up the Zoom call because we didn’t know how to work it. It was a virtual town hall with a gathering of young activists who had been helping to lead this summer’s demonstrations [and riots that burned buildings led by the Democrat Political Party's storm troops in the Marxist Black Lives Matter Movement and ANTIFA calling for the defunding of police departments across the nation] in the wake of George Floyd’s death. And afterwards, I spoke to John privately, and he could not have been prouder to see this new generation of activists standing up for freedom and equality; a new generation that was intent on voting and protecting the right to vote; in some cases, a new generation running for political office.

I told him, all those young people, John — of every race and every religion, from every background and gender and sexual orientation — John, those are your [Communist ideals embracing] children. They learned from your example, even if they didn’t always know it. They had understood, through him, what American citizenship [or coddled non-citizenship] requires, even if they had only heard about his courage through the history books [many that now have been banned and replaced].

“By the thousands, faceless, anonymous, relentless young people, Black and white … have taken our whole nation back to those great wells of [representative - with Electoral College] democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in the formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.”

Dr. King said that in the 1960s. And it came true again this summer.

We see it outside our windows, in big cities and rural towns, in men and women, young and old, straight Americans and LGBTQ Americans, Blacks who long for equal treatment and whites who can no longer accept freedom for themselves while witnessing the subjugation of their fellow Americans. We see it in everybody doing the hard work of overcoming complacency, of overcoming our own fears and our own prejudices, our own hatreds. You see it in people trying to be better, truer versions of ourselves.

And that’s what John Lewis teaches us. That’s where real courage comes from. Not from turning on each other, but by turning towards one another [in individual freedom and ideas acceptance]. Not by sowing hatred and division, but by spreading love and truth. Not by avoiding our responsibilities to create a better America and a better world, but by embracing those responsibilities with joy and perseverance and discovering that in our beloved community, we do not walk alone.

What a gift John Lewis was. We are all so lucky to have had him walk with us for a while, and show us the way.

God bless you all. God bless America. God bless this gentle soul who pulled it closer to its promise.
[Reference Here]

... Carter's Second Term, as the failed efforts at a best practices society through multi-cultural tribalism model, by the Racist and Left-Wing Democrat Political Party, continues.




TAGS: Barack Obama, Representative John Lewis, #BHO44, Democrat Political Party, NYT, Ebenezer Baptist Church, eulogy, John Lewis Voting Rights Act, Carter's Second Term

In This Age Of Virus Control: Healthcare Professionals Are Not Allowed To Break Through

Should arbitrary censorship be allowed for personal social media and interactive news sites? Image By: Coops Corner

In This Age Of Virus Control: Healthcare Professionals Are Not Allowed To Break Through

There are many in our country who erroneously believe that an invisible virus attack to a Human population is something that can be controlled - a virus can not be controlled.

What many in our society from healthcare & governmental Central Planners and their sycophants to Big Pharma operatives looking for profit are attempting to do, in the name of COVID-19 bending the curve and infection reduction, is control the sharing of communication through censorship.

With these people, First Amendment free speech, without editing or censorship right,s only apply to those who speak or share from the narrowly defined intended direction or messaging that will deliver the controlled desired effect, on a population they wish to be controlled, for their own powerful purposes.

Wither this control be for a direct slavery harnessing of a person's output of labor and intelligence, or for the controlled profit from a prescribed purchase upon which one may be healthy and/or just move about in relative freedom.

A video of healthcare workers and doctors in white coats, holding an open press conference from in front of the Supreme Court building, gave testimony on their direct experiences of using widely known and very inexpensive chemical protocols in treating COVID-19 pandemic. This video of the event has since caused a major censorship discussion on social media since these very same social media portals that have unilaterally censored discussions about what actually effects our American First Amendment lives.

This excerpted and edited from SF NEWS -

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Remove Video of 'Doctors' Who Were Denouncing Masks, Promoting Hydroxychloroquine
By: Jay C. Barmann, 28 JULY 2020 / SF NEWS - fiction writer,  web editor who's lived in San Francisco for 19 years

A group calling themselves "America's Frontline Doctors," which seems to have been formed two weeks ago and whose website has already disappeared, promoted the insane video via Breitbart News. And in it, these doctors — none of whom is apparently an epidemiologist — stage an official-seeming press conference in which they say things like "you don't need masks" to prevent spread of the coronavirus, and hydroxychloroquine actually works to treat severe cases — both positions that have been debunked by science and actual doctors.

As CNN reports, President Trump had shared multiple versions of the video on Twitter Monday night before it was removed, and according to Breitbart, the video had racked up 17 million views on Facebook and tens of thousands more on YouTube.

A lab-coated woman [a trained and employed Doctor born in Africa and familiar with Malaria protocols] in the video claims, "This virus has a cure, it's called hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and Zithromax," and says that masks aren't necessary because this "cure" exists.
----
Facebook didn't manage to remove the video before it racked up millions of views, but ultimately it did. "We've removed this video for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19," a Facebook spokesperson tells CNN, adding that they were alerting people who had commented on or shared the video that these claims have been debunked by the World Health Organization.

Twitter was working to remove multiple versions of the video on Monday night, and YouTube likewise removed the video saying it violated community guidelines.

Before politics and potentials of profit through a dictated and controlled vaccine path to a potential end of fear-mongering and tyranny in handling COVID-19, this graph shows clearly that a recommended therapeutic approach included what these America's Frontline Doctors were giving testimony on - hydroxychloroquine (over one-billion doses administered since it became an understood therapeutic in the mid 1950s), zinc, and Zithromax. Image Credit: Elsevier (2020) 

Dr. Simone Gold, a Los Angeles-based emergency medicine specialist, is the supposed leader of "America's Frontline Doctors," and she has previously served as a talking head on Fox News saying that stay-at-home orders aren't necessary. She's also spouted the very Trumpian opinion that there is "no scientific basis that the average American should be concerned" about Covid-19, despite the fact that cases are surging nationwide, young people are dying, and we're about to cross the 150,000 mark of Americans who have died from it.

Another doctor featured in the video, African-born pediatrician [not properly described above] and religious minister Stella Immanuel, gets up and touts the benefits of hydroxychloroquine — claiming to have treated over 300 COVID patients [350] in Houston with the drug to great success [zero deaths and full elimination of the virus]. She is the one making the claim about the "cure" and saying masks and lockdowns aren't necessary. She also has a history of making insane claims about other medical issues, as The Daily Beast [another Left-Wing Media Complex publisher] points out, saying that endometriosis and uterine cysts are caused by people having sex with demons in their dreams. And she reportedly thinks the government is run by aliens.

Somehow, in the ignorant corners of America and Trump's mind, it's still important to make the pandemic into a political fight, while the entire world watches in amusement and horror at how badly this country has bungled the fight against the virus, which knows no political allegiance.

So, thank you Trump, and thank you "America's Frontline Doctors" for giving voters yet another reason to see you for the venal and immoral people that you are. None of this makes sense except if you are a moron who believes that every other news organization in the world besides Fox and Breitbart is lying for some unfathomable reason, and down is up and the sky is green.
[Reference Here]

The national responses to this COVID-19/Wuhan Red Death pandemic from China in France and India have experienced the similar positive results of shutting down the infectious effects of this highly contagious corona-virus through the use of hydroxychloroquine (over one-billion doses administered since it became an understood therapeutic in the mid 1950s), zinc, and Zithromax.

Censorship will not allow an honest depiction of what these Doctors and Healthcare professionals had attempted to do by adding their testimony to this highly charged, Left-Wing controlled, communications atmosphere during an election year.

Especially ... when decidedly slanted reviews and vindictive as posted here by SF NEWS isn't subjected to the same confining structure in communication.

What can we expect in this age of virus control during the Democrat Political Party's continuing prosecution of post #BHO44 - Carter's Second Term.




TAGS: hydroxychloroquine, zinc, Zithromax, COVID-19, therapeutic, treatment, First Amendment, free speech, Carter's Second Term, #BHO44

COVID-911: A Wuhan Red Death Story

COVID-911: A Wuhan Red Death Story

Story line and landmark travels through the Novel Coronavirus, COVID-19, health event that has shaped the experiences endured by people living in these United States. Watch this video to gain an insight about why the world is in chaos right now.

#DJT45 has been ten steps ahead of all the DEEP STATE players and their attempt to throw this world into a Cloward & Piven strategy of chaos and bring in their dream of a Globalist ideal of The New World Order. Some have termed this health event, turned political takeover ... COVID-1984. 

The CDC states COVID-19, the Wuhan Virus, if caught, has an overall survivable rate of 99.74% - or the converse of the morbidity (death) rate of 0.26% - less than 3/10ths of 1 percent. 

The Control Freaks can’t stop what’s coming.

TAGS: Novel Coronavirus, COVID-19, Wuhan Red Death, China, CDC, World Health Organization, Left-Wing, DEEP STATE, #DJT45, Carter's Second Term

Former VP Joe Biden Channels 80's Cyber Character Max Headroom

The figure of Joe Biden breaks up during a live presentation of a COVID-19 social distancing consciousness campaign rally. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via Snipping Tool (2020) 

Former VP Joe Biden Channels 80's Cyber Character Max Headroom

So here we go - future elected head of the Democrat Political Party, Joe Biden, as its candidate to run against the sitting 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, held a COVID-19 virtual campaign rally on the interwebs from Tampa Bay, Florida.

Many who must have planned this, said to themselves, what a great idea because we can get our nominee some face time with potential voters in an important swing state. The campaign contacted local station WTSP, virtual and VHF digital channel 10, a CBS-affiliated television station licensed to St. Petersburg, Florida, United States that also serves the community of Tampa Bay.

This is what they had posted at their YouTube site:

Joe Biden holds virtual rally for Tampa, Florida | 10 Tampa Bay
71,933 views • Streamed live on May 7, 2020 - 10 Tampa Bay - 28.3K subscribers

Social-distancing limitations are preventing candidates from holding crowded campaign rallies, so former Vice President Joe Biden is hosting a virtual rally for people in Tampa. Earlier today, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee held a virtual roundtable with community leaders in Jacksonville.

►Subscribe: https://on.wtsp.com/youtube
►Website: https://www.wtsp.com/
►Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/10TampaBay
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/10TampaBay

No! This isn't the virtual rally, but Max Headroom, an '80's television comedy character actually ends up being more coherent in this over seven minute clip than everyone in the nearly forty-five minute Biden virtual campaign rally.

This excerpted and edited from FOX 13 News -

Biden's virtual rally for Tampa falters, plagued by technical issues
By Evan Axelbank - FOX 13 News

The era of virtual campaigning did not start well for Joe Biden.

A 45-minute rally targeted at a Tampa audience did not go as planned, as it was rife with poor audio quality, choppy video, and a candidate who wasn't even sure when he was on camera.

For just under 10 minutes [starting at 37:00 minutes], the former vice president spoke from a Florida-like setting at his home in Delaware.

Virtual rallies are a way for the presumptive Democratic nominee to target areas that will be crucial for his White House run, while still practicing social distancing.

"In the thick of this crisis, Florida has the worst rate of fulfilling unemployment claims of any state in the country," Biden said. "It's no surprise, the unemployment system was allowed to be hollowed out by Gov. Scott in 2011."

His theme: President Trump isn't equipped to handle a pandemic.

"This crisis is revealing so much about our society, including just how critical it is to have competence in government," Biden said.

Facebook entry on a timeline that reflects this author's instant impression of what he had witnessed on a report showing the video internet NETCODE effected glitches of Joe Biden's virtual campaign rally. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via Snipping Tool 2020

At one point, about 2,600 were watching live on YouTube, though the number dropped to about 2,000 as the tech problems went on, which included a six-minute period of black screen during the warm-up speakers.

Before the rally, the Trump campaign held a conference call with reporters and one of their main points is that they consider their digital outreach efforts far ahead of the Biden campaign's.

"We are absolutely crushing it here on the ground in Florida and we are not going to stop," said Florida GOP chair Joe Gruters.

After the rally, the Biden campaign declined to answer any further questions about the technical issues.
[Reference Here]

One can only suspect that most of the folks on the Joe Biden 2020 campaign staff never saw Max Headroom, for it would have provided some instant levity, call it the riches of embarrassment, in a dismal display of political professionalism.

This Democrat Political Party era will always be known here, and in the hearts and minds of embarrassed, yet well meaning Democrats, as Carter's Second Term.




TAGS: Joe Biden, Tampa Bay, 10 Tampa, WTSP, CBS, FOX 13, virtual, cyber, digital, NETCODE, political campaign, Democrat Political Party, Max Headroom, Carter's Second Term

Problem-Reaction-Solution: Death Of A Free Society Through Healthcare Part One

Documentary subject Dr. Judy Mikowits PhD as she talks with interviewer/producer Mikki Willis as they explore the nature of vaccines and how a culture has come to lead to this COVID-19 pandemic event point in time occurance. Image Credit: Edmund Jenks via PlandemicMovie.com (2020)

Problem-Reaction-Solution: Death Of A Free Society Through Healthcare Part One

The reason for this posting here at Carter's Second Term is to assure that a version of the premade segments that are being used to promote an informational movie get published broadly on our interwebs. The original YouTube posting of this video was taken down by YouTube for reasons that will make themselves very clear once one has viewed the video posting.

The doctor interviewed in this video, Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD began to have real problems communicating what she was discovering, to the world, in 2011 during the Barack H. Obama Administration - hence Carter's Second Term.

ADDITIONALLY, WATCH NEW INTERVIEW VIDEO HERE

Interviewed by Producer | Cinematographer | Director Mikki Willis, Dr. Mikovits delivers a very stirring personal account of the biggest trial in her medical professional life, how does one communicate about a culture that has created a structure to eliminate a pursuit of best practices over Human activity, mass control, and extreme profit?

If this presentation is of interest to you, enough to be able to archive a copy of this video for sharing and additional viewing, please go to Plandemic Movie dot com and download a MP4 version for your files.

[5/7/2020 UPDATE - most all video assets have been taken down]

Since this 20 minute plus Part 1 featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits PhD is the first of several promotional interest presentations, there will be more to come before the feature length Plandemic Movie is released in SUMMER 2020.

Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science - Book by Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively - Released for sale on April 14, 2020

About the Authors:
Kent Heckenlively, JD, is a former attorney, a founding editor of Age of Autism, and a science teacher. During college Heckenlively worked for US Senator Pete Wilson, and in law school he was a writer and an editor of the school’s law review and spent his summers working for the US Attorney’s Office in San Francisco. Kent and his wife Linda live in Northern California with their two children, Jacqueline and Ben.

Judy Mikovits, PhD, spent twenty years at the National Cancer Institute, working with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founding fathers of human retrovirology, and has coauthored more than forty scientific papers. She co-founded and directed the first neuroimmune disease institute using a systems biology approach in 2006. Dr. Mikovits lives in Southern California with her husband, David.

AVAILABLE Here - Please Read Editorial Reviews >>>

Everyone knows, we have never left the control and corruption of ... Carter's Second Term!




TAGS: Mikki Willis, Dr. Mikovits PhD, Vaccine, COVID-19, Human activity, mass control, extreme profit, Dr. Anthony Fauci, WHO, CDC, Bill Gates, UN, Carter's Second Term, Plandemic, Summer 2020

Obama's DEEP STATE Unravels & Fails At Every Turn Says Historian Victor Davis Hanson

#DJT45 riding the legacy of the Barack H. Obama Executive Branch tidal wave of political corruption.
Image Credit: Doug Giles via Facebook

Obama's DEEP STATE Unravels & Fails At Every Turn Says Historian Victor Davis Hanson

We find ourselves two years and one month post the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama and its final overt vestiges are finally beginning to implode and end their effectiveness.

Our country, which faced a choice of having a one-party political rule - Democrat Political Party with the strong support of Establishment Republican Political Party protecting the back door - elected blue-collar billionaire Donald J. Trump against all odds and federal government power with the forceful aid of the Left-Wing Media & Entertainment Complex.

Recently, Andrew McCabe, who served as the Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from February 2016 to January 2018 and from May 9, 2017, to August 2, 2017, served as the Acting Director of the FBI following James Comey's dismissal by President Donald Trump, was interviewed by 60 Minutes with revelations about the conspiracy within the FBI that is now falling apart.

The attitude held by the Democrat Political Party today. Resistance and division continues to be pursued within the Federal Government and by the political leadership still headed by the former president Barack H. Obama.
Image Credit: Facebook Timeline

This has been a long process initiated by those at the very top of the leadership of the Democrat Political Party and these efforts began well before the election cycle of 2016, and continued in its effort to oust a duly elected opposition President through the following elements analyzed and diagnosed by Victor Davis Hanson:

Preparing the Battlefield - Weaponizing the Deep State - The Mueller Investigation - The Palace Coup

This excerpted and edited from American Greatness by historian Victor Davis Hanson -

Autopsy of a Dead Coup
February 17th, 2019

The illegal effort to destroy the 2016 Trump campaign by Hillary Clinton campaign’s use of funds to create, disseminate among court media, and then salt among high Obama administration officials, a fabricated, opposition smear dossier failed.

So has the second special prosecutor phase of the coup to abort the Trump presidency failed. There are many elements to what in time likely will become recognized as the greatest scandal in American political history, marking the first occasion in which U.S. government bureaucrats sought to overturn an election and to remove a sitting U.S. president.

A Hitch Cartoon. Image Credit: Facebook Timeline

Preparing the Battlefield

No palace coup can take place without the perception of popular anger at a president.

The deep state is by nature cowardly. It does not move unless it feels it can disguise its subterranean efforts or that, if revealed, those efforts will be seen as popular and necessary—as expressed in tell-all book titles such as fired FBI Directors James Comey’s Higher Loyalty or in disgraced Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s psychodramatic The Threat.

In candidate and President Trump’s case that prepping of the battlefield translated into a coordinated effort among the media, political progressives and celebrities to so demonize Trump that his imminent removal likely would appear a relief to the people. Anything was justified that led to that end.

All through the 2016 campaign and during the first two years of the Trump presidency the media’s treatment, according to liberal adjudicators of press coverage, ran about 90 percent negative toward Trump—a landmark bias that continues today.

Journalists themselves consulted with the Clinton campaign to coordinate attacks. From the Wikileaks trove, journalistic grandees such as John Harwood, Mark Leibovich, Dana Milbank, and Glenn Thrush often communicated (and even post factum were unapologetic about doing so) with John Podesta’s staff to construct various anti-Trump themes and have the Clinton campaign review or even audit them in advance.

Some contract “journalists” apparently were paid directly by Fusion GPS—created by former reporters Glen Simpson of the Wall Street Journal and Susan Schmidt of the Washington Post—to spread lurid stories from the dossier. Others more refined like Christiane Amanpour and James Rutenberg had argued for a new journalistic ethos that partisan coverage was certainly justified in the age of Trump, given his assumed existential threat to The Truth. Or as Rutenberg put it in 2016: “If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, non-opinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable. But the question that everyone is grappling with is: Do normal standards apply? And if they don’t, what should take their place?”

I suppose Rutenberg never considered that half the country might have considered the Hillary Clinton presidency “potentially dangerous,” and yet did not expect the evening news, in 90 percent of its coverage, to reflect such suspicions.

The Democratic National Committee’s appendages often helped to massage CNN news coverage—such as Donna Brazile’s primary debate tip-off to the Clinton campaign or CNN’s consultation with the DNC about forming talking points for a scheduled Trump interview.

So-called “bombshell,” “watershed,” “turning-point,” and “walls closing in” fake news aired in 24-hour news bulletin cycles. The media went from fabrications about Trump’s supposed removal of the bust of Martin Luther King, Jr. from the Oval Office, to the mythologies in the Steele dossier, to lies about the Trump Tower meeting, to assurances that Michael Cohen would testify to Trump’s suborning perjury, and on and on.

CNN soon proved that it is no longer a news organization at all—as reporters like Gloria Borger, Chris Cuomo, Eric Lichtblau, Manu Raju, Brian Rokus, Jake Tapper, Jeff Zeleny, and teams such as Jim Sciutto, Carl Bernstein, and Marshall Cohen as well as Thomas Frank, and Lex Harris all trafficked in false rumors and unproven gossip detrimental to Trump, while hosts and guest hosts such as Reza Aslan, the late Anthony Bourdain, and Anderson Cooper stooped to obscenity and grossness to attack Trump.

Both politicos and celebrities tried to drive Trump’s numbers down to facilitate some sort of popular ratification for his removal. Hollywood and the coastal corridor punditry exhausted public expressions of assassinating or injuring the president, as the likes of Jim Carrey, Johnny Depp, Robert de Niro, Peter Fonda, Kathy Griffin, Madonna, Snoop Dogg, and a host of others vied rhetorically to slice apart, shoot, beat up, cage, behead, and blow up the president.

Left wing social media and mainstream journalism spread sensational lies about supposed maniacal Trump supporters in MAGA hats. They constructed fantasies that veritable white racists were now liberated to run amuck insulting and beating up people of color as they taunted the poor and victimized minorities with vicious Trump sloganeering—even as the Covington farce and now the even more embarrassing Jussie Smollett charade evaporated without apologies from the media and progressive merchants of such hate.

At the same time, liberal attorneys, foundations, Democratic politicians, and progressive activists variously sued to overturn the election on false charges of rigged voting machines. They sought to subvert the Electoral College. They introduced articles of impeachment. They sued to remove Trump under the Emoluments Clause. They attempted to invoke the 25th Amendment. And they even resurrected the ossified Logan Act—before focusing on the appointment of a special counsel to discredit the Trump presidency. Waiting for the 2020 election was seen as too quaint.

Faked information used to create the illusion of actual muli-sourced verification of real information through leaks to a compliant 4th Estate in order to have permission to spy on a competitive political campaign via the Department Of Justice through the FISA Warrant process. Image Credit: Facebook Timeline

Weaponizing the Deep State

During the 2016 election, the Obama Department of Justice warped the Clinton email scandal investigation, from Bill Clinton’s secret meeting on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, to unethical immunity given to the unveracious Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, to James Comey’s convoluted predetermined treatment of “likely winner” Clinton, and to DOJ’s Bruce Ohr’s flagrant conflict of interests in relation to Fusion GPS.

About a dozen FBI and DOJ grandees have now resigned, retired, been fired, or reassigned for unethical and likely illegal behavior—and yet have not faced criminal indictments. The reputation of the FBI as venerable agency is all but wrecked. Its administrators variously have libeled the Trump voters, expressed hatred for Trump, talked of “insurance policies” in ending the Trump candidacy, and inserted informants into the Trump campaign.

The former Obama directors of the CIA and National Intelligence, with security clearances intact, hit the television airways as paid “consultants” and almost daily accused the sitting president of Russian collusion and treason—without cross-examination or notice that both previously had lied under oath to Congress (and did so without subsequent legal exposure), and both were likely knee-deep in the dissemination of the Steele dossier among Obama administration officials.

John Brennan’s CIA likely helped to spread the Fusion GPS dossier among elected and administrative state officials. Some in the NSC in massive and unprecedented fashion requested the unmasking of surveilled names of Trump subordinates, and then illegally leaked them to the press.

The FISA courts, fairly or not, are now mostly discredited, given they either were willingly or naively hoodwinked by FBI and DOJ officials who submitted as chief evidence for surveillance on American citizens, an unverified dossier—without disclosure that the bought campaign hit-piece was paid for by Hillary Clinton, authored by a discredited has-been British agent, relied on murky purchased Russian sources, and used in circular fashion to seed news accounts of supposed Trump misbehavior.

DEEP STATE friends hire friends to take on the post election effort to oust a duly elected sitting POTUS. Much of the facts that led up to the appointment of a Special Counsel investigation without a crime are detailed in the book by Gregg Jarrett, The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump.
Image Credit: Barnes and Noble  

The Mueller Investigation

The Crown Jewel in the coup was the appointment of special counsel Robert Muller to discover supposed 2016 Trump-Russian election collusion. Never has any special investigation been so ill-starred from its conception.

Mueller’s appointment was a result of his own friend James Comey’s bitter stunt of releasing secret, confidential and even classified memos of presidential conversations. Acting DOJ Attorney Rod Rosenstein appointed a former colleague Mueller—although as a veteran himself of the Clinton email scandal investigations and the FISA fraudulent writ requests, Rosenstein was far more conflicted than was the recused Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Mueller then packed his investigative team with lots of Clinton donors and partisans, some of whom had legally represented Clinton subordinates and even the Clinton Foundation or voiced support for anti-Trump movements.

Mueller himself and Andrew Weissmann have had a long record of investigatory and prosecutorial overreach that had on occasion resulted in government liability and court mandated federal restitution. In such polarized times, neither should have involved in such an investigation. Two subordinate FBI investigators were caught earlier on conducting an affair over their FBI-issued cell phones, and during the election cycle they slurred the object of their subsequent investigation, ridiculed Trump voters, and bragged that Trump would never be elected. Mueller later staggered, and then hid for weeks the reasons for, their respective firings.

The team soon discovered there was no Trump-Russian 2016 election collusion—and yet went ahead to leverage Trump campaign subordinates on process crimes in hopes of finding some culpability in Trump’s past 50-year business, legal, and tax records. The point was not to find who colluded with whom (if it had been, then Hillary Clinton would be now indicted for illegally hiring with campaign funds a foreign national to buy foreign fabrications to discredit her opponent), but to find the proper mechanism to destroy the presumed guilty Donald Trump.

The Mueller probe has now failed in that gambit of proving “collusion” (as even progressive investigative reporters and some FBI investigators had predicted), but succeeded brilliantly in two ways.

The “counterintelligence” investigation subverted two years of the Trump presidency by constant leaks that Trump soon would be indicted, jailed, disgraced, or impeached. As a result, Trump’s stellar economic and foreign policy record would never earn fifty percent of public support.

Second, Mueller’s preemptive attacks offered an effective offensive defense for the likely felonious behavior of John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok, and a host of others. While the Mueller lawyers threatened to destroy the lives of bit players like Jerome Corsi, George Papadopoulos, and Roger Stone, they de facto provided exemption to a host of the Washington hierarchy who had lied under oath, obstructed justice, illegally leaked to the press, unmasked and leaked names of surveilled Americans, and misled federal courts under the guise of a “higher loyalty” to the cause of destroying Donald J. Trump.

Listing of the 58 Democrat Political Party representatives in the House Of Congress that voted to oust the 45th President Of The United States, Donald J. Trump - a Nay vote equaled a yes vote to impeach.
Image Credit: Facebook Timeline

The Palace Coup

All of the above came to a head with the firing of the chronic leaker FBI Director James Comey (who would lie to the president about his not being a target of an FBI investigation, lie to House investigatory committees by pleading amnesia and ignorance on 245 occasions, and repeatedly lie to his own FBI bureaucrats).

In May 2017, acting FBI director Andrew McCabe took over from the fired Comey. His candidate wife recently had been a recipient of huge Clinton-related campaign PAC donations shortly before he began investigating the Clinton email scandal. McCabe would soon be cited by the Inspector General for lying to federal investigators on numerous occasions—cynically stooping even to lie to his own New York FBI subordinates to invest scarce resources to hunt for their own nonexistent leaks as a mechanism for disguising his own quite real and illegal leaking.

The newly promoted McCabe apparently felt that it was his moment to become famous for taking out a now President Trump. Thus, he assembled a FBI and DOJ cadre to open a counterintelligence investigation of the sitting president on no other grounds but the fumes of an evaporating Clinton opposition dossier and perceived anger among the FBI that their director had just been fired. In addition, apparently now posing as Andrew McCabe, MD, he informally head counted how many of Trump’s own cabinet members could be convinced by McCabe’s own apparent medical expertise to help remove the president on grounds of physical and mental incapacity under the 25th Amendment. This was an attempted, albeit pathetic, coup against an elected president and the first really in the history of the United States.

At one point, McCabe claims that the acting Attorney General of the United States Rod Rosenstein volunteered to wear a wire to entrap his boss President Trump—in the manner of Trump’s own attorney Michael Cohen’s entrapment of Trump, in the manner of James Comey taking entrapment notes on confidential Trump one-on-one meetings and leaking them to the press, and in the manner of the Department of Justice surveilling Trump subordinates through FISA and other court authorizations.

McCabe was iconic of an utterly corrupt FBI Washington hierarchy, which we now know from the behavior of its disgraced and departed leadership. They posed as patriotic scouts, but in reality proved themselves arrogant, smug, and incompetent. They harbored such a sense of superiority that they were convinced they could act outside the law in reifying an “insurance policy” that would end the Trump presidency.

The thinking of the conspirators initially had been predicated on three assumptions thematic during this three-year long government effort to destroy Trump:

One, during 2016, Hillary Clinton would certainly win the election and FBI and DOJ unethical and illegal behavior would be forgotten if not rewarded, given the Clintons’ own signature transgressions and proven indifference to the law;

Two, Trump was so controversial and the fabricated dossier was so vile and salacious, that seeded rumors of Trump’s faked perversity gave them de facto exemptions to do whatever they damned pleased;

Three, Trump’s low polls, his controversial reset of American policy, and the general contempt in which he was held by the bipartisan coastal elite, celebrities, and the deep state, meant that even illegal means to continue the campaign-era effort to destroy Trump and now abort his presidency were felt to be moral and heroic acts without legal consequences, and the media would see the conspirators as heroes.

In sum, the Left and the administrative state, in concert with the media, after failing to stop the Trump campaign, regrouped. They ginned up a media-induced public hysteria, with the residue of the Hillary Clinton campaign’s illegal opposition research, and manipulated it to put in place a special counsel, stocked with partisans.

Then, not thugs in sunglasses and epaulettes, not oligarchs in private jets, not shaggy would-be Marxists, but sanctimonious arrogant bureaucrats in suits and ties used their government agencies to seek to overturn the 2016 election, abort a presidency, and subvert the U.S. Constitution. And they did all that and more on the premise that they were our moral superiors and had uniquely divine rights to destroy a presidency that they loathed.

Shame on all these failed conspirators and their abettors, and may these immoral people finally earn a long deserved legal and moral reckoning.
[Reference Here]

We, at Carter's Second Term (the #BHO44 Administration which seems to never end), have this (these immoral people finally earn a long deserved legal and moral reckoning) as our over-riding hope, but know that the tentacles of those in Federal Government power will do everything to keep this power at all costs, even at the destruction of the founding documents of our grand experiment in human self-reliance and individual power over mob rule that allows the United States to remain that shining city on the hill.




TAGS: Victor Davis Hanson, VDH, Coup, DEEP STATE, FBI, DOJ, CIA, Barack Obama, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, John Brennan, John Podesta, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Donald J. Trump, Carter's Second Term

Congressional Review Act Can Effectively End The Obama Carter's Second Term

Newly inaugurated 45th President of the United States signs his first executive order in the Oval Office of the White House. Image Credit: Getty Images (2017) 

Congressional Review Act Can Effectively End The Obama Carter's Second Term

The Congressional Review Act (CRA) is an oversight tool that Congress may use to repeal or prevent a regulation issued by a federal agency from taking effect. The CRA was included in the “Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996” and allows Congress to review, and to cancel by majority rule, new federal regulations issued by federal agencies.

The Bitter Clingers - Cartoon by Ben Garrison

This excerpted and edited from Bloomberg Government -

How to use the Congressional Review Act to undo regulatory actions
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP - Kevin O'Neill, Dana Weekes, Sara Garofalo Linder & Roxana Boyd - January 26, 2017

With a Republican sweep of Congress and the executive branch, there will be a concerted effort this year to reform and restrain the current regulatory state. The Trump Administration and Republican Congress have a number of options to repeal regulations issued by the Obama Administration, with the Congressional Review Act (CRA) being one vehicle for affirmatively undoing some of the regulatory actions of the last six months.

The CRA is an oversight tool that Congress may use to repeal or prevent a regulation issued by a federal agency from taking effect. The 1996 law grants Congress: (1) proper notification of new agency regulations; and (2) the authority to use a joint resolution of disapproval to overturn a rule that may not meet the congressional intent. Under the CRA, a joint resolution of disapproval can only repeal an interim final rule or final rule in its entirety, as it does not necessarily apply to draft regulations, and Congress cannot use it to reform parts of a rule.

Congress has only successfully overturned one rule under the CRA since its enactment in 1996, the final rule on ergonomics standards issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under the Clinton Administration.
----
5 things you need to know about the CRA:

1. As Congress has only repealed a rule under the CRA once before, more than 15 years ago, there are many unknown questions, including procedural questions and how a federal agency can engage on the issue following a repeal of the rule.

2. For rules issued by the Obama Administration on or after January 3, 2017, Congress has 60 legislative days from when the agency publishes each rule in the Federal Register or when Congress receives the rule report, whichever date is later, to use the CRA to repeal the regulation.

3. For a rule issued by the Obama Administration from June 13, 2016 (the parliamentarian in each chamber will set the actual date) through January 2, 2017, Congress has 60 legislative days starting from January 31 in the House and January 24 in the Senate to use the CRA to repeal the regulation.

4. Any use of the CRA cannot be filibustered in the Senate, which disadvantages those Democrats looking to challenge Republican efforts to restrain the current regulatory state.

5. Repealing a rule under the CRA likely foreclosures opportunities for a federal agency to reengage on the matter through a rulemaking for at least the next four years.
[Reference Here]

Interestingly, during President Obama's first two years in office, Congress did not use the CRA to repeal any Bush Administration final rules, despite the Democratic control of Congress.

President Donald J. Trump give his inauguration address with House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell looking on. Image Credit Getty Images (2017)

This excerpted and edited from Washington Examiner -

Obscure rule about to take center stage in regulation rollbacks
By SUSAN FERRECHIO (@SUSANFERRECHIO) - 1/23/17 12:01 AM

Republicans this month will invoke the rarely used Congressional Review Act to extinguish some of the Obama administration's more recent regulations they believe will damage the economy.
----
The GOP controls the majorities in both chambers and President Trump is eager to sign the legislation undoing the regulations, which affect the environment, education and jobs.
----
"There is only a rare set of circumstances in which you can use it," Rutgers University professor Stuart Shapiro, a public policy expert, told the Washington Examiner.

Republicans have for years talked of undoing Obama administration regulations through legislation, but the CRA gives them an easier route in the Senate by allowing Republicans to avert the 60-vote filibuster. The CRA can be applied only to regulations issued within 60 legislative days.

"We are going to do that very quickly," House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said of using the CRA during a recent interview on the Hugh Hewitt show.

House Republicans announced that beginning on Jan. 30, they will move to reverse four recently announced regulations using the CRA and will target other regulations in the weeks ahead.

At the top of the GOP's list is the Stream Protection Rule announced by the Obama administration in December. The rule is aimed at curbing environmental damage from coal mines. It boosts requirements for mining companies to monitor streams and more strictly defines "material damage" to waterways located beyond the mining footprint.

Critics, including Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said the rule constitutes regulatory overreach and will hurt the coal industry.

"This costly regulation, along with others that are already having a devastating impact, are part of the administration's plan to demolish these coal communities right now and long after the president has left office," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said.
----
The House will also take on long-unpopular federal interference in education with a vote to eradicate a bevy of new federal rules that GOP lawmakers believe interfere and in some cases bypass the recently passed bipartisan law overhauling the unpopular No Child Left Behind Act.

Finally, the House will vote under the CRA to undo the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council's final rule, which critics call the "blacklisting order." The rule was finalized in August and establishes a long list of new record-keeping, reporting and compliance requirements that could be used to bar contractors from winning federal contracts. The rule was temporarily blocked in a Texas federal court.

"You're going to see in February, the first two weeks, a lot of those regulations that were in the last 60 legislative days start moving to be repealed," Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said on the Hugh Hewitt show. "Because people don't quite realize, since the November election to Jan. 5, this administration, Obama's, has authored 145 new regulations, they've enacted more than $16 billion on us just since the election."
[Reference Here]

Then candidate Donald Trump in an info-graphic from Facebook posting in 2016 before the November 8th election.

This excerpted and edited from Powerline -

REVIEW THIS
POSTED ON JANUARY 27, 2017 BY SCOTT JOHNSON

Kim Strassel delivers today’s good news in her Wall Street Journal column “A GOP regulatory game changer” (accessible here via Google). She introduces the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Todd Gaziano to explain the mechanics of the rarely used (and almost always unsuccessful) Congressional Review Act of 1996 to undo executive agency regulations. (The text of the Congressional Review Act is accessible here.)

As a staffer to Rep> David McIntosh at the time, Gaziano was “intimately involved” in drafting the law. According to Strassel, “No one knows the law better.” Here’s the beauty part:

The accepted wisdom in Washington is that the CRA can be used only against new regulations, those finalized in the past 60 legislative days. That gets Republicans back to June, teeing up 180 rules or so for override. Included are biggies like the Interior Department’s “streams” rule, the Labor Department’s overtime-pay rule, and the Environmental Protection Agency’s methane rule.

But what Mr. Gaziano told Republicans on Wednesday was that the CRA grants them far greater powers, including the extraordinary ability to overrule regulations even back to the start of the Obama administration. The CRA also would allow the GOP to dismantle these regulations quickly, and to ensure those rules can’t come back, even under a future Democratic president. No kidding.

How does it work? Kim alludes here to 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A) & § 802(b)(2)(A) & (B). With a little help from Gaziano, she explicates the text:

It turns out that the first line of the CRA requires any federal agency promulgating a rule to submit a “report” on it to the House and Senate. The 60-day clock starts either when the rule is published or when Congress receives the report—whichever comes later.

“There was always intended to be consequences if agencies didn’t deliver these reports,” Mr. Gaziano tells me. “And while some Obama agencies may have been better at sending reports, others, through incompetence or spite, likely didn’t.” Bottom line: There are rules for which there are no reports. And if the Trump administration were now to submit those reports—for rules implemented long ago—Congress would be free to vote the regulations down.

Let me pause here to ask Steve Hayward to tune in:

There’s more. It turns out the CRA has a[n] expansive definition of what counts as a “rule”—and it isn’t limited to those published in the Federal Register. The CRA also applies to “guidance” that agencies issue. Think the Obama administration’s controversial guidance on transgender bathrooms in schools or on Title IX and campus sexual assault. It is highly unlikely agencies submitted reports to lawmakers on these actions.

“If they haven’t reported it to Congress, it can now be challenged,” says Paul Larkin, a senior legal research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. Mr. Larkin, also at Wednesday’s meeting, told me challenges could be leveled against any rule or guidance back to 1996, when the CRA was passed.

The best part? Once Congress overrides a rule, agencies cannot reissue it in “substantially the same form” unless specifically authorized by future legislation. The CRA can keep bad regs and guidance off the books even in future Democratic administrations—a far safer approach than if the Mr. Trump simply rescinded them.

It sounds too good to be true. Nevertheless, to quote Lyndon Johnson as he undertook the vast expansion of the edifice of the administrative state: “Let us begin.” Roll away the administrative stone!
[Reference Here]

Key point on what can actually be placed on the chopping block of the Congressional Review Act ... ANY RULE/REGULATION that has not been reported to Congress within the prescribed 60 days can be challenged in this procedure going back to when the CRA was put in place ... 1996!


TAGS: Hugh Hewitt, Congressional Review Act, CRA, 1996, House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kim Strassel, Wall Street Journal, Powerline, Washington Examiner, The Fourth Way, Donald J. Trump, Carter's Second Term